The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Placental efficiency and intrauterine resource allocation strategies in the common marmoset pregnancy
Abstract
Mothers and fetuses are expected to be in some degree of conflict over the allocation of maternal resources to fetal growth in the intrauterine environment. Variation in placental structure and function may be one way a fetus can communicate need and quality to its mother, potentially manipulating maternal investment in its favor. Whereas common marmosets typically produce twin litters, they regularly give birth to triplet litters in captivity. The addition of another fetus is a potential drain on maternal resource availability and thus a source of elevated conflict over resource allocation. Marmoset littermates share a single placental mass, so that differences in the ratio of fetal to placental weight across litter categories suggest the presence of differential intrauterine strategies of resource allocation. The fetal/placental weight ratio was calculated for 26 marmoset pregnancies, representing both twin and triplet litters, to test the hypothesis that triplet fetuses respond to intrauterine conflict by soliciting placental overgrowth as a means of accessing maternal resources. In fact, relative to fetal mass, the triplet marmoset placenta is significantly undergrown, with individual triplets associated with less placental mass than their twin counterparts, suggesting that the triplet placenta is relatively more efficient in its support of fetal growth. There still may be an important role for maternal‐fetal conflict in the programming of placental structure and function. Placental adaptations that solicit potential increases of maternal investment may occur at the microscopic or metabolic level, and thus may not be reflected in the size of the placenta as a whole. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Placental weight is not necessarily higher with a triplet pregnancy compared to a twin pregnancy, and the placenta is actually found to be more efficient (i.e., allocation of placental mass per mass of fetus is much lower) for a triplet pregnancy compared to twins [Rutherford and Tardif, 2008].”
From Describing Ovarian Cycles, Pregnancy Characteristics, and the Use of Contraception in Female White‐Faced Marmosets, Callithrix geoffroyi (2012) · cites this paper as Rutherford and Tardif, 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genetic conflicts in human pregnancy
Haig, D. (1993) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/418300 · Cited by 1,253
Compensatory placental growth after restricted maternal nutrition in early pregnancy
Lunney, L. H. (1998) · Placenta · doi:10.1016/s0143-4004(98)90105-9 · Cited by 164
Research works printed but not linked: 51
- 10.1002/ajp.1031 · DOI
- 10.1159/000129734 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1985.tb04951.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00022-4 · DOI
- 10.1086/382734 · DOI
- Dixson AF, 1992, Paternity in primates: genetic tests and theories: implications of human DNA fingerprinting, 192
- 10.1053/plac.2002.0858 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.06.003 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(19991101)256:3<279::AID-AR7>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
- 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.104141 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bmj.312.7028.410 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1996.tb00035.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1996.9030357.x · DOI
- 10.1002/ajpa.1330840306 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0684.1996.tb00194.x · DOI
- 10.1002/ajp.1350360402 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0143-4004(96)80010-5 · DOI
- Luckett WP, 1974, Reproductive biology of the primates, 142
- 10.1023/A:1015537201184 · DOI
- Merker H‐J, 1988, Non‐human primates—developmental biology and toxicology, 245
- Mesa H, 2003, Correlated response in placental efficiency in swine selected for an index of components of litter size, J Anim Sci, 81, 74, 10.2527/2003.81174x · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-349-09065-5 · DOI
- 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.104968 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0031-9384(98)00249-2 · DOI
- 10.1203/01.PDR.0000155942.18096.9C · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1677/joe.0.1730131 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00301.x · DOI
- Pond WG, 1991, Fetal organ response to maternal protein deprivation during pregnancy in swine, J Nutr, 121, 504, 10.1093/jn/121.4.504 · DOI
- 10.1053/plac.2000.0602 · DOI
- Robinson JS, 1994, Early fetal growth and development, 317
- RutherfordJN.2007.Litter size effects on placental structure and function in common marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus): implications for intrauterine resource allocation strategies. Ph.D. dissertation Indiana University.
- Rutherford JN, 2007, Using ultrasound to estimate gestational age and litter size from placental measurements in marmoset monkeys, Am J Phys Anthropol, 127, 156
- Rutherford JN, The smallest anthropoids: the marmoset‐callimico radiation
- Sadler TW, 1995, Langman's medical embryology, 101
- 10.1002/ajp.20009 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb30405.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1997)42:4<323::AID-AJP7>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0684.1998.tb00065.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00815.x · DOI
- 10.1079/BJN20041269 · DOI
- Tardif SD, 2003, Reproduction in captive common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), Comp Med, 53, 364
- 10.1210/jc.2004-1064 · DOI
- Trivers RL, 1972, Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971, 136
- 10.1093/icb/14.1.249 · DOI
- 10.2527/1999.7771654x · DOI
- Wilson ME, 2001, Comparative aspects of placental efficiency, Reprod Suppl, 58, 223
- 10.1111/j.1600-0684.1999.tb00254.x · DOI
- 10.1002/ar.1090520408 · DOI
- 10.1002/aja.1000640305 · DOI
- 10.1677/joe.0.1500231 · DOI
- Wynn RM, 1974, Electron microscopy of the placenta and related structures of the marmoset, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 122, 60, 10.1016/0002-9378(75)90615-8 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Animal models of human pregnancy and placentation: alternatives to the mouse
Carter, A. M. (2020) · Reproduction · doi:10.1530/rep-20-0354 · Cited by 130
A fully resolved genus level phylogeny of neotropical primates (Platyrrhini)
Wildman, D. E., Jameson, N. M., Opazo, J. C., & Yi, S. V. (2009) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2009.07.019 · Cited by 122
Maternal-fetal resource allocation: Co-operation and conflict
Fowden, A. L., & Moore, T. (2012) · Placenta · doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2012.05.002 · Cited by 114
MUSTOE, A. C., JENSEN, H. A., & FRENCH, J. A. (2012) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.22058 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Rutherford, J. N., & Tardif, S. D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-05-09
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 60-68
- ISSN
- 0002-9483
- 1096-8644
- PMC
- PMC13038092
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review