Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 240

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dynamic Imaging of Individual Remyelination Profiles in Multiple Sclerosis

Open access
Bodini, Benedetta, Veronese, Mattia, García‐Lorenzo, Daniel, Battaglini, Marco, Poirion, Emilie, Chardain, Audrey, Freeman, Léorah, Louapre, Céline, Tchikviladze, Maya, Papeix, Caroline, Dollé, Frédéric, Zalc, Bernard, Lubetzki, Catherine, Bottlaender, Michel, Turkheimer, Federico, Stankoff, Bruno·2016·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Background: Quantitative in vivo imaging of myelin loss and repair in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) is essential to understand the pathogenesis of the disease and to evaluate promyelinating therapies. Selectively binding myelin in the central nervous system white matter, Pittsburgh compound B ([11 C]PiB) can be used as a positron emission tomography (PET) tracer to explore myelin dynamics in MS. Methods: Patients with active relapsing‐remitting MS (n = 20) and healthy controls (n = 8) were included in a longitudinal trial combining PET with [11 C]PiB and magnetic resonance imaging. Voxel‐wise maps of [11 C]PiB distribution volume ratio, reflecting myelin content, were derived. Three dynamic indices were calculated for each patient: the global index of myelin content change; the index of demyelination; and the index of remyelination. Results: At baseline, there was a progressive reduction in [11 C]PiB binding from the normal‐appearing white matter to MS lesions, reflecting a decline in myelin content. White matter lesions were characterized by a centripetal decrease in the tracer binding at the voxel level. During follow‐up, high between‐patient variability was found for all indices of myelin content change. Dynamic remyelination was inversely correlated with clinical disability (p = 0.006 and beta‐coefficient = –0.67 with the Expanded Disability Status Scale; p = 0.003 and beta‐coefficient = –0.68 with the MS Severity Scale), whereas no significant clinical correlation was found for the demyelination index. Interpretation: [11 C]PiB PET allows quantification of myelin dynamics in MS and enables stratification of patients depending on their individual remyelination potential, which significantly correlates with clinical disability. This technique should be considered to assess novel promyelinating drugs. Ann Neurol 2016;79:726–738

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.24620

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 240

Metadata

Authors
Bodini, B., Veronese, M., García‐Lorenzo, D., Battaglini, M., Poirion, E., Chardain, A., Freeman, L., Louapre, C., Tchikviladze, M., Papeix, C., Dollé, F., Zalc, B., Lubetzki, C., Bottlaender, M., Turkheimer, F., & Stankoff, B.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-05
Volume
79
Issue
5
Pages
726-738
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2280588432
Cited by
240
References
4
FWCI
15.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic Imaging of Individual Remyelination Profiles in Multiple Sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.24620
The paper
Bodini, B., Veronese, M., García‐Lorenzo, D., Battaglini, M., Poirion, E., Chardain, A., Freeman, L., Louapre, C., Tchikviladze, M., Papeix, C., Dollé, F., Zalc, B., Lubetzki, C., Bottlaender, M., Turkheimer, F., & Stankoff, B. (2016). Dynamic Imaging of Individual Remyelination Profiles in Multiple Sclerosis. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24620

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.