Cited by 295Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Treatment

Hyperexcitable C nociceptors in fibromyalgia

Serra, Jordi, Collado, Antonio, Solà, Romà, Antonelli, Francesca, Torres, Xavier, Salgueiro, Monika, Quiles, Cristina, Bostock, Hugh·2014·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that peripheral C nociceptor function may be abnormal in fibromyalgia and that C nociceptor dysfunction may contribute to the symptoms reported by these patients. METHODS: Microneurography was used to record C nociceptors of 30 female patients meeting criteria for fibromyalgia and compared with recordings from 17 female patients with small-fiber neuropathy and 9 female controls. RESULTS: We obtained stable recordings of 186 C nociceptors in the fibromyalgia group, 114 from small-fiber neuropathy patients, and 66 from controls. The mechanosensitive nociceptors in the fibromyalgia patients behaved normally, but the silent nociceptors in 76.6% of fibromyalgia patients exhibited abnormalities. Spontaneous activity was detected in 31% of silent nociceptors in fibromyalgia, 34% in small-fiber neuropathy, and 2.2% in controls. Sensitization to mechanical stimulation was found in 24.2% of silent nociceptors in fibromyalgia, 22.7% in small-fiber neuropathy, and 3.7% in controls. Abnormally high slowing of conduction velocity when first stimulated at 0.25Hz was more common in fibromyalgia. INTERPRETATION: We show for the first time that the majority of fibromyalgia patients have abnormal C nociceptors. Many silent nociceptors exhibit hyperexcitability resembling that in small-fiber neuropathy, but high activity-dependent slowing of conduction velocity is more common in fibromyalgia patients, and may constitute a distinguishing feature. We infer that ab…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.24065

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Peripheral nervous system involvement in a subgroup of women with fibromyalgia syndrome provided a new perspective.

    “peripheral nervous system involvement in a subgroup of women with FMS provided a new perspective32,41,50”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Serra, J., Collado, A., Solà, R., Antonelli, F., Torres, X., Salgueiro, M., Quiles, C., & Bostock, H.
Affiliations
  • Parc Científic de Barcelona (ES)
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
Corresponding author
Serra, Jordi
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-02
Volume
75
Issue
2
Pages
196-208
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W1567257801
Cited by
295
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 19
FWCI
16.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
fibromyalgia, C nociceptors, hyperexcitability, spontaneous activity, mechanical sensitivity, small fiber neuropathy
MeSH terms
Adult, Biophysics, Electric Stimulation, Female, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Hyperalgesia, Middle Aged, Neural Conduction, Nociceptors, Cohort Studies, Case-Control Studies, Pain Threshold, Nerve Fibers, Unmyelinated, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review