Cited by 19Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Anesthesia‐induced hippocampal‐cortical hyperactivity and tau hyperphosphorylation impair remote memory retrieval in Alzheimer's disease

Open access

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Anesthesia often exacerbates memory recall difficulties in individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD), but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. METHODS: We used in vivo Ca 2+ imaging, viral‐based circuit tracing, and chemogenetic approaches to investigate anesthesia‐induced remote memory impairment in mouse models of presymptomatic AD. RESULTS: Our study identified pyramidal neuron hyperactivity in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) as a significant contributor to anesthesia‐induced remote memory impairment. This ACC hyperactivation arises from the disinhibition of local inhibitory circuits and increased excitatory inputs from the hippocampal CA1 region. Inhibiting hyperactivity in the CA1‐ACC circuit improved memory recall after anesthesia. Moreover, anesthesia led to increased tau phosphorylation in the hippocampus, and inhibiting this hyperphosphorylation prevented ACC hyperactivity and subsequent memory impairment. DISCUSSION: Hippocampal‐cortical hyperactivity plays a role in anesthesia‐induced remote memory impairment. Targeting tau hyperphosphorylation shows promise as a therapeutic strategy to mitigate anesthesia‐induced neural network dysfunction and retrograde amnesia in AD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/alz.13464

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Post-anesthesia arousal is associated with hyperactivity in mice.

    “Post-anesthesia arousal is associated with hyperactivity in mice11”

    From A curious concept of CNS clearance (2025) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports increased neuronal activity after sevoflurane anesthesia in presymptomatic Alzheimer’s-model mice, which supports a narrower version of the claim. It does not establish hyperactivity during post-anesthesia arousal: the Results measure neuronal activity the following day and report no significant increase in the mice’s locomotor activity. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 70

  1. 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.04.014 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/nrn.2016.128 · DOI
  3. 10.1186/s13024-023-00627-2 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/s41582-022-00698-7 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002956 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.02.009 · DOI
  7. 10.1096/fj.08-122424 · DOI
  8. 10.3389/fcell.2021.801422 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00830-9 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/nrn3677 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1038/nrn1607 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/23270 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1126/science.1098180 · DOI
  14. 10.1126/science.1161299 · DOI
  15. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1068-06.2006 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.033 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.018 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.2174/156720510793611592 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/nrn.2015.1 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2013.03.004 · DOI
  21. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31824be8c7 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000278 · DOI
  23. 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003452 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.bja.2021.08.028 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/s42003-021-02047-8 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/acel.13592 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.bja.2020.08.061 · DOI
  28. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005487 · DOI
  29. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1279-19.2019 · DOI
  30. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1397-18.2018 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.108535 · DOI
  32. 10.1177/2192568217701105 · DOI
  33. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4854-06.2007 · DOI
  34. 10.1096/fj.201902135R · DOI
  35. 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005268 · DOI
  36. 10.1371/journal.pone.0080355 · DOI
  37. 10.1074/jbc.272.40.25326 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/advs.202104106 · DOI
  39. 10.3791/59598 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/s41592-021-01230-3 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/j.isci.2019.06.040 · DOI
  42. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf7151 · DOI
  43. Lu J, 2023, Blood tau‐PT217 contributes to the anesthesia/surgery‐induced delirium‐like behavior in aged mice, Alzheimers Dement
  44. 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010814-124803 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.06.019 · DOI
  46. 10.3389/fnins.2019.00986 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01483-2 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1089/brain.2012.0107 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/s41593-018-0211-4 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.03.042 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.11.045 · DOI
  52. 10.1038/nn.4137 · DOI
  53. 10.1523/ENEURO.0418-20.2020 · DOI
  54. Haruwaka K, 2022, Microglial process dynamics enhance neuronal activity by shielding GABAergic synaptic inputs, Biorxiv
  55. 10.1172/JCI159344 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.bja.2021.01.017 · DOI
  57. 10.1186/s12893-016-0120-y · DOI
  58. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03501.x · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1093/cercor/bhp108 · DOI
  60. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1042-16.2016 · DOI
  61. 10.1038/nature15389 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1016/j.cell.2022.04.001 · DOI
  63. Andrianova L, 2022, No evidence from complementary data sources of a direct projection from the mouse anterior cingulate cortex to the hippocampal formation, Biorxiv
  64. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.023 · DOI
  65. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5215-08.2009 · DOI
  66. 10.1002/ana.22105 · DOI
  67. 10.1073/pnas.1206171109 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3191-12.2013 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000579 · DOI
  70. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318229a660 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, K., Gupta, R., Martín‐Ávila, A., Cui, M., Xie, Z., & Yang, G.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Xie, Zhongcong
  • Yang, Guang
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-09-11
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
494-510
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W4386592618
Cited by
19
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (GM131765, AG041274, AG062509, NS118302)
  • Alzheimer's Association (AARFD‐17‐533584)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
anesthesia, Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Anesthesia, Animals, Hippocampus, Memory, Memory Disorders, Mice, Memory, Long-Term

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review