Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 177

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structural Reconstruction of Cu2O Superparticles toward Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction with High C2+ Products Selectivity

Open access
Jiang, Yawen, Wang, Xinyu, Duan, Delong, He, Chaohua, Ma, Jun, Zhang, Wenqing, Liu, Hengjie, Long, Ran, Li, Zibiao, Kong, Tingting, Loh, Xian Jun, Song, Li, Ye, Enyi, Xiong, Yujie·2022·Advanced Science

Abstract

Structural reconstruction is a process commonly observed for Cu‐based catalysts in electrochemical CO 2 reduction. The Cu‐based precatalysts with structural complexity often undergo sophisticated structural reconstruction processes, which may offer opportunities for enhancing the electrosynthesis of multicarbon products (C 2+ products) but remain largely uncertain due to various new structural features possibly arising during the processes. In this work, the Cu 2 O superparticles with an assembly structure are demonstrated to undergo complicated structure evolution under electrochemical reduction condition, enabling highly selective CO 2‐to‐C 2+ products conversion in electrocatalysis. As revealed by electron microscopic characterization together with in situ X‐ray absorption spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy, the building blocks inside the superparticle fuse to generate numerous grain boundaries while those in the outer shell detach to form nanogap structures that can efficiently confine OH− to induce high local pH. Such a combination of unique structural features with local reaction environment offers two important factors for facilitating C−C coupling. Consequently, the Cu 2 O superparticle‐derived catalyst achieves high faradaic efficiencies of 53.2% for C 2 H 4 and 74.2% for C 2+ products, surpassing the performance of geometrically simpler Cu 2 O cube‐derived catalyst and most reported Cu electrocatalysts under comparable conditions. This work provides insights for rationally designing highly selective CO 2 reduction electrocatalysts by controlling structural reconstruction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/advs.202105292

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 177

Metadata

Authors
Jiang, Y., Wang, X., Duan, D., He, C., Ma, J., Zhang, W., Liu, H., Long, R., Li, Z., Kong, T., Loh, X. J., Song, L., Ye, E., & Xiong, Y.
Venue
Advanced Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-04
Volume
9
Issue
16
Pages
e2105292-e2105292
ISSN
2198-3844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4221071015
Cited by
177
References
8
FWCI
6.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structural Reconstruction of Cu2O Superparticles toward Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction with High C2+ Products Selectivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/advs.202105292
The paper
Jiang, Y., Wang, X., Duan, D., He, C., Ma, J., Zhang, W., Liu, H., Long, R., Li, Z., Kong, T., Loh, X. J., Song, L., Ye, E., & Xiong, Y. (2022). Structural Reconstruction of Cu2O Superparticles toward Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction with High C2+ Products Selectivity. Advanced Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202105292

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.