Cited by 19Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Efficacy of tobacco dependence treatment in the context of a “smoke‐free grounds” worksite policy: A case study

Osinubi, Omowunmi Y.O., Sinha, Sharmila, Rovner, Elisheva, Perez‐Lugo, Marla, Jain, Neetu J., Demissie, Kitaw, Goldman, Maurice·2004·American Journal of Industrial Medicine

Abstract

Background: Smoking restrictions provide opportunities to modify smoking behavior. A large insurance company implemented a smoke‐free grounds policy at two of their office complexes in January, 2000. Methods: This cohort study evaluated the impact of the smoke‐free grounds policy on abstinence among 128 employees who participated in a tobacco dependence treatment program. Results: The overall quit rate at 6 months was 44.5%. The larger complex showed a trend for higher quit rates compared to the smaller complex (46.5 vs. 28.6%). Post‐ban participants had higher quit rates than pre‐ban participants (52.4 vs. 43.0%). The probability of abstinence at 6 months follow‐up was higher for post‐ban compared to pre‐ban participants (P = 0.03). Post‐ban participants were 80% less likely to relapse than pre‐ban participants. Non‐quitters decreased their consumption by 6.6 cigarettes/day (39.1% decrease). Conclusions: A “smoke‐free grounds” policy encourages abstinence and may play a significant role in harm reduction among continuing tobacco users. Am. J. Ind. Med. 46:180–187, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajim.20020

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Following the extension of a smoke-free indoor policy to include outdoor spaces at one worksite, participants who enrolled in smoking cessation programs had higher 6-month quit rates after the extension (52.4%) than before (43.0%); post-ban participants were 80% less likely to relapse than pre-ban participants, and nonquitters decreased their consumption by 6.6 cigarettes per day, a 39% decrease.

    “Following the extension of a smoke-free indoor policy to include outdoor spaces at 1 worksite, participants who enrolled in smoking cessation programs had higher 6-month quit rates after the extension (52.4%) than before (43.0%); post-ban participants were 80% less likely to relapse than pre-ban participants, and nonquitters decreased their consumption by 6.6 cigarettes per day, a 39% decrease.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Osinubi, O. Y. O., Sinha, S., Rovner, E., Perez‐Lugo, M., Jain, N. J., Demissie, K., & Goldman, M.
Affiliations
  • Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute (US)
  • University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (US)
  • University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez (PR)
Corresponding author
Osinubi, Omowunmi Y.O.
Venue
American Journal of Industrial Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-07-19
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
180-187
ISSN
  • 0271-3586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0274
OpenAlex
W2004482291
Cited by
19
References
13
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Industrial Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
tobacco dependence treatment, smoking cessation, workplace smoking restrictions, abstinence, relapse, harm reduction, tobacco use reduction, insurance company employees, smoking bans
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New Jersey, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Proportional Hazards Models, Occupational Health, Smoking Cessation, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review