The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modulation of use‐dependent plasticity by d‐amphetamine
Abstract
Use‐dependent plasticity, thought to contribute to functional recovery after brain injury, is elicited by motor training. The purpose of this study was to determine if administration of d‐amphetamine facilitates the effects of motor training on use‐dependent plasticity. Healthy human volunteers underwent a training period of voluntary thumb movements under the effects of placebo or d‐amphetamine in different sessions in a randomized double‐blind, counterbalanced design. Previous work in a drug‐naive condition showed that such training causes changes in the direction of thumb movements evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation and in transcranial magnetic stimulation‐evoked electromyographic responses. The endpoint measure of the study was the magnitude of training‐induced changes in transcranial magnetic stimulation‐evoked kinematic and electromyographic responses in the d‐amphetamine and in the placebo conditions. Motor training resulted in increased magnitude, faster development and longer lasting duration of use‐dependent plasticity under d‐amphetamine compared to the placebo session. These results document a facilitatory effect of d‐amphetamine on use‐dependent plasticity, a possible mechanism mediating the beneficial effect of this drug on functional recovery after cortical lesions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Interestingly, this use-dependent plasticity rests on neuromodulatory transmitter function (Bütefisch et al. 2002) of the sort that may encode precision (Friston 2008).”
From Action and behavior: a free-energy formulation (2010) · cites this paper as Bütefisch et al. 2002
Citations
Cites
Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation
Chen, R., Classen, J., Gerloff, C., Celnik, P., Wassermann, E. M., Hallett, M., & Cohen, L. G. (1997) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.48.5.1398 · Cited by 2,128 · cited 1×
“1Hz, a rate that does not affect motor cortical excitability.(31) Subjects occasionally realized that the thumb had moved but could not determine its direction.”
BackgroundSelf-citationNudo, R. J., Wise, B. M., SiFuentes, F., & Milliken, G. W. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.272.5269.1791 · Cited by 1,911
Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning
Kami, A., Meyer, G., Jezzard, P., Adams, M. M., Turner, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/377155a0 · Cited by 1,883
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- 10.1146/annurev.ne.14.030191.001033 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.8122113 · DOI
- Donoghue JP, 1996, Acquisition of motor behavior in vertebrates, 363
- 10.1152/jn.1998.80.6.3321 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.1998.79.2.1117 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/678 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-510X(95)00003-K · DOI
- 10.1126/science.7100929 · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.410230117 · DOI
- Walker‐Batson D, 1992, Use of amphetamine in the treatment of aphasia, Restor Neurol Neurosci, 4, 47
- 10.1161/01.STR.26.12.2254 · DOI
- 10.1016/0006-8993(75)90834-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0091-3057(90)90279-Q · DOI
- 10.1155/NP.1993.175 · DOI
- 10.1001/archneur.1994.00540160107014 · DOI
- 10.1177/136140969100500111 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03326520 · DOI
- 10.1016/0304-3940(93)90127-7 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02246156 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02198483 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00404057 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01977664 · DOI
- 10.1016/0006-8993(84)91124-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/0091-3057(83)90263-0 · DOI
- Bütefisch CM, 2000, Mechanisms of use‐dependent plasticity in human motor cortex, Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A, 97, 3661, 10.1073/pnas.97.7.3661 · DOI
- Sawaki L, 2000, Central cholinergic influences in use‐dependent human cortical plasticity, Neurology, 54, A3
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199608)19:8<1043::AID-MUS13>3.0.CO;2-Y · DOI
- 10.1016/0013-4694(94)90029-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/brln.1999.2262 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.283.5401.549 · DOI · Paper page
- Spiegel R, 1978, Effects of amphetamines on performance and on polygraphic sleep parameters in man, Adv Biosci, 21, 189
- 10.1016/0168-5597(94)90149-X · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.410400306 · DOI
- Amassian VE, 1987, Magnetic coil versus electrical stimulation of monkey motor cortex, J Physiol, 394, 119P
- 10.1016/S0924-980X(97)00041-6 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.89.1.123 · DOI
- Reus VI, 1979, d‐Amphetamine: effects on memory in a depressed population, Biol Psychiatry, 14, 345
- Feeney DM, 1981, Amphetamine restores locomotor function after motor cortex injury in the rat, Proc West Pharmacol Soc, 24, 15
- 10.1007/BF00433018 · DOI
- Goldstein LB, 1990, Pharmacology of recovery after stroke, Stroke, 21, III139
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–161 of 161
Amphetamine and other pharmacological agents in human and animal studies of recovery from stroke.
