The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Residence rule flexibility and descent groups dynamics shape uniparental genetic diversities in South East Asia
Abstract
Objectives: Social organization plays a major role in shaping human population genetic diversity. In particular, matrilocal populations tend to exhibit less mitochondrial diversity than patrilocal populations, and the other way around for Y chromosome diversity. However, several studies have not replicated such findings. The objective of this study is to understand the reasons for such inconsistencies and further evaluate the influence of social organization on genetic diversity. Materials and Methods: We explored uniparental diversity patterns using mitochondrial HV1 sequences and 17 Y‐linked short tandem repeats (STRs) in 12 populations (n = 619) from mainland South–East Asia exhibiting a wide range of social organizations, along with quantitative ethno‐demographic information sampled at the individual level. Results: MtDNA diversity was lower in matrilocal than in multilocal and patrilocal populations while Y chromosome diversity was similar among these social organizations. The reasons for such asymmetry at the genetic level were understood by quantifying sex‐specific migration rates from our ethno‐demographic data: while female migration rates varied between social organizations, male migration rates did not. This unexpected lack of difference in male migrations resulted from a higher flexibility in residence rule in patrilocal than in matrilocal populations. In addition, our data suggested an impact of clan fission process on uniparental genetic patterns. Conclusions: The observed lack of signature of patrilocality on Y chromosome patterns might be attributed to the higher residence flexibility in the studied patrilocal populations, thus providing a potential explanation for the apparent discrepancies between social and genetic structures. Altogether, this study highlights the need to quantify the actual residence and descent patterns to fit social to genetic structures.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“On the other hand, matrilocality, the rule according to which the couple settles near the wife’s place of birth, is known to reduce diversity on mtDNA compared to the Y chromosome within groups (e.g. in the West Timor population30, Ngazidja of Comoros Islands31, and South-East Asian populations32).”
From Patrilineal segmentary systems provide a peaceful explanation for the post-Neolithic Y-chromosome bottleneck (2024) · cites this paper as [32]
Citations
Cites
From Social to Genetic Structures in Central Asia
Chaix, R., Quintana-Murci, L., Hegay, T., Hammer, M. F., Mobasher, Z., Austerlitz, F., & Heyer, E. (2007) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.058 · Cited by 111
Self-citationSégurel, L., Martínez-Cruz, B., Quintana-Murci, L., Balaresque, P., Georges, M., Hegay, T., Aldashev, A., Nasyrova, F., Jobling, M. A., Heyer, E., et al. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000200 · Cited by 95
Sex‐specific genetic diversity is shaped by cultural factors in Inner Asian human populations
Marchi, N., Hegay, T., Mennecier, P., Georges, M., Laurent, R., Whitten, M., Endicott, P., Aldashev, A., Dorzhu, C., Nasyrova, F., et al. (2017) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.23151 · Cited by 38
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 · DOI · Paper page
- Besaggio D., 2007, Genetic variation in Northern Thailand Hill Tribes: Origins and relationships with social structure and linguistic differences, BMC Evol Biol, 7, S12, 10.1186/1471-2148-7-S2-S12 · DOI
- Bourdier F., 2006, The mountain of precious stones. Ratanakiri: Cambodia: Essays in social anthropology
- 10.1525/aa.1963.65.1.02a00100 · DOI
- 10.1525/ae.1976.3.2.02a00030 · DOI
- 10.1086/425938 · DOI · Paper page
- Dessaint W. Y., 1981, The T'in (Mal), dry rice cultivators of Northern Thailand, J Siam Soc, 69, 107
- 10.1111/mec.12001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0006-3207(75)90052-X · DOI
- Dournes J., 1972, Paris: Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (Travaux et Mémoires de l'Institut d'Ethnologie n°77)
- 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1977.tb41805.x · DOI
- 10.4000/books.irdeditions.2366 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01186.x · DOI
- Godelier M., 2004, Métamorphoses de la parenté
- 10.1093/molbev/msv102 · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms1235 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0409253102 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05406.x · DOI · Paper page
- Izikowitz K. G., 1951, Lamet hill peasants in French Indochina
- 10.1086/346065 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s004140050051 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1963.tb03281.x · DOI
- Kumar V., 2006, Global patterns in human mitochondrial DNA and Y‐chromosome variation caused by spatial instability of the local cultural processes, PLoS Genet, 2, 420
- LeBar F. M., 1964, Ethnic groups of mainland Southeast Asia, Human Relations Area Files.
- Ledgerwood J. L., 1995, Khmer kinship—The matriliny matriarchy myth, J Anthropol Res, 51, 247, 10.1086/jar.51.3.3630360 · DOI
- Levinson D., 1980, Toward explaining human culture: A critical review of the findings of worldwide cross‐cultural research, New Haven, CT: Human Relations Area Files.
- Lindell K., 1979, Kinship and marriage in Northern Kammu villages: The Kinship model, Sociologus, 29, 60
- 10.1186/2041-2223-5-13 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05689.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0376-6357(00)00118-2 · DOI
- Martel G., 1975, Lovea. Village des environs d'Angkor. Aspects démographiques, économiques et sociologiques du monde rural cambodgien dans la province de Siem‐Réap
- Matras‐Troubetzkoy J., 1983, Un Village En Foret. L'essartage Chez Les Brou Du Cambodge
- 10.1093/genetics/142.3.1061 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajpa.22933 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ng711 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ejhg.2013.12 · DOI · Paper page
- Schmutz J., 2013, The Ta'Oi Language and People, Mon‐Khmer Stud, 42, i
- 10.1038/3088 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s12110-011-9105-9 · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/98.1.179 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/jhg.2014.62 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/molbev/mss328 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gde.2006.10.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/bies.20378 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Guyon, L., Guez, J., Toupance, B., Heyer, E., & Chaix, R. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-47618-5 · Cited by 28
Self-citationHrnčíř, V., Duda, P., Šaffa, G., Květina, P., & Zrzavý, J. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229363 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Ly, G., Alard, B., Laurent, R., Lafosse, S., Toupance, B., Monidarin, C., Diffloth, G., Bourdier, F., Evrard, O., Pavard, S., & Chaix, R.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-01-23
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 480-491
- ISSN
- 0002-9483
- 1096-8644
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
- Funders
- ANR (JC09_441218)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Residence rule flexibility and descent groups dynamics shape uniparental genetic diversities in South East Asia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajpa.23374
- The paper
- Ly, G., Alard, B., Laurent, R., Lafosse, S., Toupance, B., Monidarin, C., Diffloth, G., Bourdier, F., Evrard, O., Pavard, S., & Chaix, R. (2018). Residence rule flexibility and descent groups dynamics shape uniparental genetic diversities in South East Asia. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23374