The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Compositional Effects of Large Graphene Oxide Sheets on the Spinnability and Properties of Polyurethane Composite Fibers
Open accessAbstract
Recent advances in wearable electronics, technical textiles, and wearable strain sensing devices have resulted in extensive research on stretchable electrically conductive fibers. Addressing these areas require the development of efficient fiber processing methodologies that do not compromise the mechanical properties of the polymer (typically an elastomer) when nanomaterials are added as conductive fillers. It is highly desirable that the addition of conductive fillers provides not only electrical conductivity, but that these fillers also enhance the stiffness, strength, stretchability, and toughness of the polymer. Here, the compatibility of polyurethane (PU) and graphene oxide (GO) is utilized for the study of the properties of elastomeric conductive fibers prepared by wet‐spinning. The GO‐reinforced PU fibers demonstrate outstanding mechanical properties with a 200‐fold and a threefold enhancement in Young's modulus and toughness, respectively. Postspinning thermal annealing of the fibers results in electrically conductive fibers with a low percolation threshold (≈0.37 wt% GO). An investigation into optimized fiber's electromechanical behavior reveals linear strain sensing abilities up to 70%. Results presented here provide practical insights on how to simultaneously maintain or improve electrical, mechanical, and electromechanical properties in conductive elastomer fibers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Koerner, H., Price, G., Pearce, N. A., Alexander, M., & Vaia, R. A. (2004) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1059 · Cited by 1,034
Sensitive, High-Strain, High-Rate Bodily Motion Sensors Based on Graphene–Rubber Composites
Boland, C. S., Khan, U., Backes, C., O’Neill, A., McCauley, J., Duane, S., Shanker, R., Liu, Y., Jurewicz, I., Dalton, A. B., et al. (2014) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn503454h · Cited by 793
Cited by
Strategies for stable water splitting via protected photoelectrodes
Bae, D., Seger, B., Vesborg, P. C. K., Hansen, O., & Chorkendorff, I. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00918b · Cited by 572
Enzyme‐Powered Nanobots Enhance Anticancer Drug Delivery
Hortelão, A. C., Patiño, T., Perez‐Jiménez, A., Blanco, À., & Sánchez, S. (2018) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201705086 · Cited by 316
Textile‐Based Strain Sensor for Human Motion Detection
Wang, J., Lu, C., & Zhang, K. (2020) · ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS · doi:10.1002/eem2.12041 · Cited by 294
Silica Aerogels; a Review of Synthesis, Applications and Fabrication of Hybrid Composites
Akhter, F., Soomro, S. A., & Inglezakis, V. J. (2021) · Journal of Porous Materials · doi:10.1007/s10934-021-01091-3 · Cited by 131
Biomass-derived electrodes for flexible supercapacitors
Herou, S., Schlee, P., Jorge, A. B., & Titirici, M. (2018) · Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.cogsc.2017.10.005 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Seyedin, S., Razal, J. M., Innis, P. C., Jalili, R., & Wallace, G. G.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials Interfaces
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-01-11
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 2196-7350 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2288294195
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Compositional Effects of Large Graphene Oxide Sheets on the Spinnability and Properties of Polyurethane Composite Fibers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/admi.201500672
- The paper
- Seyedin, S., Razal, J. M., Innis, P. C., Jalili, R., & Wallace, G. G. (2016). Compositional Effects of Large Graphene Oxide Sheets on the Spinnability and Properties of Polyurethane Composite Fibers. Advanced Materials Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201500672
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.