Walker-Batson, D., Mehta, J., Smith, P. S., & Johnson, M. D. (2016) · Progress in Neuro-psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2015.04.002 · Cited by 25
“Recently other groups have reported positive findings in post-lesioned animals after AMPH administration (Atkins and Jones, 2005; Barbay et al., 2006; Bütefisch et al., 2002; Papadopoulos et al., 2009; Stroemer et al., 1998).”
BackgroundRecent Advances in Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation
Feng, W., & Belagaje, S. R. (2014) · Seminars in Neurology · doi:10.1055/s-0033-1364215 · Cited by 28
Johnstone, A., Levenstein, J. M., Hinson, E. L., & Stagg, C. J. (2017) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1177/0271678x17727670 · Cited by 30
“Similarly, D-amphetamine, which causes release of dopamine, norepinephrine and serotonin, has also been shown to enhance training-induced changes in TMS responses.(166,167) Another study showed increasing norepinephrine levels using selective norepinephrinereuptake inhibitor reboxetine caused improvements in gross mot…”
ResultMosberger, A. C., de Clauser, L., Kasper, H., & Schwab, M. E. (2016) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.039537.115 · Cited by 25
“suggested in motor skill learning in humans (Butefisch et al. 2002; Sawaki et al. 2002; Floel et al. 2005a; Palminteri et al. 2011; Lissek et al. 2014).”
BackgroundThe effect of coordination mode on use-dependent plasticity.
Ackerley, S., Stinear, C., & Byblow, W. (2007) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.020 · Cited by 23
“The primary motor cortex (M1) can be modified by motor practice, commonly referred to as use-dependent plasticity (UDP) (Nudo et al., 1996; Classen et al., 1998; Bütefisch et al., 2000, 2002).”
BackgroundGultekin, R., Huang, S., Clavisi, O., Pattuwage, L., König, T., & Gruen, R. (2016) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.011 · Cited by 22
“However, to date, this has only been demonstrated in animal models and clinical trials with these drugs have mainly been conducted with stroke patients as well as health human participants [39–41].”
ResultIncreased Use-Dependent Plasticity in Chronic Insomnia
Salas, R. M. E., Galea, J. M., Gamaldo, A. A., Gamaldo, C. E., Allen, R. P., Smith, M. T., Cantarero, G. L., Lam, B., & Celnik, P. A. (2014) · SLEEP · doi:10.5665/sleep.3492 · Cited by 22
Repetitive visual stimulation: A neuropsychological approach to the treatment of cortical blindness
Widdig, W., Pleger, B., Rommel, O., Malin, J., & Tegenthoff, M. (2003) · NeuroRehabilitation (Reading, MA) · doi:10.3233/nre-2003-18307 · Cited by 21
“The clinical syndrome of cortical blindness with a complete loss of visual perception can occur after a bioccipital infarction in the visual cortex areas 17, 18 and most of area 19 [5].”
