Cited by 583Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The pharmacological and anatomical substrates of the amphetamine response in the rat

Creese, Ian, Iversen, Susan D.·1975·Brain Research

Abstract

Bilateral 6-hydroxydopamine microinjections into the substantia nigra abolished both the locomotor and stereotyped responses to d-amphetamine in adult rats. The lesions resulted in a depletion of over 99 per cent of striatal tyrosine hydroxylase activity (indicating a near total lesion of the nigro-striatal dopamine pathway) as well as severe noradrenaline depletions. However, lesion of the dorsal or ventral noradrenergic pathways resulted in similar noradrenaline depletions but with no effect on striatal tyrosine hydroxylase levels and without the concomitant blockage of the amphetamine response. The substantia nigra lesioned rats were behaviourally supersensitive to apomorphine and L-DOPA and did not show a locomotor response to cocaine. The substantia nigra lesioned rats were not aphagic or adipsic. It was concluded that both the locomotor and stereotyped responses induced by amphetamine are dependent on the functional integrity of the nigro-striatal dopamine pathway.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-8993(75)90834-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both novelty-induced locomotor activity and the hyperactivity evoked by amphetamine depend on nucleus accumbens dopamine neurotransmission.

    “Given that both novelty-induced locomotor activity (Hooks and Kalivas 1994) and the hyperactivity evoked by amphetamine depend on nucleus accumbens dopamine neurotransmission (Creese and Iversen 1975; Pijnenburg et al. 1975)”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Creese, I., & Iversen, S. D.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1975-01
Volume
83
Issue
3
Pages
419-436
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092998813
Cited by
583
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
14.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
amphetamine, substantia nigra, 6-hydroxydopamine lesion, norepinephrine depletion, noradrenergic pathways, locomotor response, stereotypy, L-DOPA, cocaine, dopamine
MeSH terms
Animals, Apomorphine, Behavior, Animal, Body Weight, Cerebral Cortex, Cocaine, Dextroamphetamine, Drinking Behavior, Feeding Behavior, Humans, Hydroxydopamines, Levodopa, Locomotion, Male, Neural Pathways, Norepinephrine, Receptors, Adrenergic, Stereotyped Behavior, Stimulation, Chemical, Substantia Nigra, Tyrosine 3-Monooxygenase, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review