Cited by 42

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Placental efficiency and intrauterine resource allocation strategies in the common marmoset pregnancy

Rutherford, Julienne N., Tardif, Suzette D.·2008·American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Abstract

Mothers and fetuses are expected to be in some degree of conflict over the allocation of maternal resources to fetal growth in the intrauterine environment. Variation in placental structure and function may be one way a fetus can communicate need and quality to its mother, potentially manipulating maternal investment in its favor. Whereas common marmosets typically produce twin litters, they regularly give birth to triplet litters in captivity. The addition of another fetus is a potential drain on maternal resource availability and thus a source of elevated conflict over resource allocation. Marmoset littermates share a single placental mass, so that differences in the ratio of fetal to placental weight across litter categories suggest the presence of differential intrauterine strategies of resource allocation. The fetal/placental weight ratio was calculated for 26 marmoset pregnancies, representing both twin and triplet litters, to test the hypothesis that triplet fetuses respond to intrauterine conflict by soliciting placental overgrowth as a means of accessing maternal resources. In fact, relative to fetal mass, the triplet marmoset placenta is significantly undergrown, with individual triplets associated with less placental mass than their twin counterparts, suggesting that the triplet placenta is relatively more efficient in its support of fetal growth. There still may be an important role for maternal‐fetal conflict in the programming of placental structure and function. Placental adaptations that solicit potential increases of maternal investment may occur at the microscopic or metabolic level, and thus may not be reflected in the size of the placenta as a whole. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajpa.20846

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. 10.1002/ajp.1031 · DOI
  2. 10.1159/000129734 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1985.tb04951.x · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00022-4 · DOI
  5. 10.1086/382734 · DOI
  6. Dixson AF, 1992, Paternity in primates: genetic tests and theories: implications of human DNA fingerprinting, 192
  7. 10.1053/plac.2002.0858 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.06.003 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(19991101)256:3<279::AID-AR7>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI
  10. 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.104141 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1136/bmj.312.7028.410 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1996.tb00035.x · DOI
  13. 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1996.9030357.x · DOI
  14. 10.1002/ajpa.1330840306 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1600-0684.1996.tb00194.x · DOI
  16. 10.1002/ajp.1350360402 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0143-4004(96)80010-5 · DOI
  18. Luckett WP, 1974, Reproductive biology of the primates, 142
  19. 10.1023/A:1015537201184 · DOI
  20. Merker H‐J, 1988, Non‐human primates—developmental biology and toxicology, 245
  21. Mesa H, 2003, Correlated response in placental efficiency in swine selected for an index of components of litter size, J Anim Sci, 81, 74, 10.2527/2003.81174x · DOI
  22. 10.1007/978-1-349-09065-5 · DOI
  23. 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.104968 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0031-9384(98)00249-2 · DOI
  25. 10.1203/01.PDR.0000155942.18096.9C · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1677/joe.0.1730131 · DOI
  27. 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002.00301.x · DOI
  28. Pond WG, 1991, Fetal organ response to maternal protein deprivation during pregnancy in swine, J Nutr, 121, 504, 10.1093/jn/121.4.504 · DOI
  29. 10.1053/plac.2000.0602 · DOI
  30. Robinson JS, 1994, Early fetal growth and development, 317
  31. RutherfordJN.2007.Litter size effects on placental structure and function in common marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus): implications for intrauterine resource allocation strategies. Ph.D. dissertation Indiana University.
  32. Rutherford JN, 2007, Using ultrasound to estimate gestational age and litter size from placental measurements in marmoset monkeys, Am J Phys Anthropol, 127, 156
  33. Rutherford JN, The smallest anthropoids: the marmoset‐callimico radiation
  34. Sadler TW, 1995, Langman's medical embryology, 101
  35. 10.1002/ajp.20009 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb30405.x · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1997)42:4<323::AID-AJP7>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
  38. 10.1111/j.1600-0684.1998.tb00065.x · DOI
  39. 10.1046/j.1439-0310.2002.00815.x · DOI
  40. 10.1079/BJN20041269 · DOI
  41. Tardif SD, 2003, Reproduction in captive common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus), Comp Med, 53, 364
  42. 10.1210/jc.2004-1064 · DOI
  43. Trivers RL, 1972, Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971, 136
  44. 10.1093/icb/14.1.249 · DOI
  45. 10.2527/1999.7771654x · DOI
  46. Wilson ME, 2001, Comparative aspects of placental efficiency, Reprod Suppl, 58, 223
  47. 10.1111/j.1600-0684.1999.tb00254.x · DOI
  48. 10.1002/ar.1090520408 · DOI
  49. 10.1002/aja.1000640305 · DOI
  50. 10.1677/joe.0.1500231 · DOI
  51. Wynn RM, 1974, Electron microscopy of the placenta and related structures of the marmoset, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 122, 60, 10.1016/0002-9378(75)90615-8 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 42

Metadata

Authors
Rutherford, J. N., & Tardif, S. D.
Venue
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-05-09
Volume
137
Issue
1
Pages
60-68
ISSN
  • 0002-9483
  • 1096-8644
Cited by
42
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review