BackgroundWang, L. E., Fink, G. R., Dafotakis, M., & Grefkes, C. (2009) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.024 · Cited by 17
Conditions for enhancing the encoding of an elementary motor memory by rTMS
Buetefisch, C., Howard, C., Korb, C., Haut, M., Shuster, L. I., Pergami, P., Smith, C., & Hobbs, G. (2014) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2014.07.006 · Cited by 17
Nadeau, S. E., & Wu, S. S. (2006) · Neurorehabilitation · doi:10.3233/nre-2006-21203 · Cited by 14
“[ 14 ] 6 R -D B -C O -P C N or m al D -A M P 10 m g be fo re”
Wu, M., Satogami, K., Liang, C., Stubbs, B., Carvalho, A. F., Brunoni, A. R., Su, K., Tu, Y., Wu, Y., Chen, T., et al. (2022) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/pcn.13452 · Cited by 17
Good, D. C. (2003) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/01.phm.0000086993.06450.c0 · Cited by 11
“Interesting new studies have shown that TMS can be used to monitor cortical plasticity associated with motor learning in normal subjects.(66,67) This plasticity can be augmented by administration of amphetamine and blocked by other drugs, including dextromethorphan and lorazepam.”
BackgroundNoradrenergic agonists for acute traumatic brain injury.
Forsyth, R., & Jayamoni, B. (2003) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003984 · Cited by 14
Modulation of use-dependent plasticity by d-amphetamine.
Bütefisch, C., Davis, B. C., Sawaki, L., Waldvogel, D., Classen, J., Kopylev, L., & Cohen, L. (2002) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1567-424x(09)70228-4 · Cited by 12
Self-citationSafety and improvement of movement function after stroke with atomoxetine: A pilot randomized trial
Ward, A., Carrico, C., Powell, E. S., Westgate, P., Nichols, L., Fleischer, A., & Sawaki, L. (2016) · Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience · doi:10.3233/rnn-160673 · Cited by 11
“Tasks had progressive difficulty, meaning that task demands elicited progressively more skilled performance over time (shaping) (Wolf et al., 2006).”
Self-citationThe Effects of Venlafaxine on Cortical Motor Area Activity in Healthy Subjects: A Pilot Study
Li, C.-Y., Song, X.-Z., Han, L.-X., Xie, Q., Wang, J., Li, Y.-K., Liu, F.-D., & Liu, Y. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1097/jcp.0000000000000056 · Cited by 11
“Meanwhile, amphetamine-like agents, such as fenozolone and methylphenidate (Ritalin), by stimulating the release of NE, acting on synaptic plasticity, and thereby increasing the excitability of the cortex, have significant efficacy in functional reorganization after stroke, with or without rehabilitative training.(5,6…”
BackgroundNeuroplasticity and Neurorecovery
Muresanu, D. (2009) · doi:10.1159/000210271 · Cited by 11
Emerging therapies in stroke rehabilitation.
Young, S., & Kong, K. H. (2007) · Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore · doi:10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.v36n1p58 · Cited by 10
Accidental Substance Abuse Poisoning In Children: Experience of the Dammam Poison Control Center
Ragab, A., AlMazroua, M. K., & Mahmoud, N. F. (2014) · doi:10.4172/2161-0495.1000204 · Cited by 9
“Diagnosis can be confirmed by detecting amphetamine in stomach contents or vomitus, or mainly by positive results obtained in urine tests for illicit drugs [4].”
BackgroundNorepinephrine depletion facilitates recovery of function after focal ischemia in the rat
Windle, V., Power, A., & Corbett, D. (2007) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05799.x · Cited by 9
“…shown to facilitate plasticity, neurogenesis and neurotrophin increases (Stroemer et al., 1998; Malberg et al., 2000; Russo-Neustadt et al., 2001; Butefisch et al., 2002), whereas decreasing NE pharmacologically can decrease BNDF and plasticity associated with exercise (Garcia et al., 2003) and…”
BackgroundDopaminergic influences on changes in human tactile acuity induced by tactile coactivation
Bliem, B., Frombach, E., Ragert, P., Knossalla, F., Woitalla, D., Tegenthoff, M., & Dinse, H. (2007) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-007-0912-5 · Cited by 9
“As previously shown, amphetamine stabilizes use-dependent motor cortex plasticity (ButeWsch et al. 2002; Sawaki et al. 2002), accelerates recovery of motor function in stroke patients”
BackgroundRecovery from ischemic stroke: a translational research perspective for neurology
Seitz, R. J., & Buetefisch, C. M. (2006) · Future Neurology · doi:10.2217/14796708.1.5.571 · Cited by 8
“(2006) 1(5) demonstrated that the cortical excitability is under balancing control by both inhibitory and excitatory neurotransmitters, which are key players of synaptic plasticity [76,77].”
BackgroundThe positive effect of venlafaxine on central motor conduction.
Li, C.-Y., Liu, F.-D., Peng, H.-Y., Huang, Y., Song, X., Xie, Q., Li, Y.-K., & Liu, Y. (2018) · Clinical neurology and neurosurgery (Dutch-Flemish ed. Print) · doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.02.017 · Cited by 8
Xie, Q., Liu, Y., Li, C.-Y., Song, X.-Z., Wang, J., Han, L.-X., & Bai, H. (2012) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-012-2730-0 · Cited by 8
“…after brain damage, neuroregulators, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), or norepinephrine (NE) agonists can improve recovery of motor function, language, cognition, etc. and increase the Barthel index (Horsfield et al. 2002; Butefisch et al. 2002; De Boissezon 2007; Berends 2009).”
BackgroundHarbeck-Seu, A., Brunk, I., Platz, T., Vajkoczy, P., Endres, M., & Spies, C. (2011) · Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aco.0b013e328344587f · Cited by 11
Systems Neuroscience and Rehabilitation
Kansaku, K., & Cohen, L. G. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-4-431-54008-3 · Cited by 15
Self-citationEffects of monoaminergic drugs on training-induced motor cortex plasticity in older adults
Kesar, T. M., Belagaje, S., Pergami, P., Haut, M., Hobbs, G., & Buetefisch, C. (2017) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2017.06.015 · Cited by 7
“This is in contrast to our previous findings in young individuals practicing thumb movements in a motor learning paradigm, where AMPH enhanced motor learning and retention beyond the naïve or placebo training related gains (Butefisch, 2003; Bütefisch et al., 2002; Sawaki et al., 2002).”
ResultEnhancement of motor coordination by applying high frequency repetitive TMS on the sensory cortex.
Choi, E., Yoo, W., Ohn, S., Ahn, S., Kim, H., & Jung, K.-I. (2016) · Journal of Electromyography & Kinesiology · doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.02.008 · Cited by 7
“Plenty of researches regarding use-dependent plasticity of the sensory and motor cortex have been reported (Recanzone et al., 1992; Karni et al., 1995; Nudo and Milliken, 1996; Classen et al., 1998; Butefisch et al., 2000; Bütefisch et al., 2002).”
BackgroundSugawara, K., Tanabe, S., Higashi, T., Tsurumi, T., & Kasai, T. (2011) · International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation · doi:10.1097/mrr.0b013e3283419496 · Cited by 7
“…use-dependent plasticity is thought to underlie improvement in motor performance (Ziemann et al., 2001; Nudo, 2003) and in the encoding of motor memories (Shadmehr and Holcomb, 1997; Classen et al., 1998; Butefisch et al., 2000, 2002; Donchin et al., 2002; Copyright © Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.”
BackgroundNew developments in stroke rehabilitation
Rocksmith, E. R., & REDING, M. J. (2002) · Current Atherosclerosis Reports · doi:10.1007/s11883-002-0006-6 · Cited by 5
Plasticity in the Human Nervous System: Stimulation-induced plasticity in the human motor cortex
Classen, J., & Ziemann, U. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511544903.005 · Cited by 7
Self-citationPrinciples and Practices of Neurological Rehabilitation
Dobkin, B. H. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-7525-3.50062-5 · Cited by 3
Jones, R. W., Morris, K., & Nutt, D. (2007) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012370624-9/50011-6 · Cited by 8
Plasticity and recovery of function
Quentin, R., Awosika, O. O., & Cohen, L. G. (2019) · Handbook of clinical neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-804281-6.00025-2 · Cited by 15
Self-citationTodd, G., Pearson-Dennett, V., Flavel, S., Haberfield, M., Edwards, H., & White, J. M. (2015) · Journal of Neural Transplantation and Plasticity · doi:10.1155/2016/9485079 · Cited by 4
Rasmussen, R., Overgaard, K., Kristiansen, U., & Johansen, F. (2011) · Neurological Research · doi:10.1179/1743132811y.0000000009 · Cited by 4
Effect of amantadine on motor memory consolidation in humans
Tahar, A., Blanchet, P., & Doyon, J. (2005) · Behavioural Pharmacology · doi:10.1097/00008877-200503000-00006 · Cited by 4
Effect of electrical stimulation of antagonist muscles for voluntary motor drive
Sugawara, K., Tanabe, S., Suzuki, T., & Higashi, T. (2019) · Somatosensory & motor research · doi:10.1080/08990220.2019.1615426 · Cited by 3
“…several previous studies, which demonstrated that voluntary motor drive enhanced motor control strategies in agonist and antagonist muscles (Shadmehr and Holcomb 1997; Classen et al. 1998; Butefisch et al. 2000; Butefisch et al. 2002; Donchin et al. 2002; Sawaki et al. 2002; Butefisch et al. 2004).”
BackgroundPharmacological Support of Neurorehabilitation
Ragert, B. P. A. P. (2006) · doi:10.2174/157488506775268489 · Cited by 3
“In fact, these results document a facilitatory effect of d-amphetamine on use-dependent plasticity and associated plastic changes in the human motor cortex [ 14 ].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialReidler, J. S., Nascimento, B., Wu, D., Carvas, M., Massuyama, B., de Oliveira, B. B. M., Zaghi, S., de Rezende, D. T., El-Nazer, R., Gonçalves, W., et al. (2010) · Psychology & Neuroscience · doi:10.3922/j.psns.2010.2.004 · Cited by 2
“Successful manipulation of cortical excitability to improve learning processes and cognitive training has been demonstrated in humans in neuropharmacological investigations (Butefisch et al., 2002), with TMS (Butefisch, Khurana, Kopylev, & Cohen, 2004), and with deafferentation of adjacent or contralateral body parts…”
MethodTranskranielle Magnetstimulation in der neuropsychiatrischen Forschung
Plewnia, C. (2003) · Steinkopff eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-57370-5_19 · Cited by 2
Bulboacă, A., Stanescu, I., Nicula, C., & Bulboacă, A. (2021) · Balneo and PRM Research Journal · doi:10.12680/balneo.2021.412 · Cited by 1
“Both γaminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate (through NMDA and AMPA receptors) can contribute to the efficiency of synapsis, facilitation or inhibiting the synaptic activity to build new neural networks for a diminished or lost function (25,26).”
BackgroundPharmakologische Aspekte in der Neurorehabilitation
Hömberg, V. (2017) · Aktuelle Neurologie · doi:10.1055/s-0043-116377 · Cited by 1
Neural Plasticity: Influencing Elements and Modulation Techniques
Li, K., & Boakye, M. (2011) · Journal of Neurology & Neurophysiology · doi:10.4172/2155-9562.s4-003 · Cited by 1
“Although AMPH may bring transient side effect including irritability, increased alertness, and a feeling of being detached from the environment [16], it is conceivable that d-amphetamine enhances the neural plasticity thought to contribute to functional recovery after brain injury and cortical lesions [11,23].”
BackgroundPharmacology of Motor and Somatosensory Skills in Humans
Pleger, B., Tegenthoff, M., Dinse, H. R., Ragert, P., & Schwenkreis, P. (2005) · Current Neuropharmacology · doi:10.2174/1570159053586690 · Cited by 1
Brain Plasticity and Stroke Recovery
Hallett, M. (2003) · doi:10.2490/jjrm1963.40.supplement_s74 · Cited by 1
Récupération après une lésion cérébrale : facteurs décisifs en rééducation
Leemann, B. (2016) · doi:10.13097/archive-ouverte/unige:90647 · Cited by 1
“Chez des sujets sains humains, l’administration de D-amphétamine facilite l’entrainement moteur [213] et l’apprentissage langagier [214, 215].”
BackgroundKortikale Exzitabilität – Messung und Modulation
Eschweiler, G. W., & Plewnia, C. (2003) · Nervenheilkunde · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1624396 · Cited by 1
“Diese Veränderung der Erregbarkeit war mit einer erhöhten Bereitschaft dieses Areals zur funktionellen Reorganisation gekoppelt, die sich z.B. in erhöhter Effektivität von motorischem Training zeigte (81).”
BackgroundInfluentialCognition Enhancers Roy Jones The Research Institute for the Care of the Elderly , Bath
Jones, R. W., Morris, K., & Nutt, D. (2002) · doi:10.1037/e603292011-001 · Cited by 1
Fayed, I. H., Ahmed, R. A. M. A., Fahmy, E., Ismail, R., Honin, A. A., & Shaker, H. (2026) · Human Movement · doi:10.5114/hm/217434
D-amphetamine alters the dynamic ECoG activity distribution patterns in the rat neocortex
Mellbin, A., Jörntell, H., & Bengtsson, F. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-26688-5
Thorstensen, J. R., Henderson, T. T., & Kavanagh, J. J. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.02082
“…more examining NA active drugs (Berger et al., 2018; Boroojerdi et al., 2001; Buchmann et al., 2010; Buchmann et al., 2007; Buchmann et al., 2006; Butefisch et al., 2002; Foster et al., 2006; Gilbert et al., 2006a; Gilbert et al., 2006b; Gilbert et al., 2007; Herwig et al., 2002; Hoeppner et…”
BackgroundThe importance of volitional behavior in neuroplasticity
Hatsopoulos, N. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · doi:10.1073/pnas.2208739119
Pharmacological Aspects of Neurorehabilitation
Hömberg, V. (2017) · Neurology International Open · doi:10.1055/s-0043-116338 · Cited by 1
Nielsen, R. K. (2016) · doi:10.5278/vbn.phd.med.00068
“This use-dependent plasticity has been shown to be facilitated or inhibited by excitability-enhancing (Butefisch et al., 2002; Feeney, Gonzalez, & Law, 1982) or excitability-reducing pharmacological agents (Blin et al.”
BackgroundTheoretical Basis for Closed-Loop Stimulation as a Therapeutic Approach to Brain Injury
Guggenmos, D. J., & Nudo, R. J. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-4-431-55037-2_6 · Cited by 1
Improvement of Spastic Stroke Hemiparesis Using rTMS Combined with Motor Training
Koganemaru, S., Mima, T., Fukuyama, H., & Domen, K. (2011) · doi:10.1007/978-4-431-54008-3_4
“In healthy subjects, use-dependent plasticity (UDP) has been reported, in which motor training induced LTP-like changes in the cortico-spinal neurons representing only agonist, but not antagonist, muscles for a trained movement [ 31 , 32].”
12. Levodopa improves procedural motor learning in chronic stroke patients
Rösser, N., & Flöel, A. (2009) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.07.015
Metadata
- Authors
- Bütefisch, C. M., Davis, B. C., Sawaki, L., Waldvogel, D., Classen, J., Kopylev, L., & Cohen, L. G.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- University of Rostock (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Cohen, Leonardo G.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-12-03
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59-68
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2085716451
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 8.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- OAM-NIH
- Humboldt Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- use-dependent plasticity, d-amphetamine, motor training, functional recovery after brain injury, cortical lesions, transcranial magnetic stimulation, electromyographic response, kinematic response, thumb movement
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Brain Injuries, Conditioning, Psychological, Dextroamphetamine, Double-Blind Method, Electric Stimulation, Female, Humans, Magnetics, Male, Movement, Neuronal Plasticity, Thumb, Evoked Potentials, Motor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review