Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 450

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep gray matter volume loss drives disability worsening in multiple sclerosis

Open access
Eshaghi, Arman, Prados, Ferran, Brownlee, Wallace J., Altmann, Daniel R., Tur, Carmen, Cardoso, M. Jorge, De Angelis, Floriana, van de Pavert, Steven H., Cawley, Niamh, De Stefano, Nicola, Stromillo, M. Laura, Battaglini, Marco, Ruggieri, Serena, Gasperini, Claudio, Filippi, Massimo, Rocca, Maria A., Rovira, Alex, Sastre‐Garriga, Jaume, Vrenken, Hugo, Leurs, Cyra E., Killestein, Joep, Pirpamer, Lukas, Enzinger, Christian, Ourselin, Sebastien, Wheeler‐Kingshott, Claudia A.M. Gandini, Chard, Declan, Thompson, Alan J., Alexander, Daniel C., Barkhof, Frederik, Ciccarelli, Olga, on behalf of the MAGNIMS study group·2018·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: Gray matter (GM) atrophy occurs in all multiple sclerosis (MS) phenotypes. We investigated whether there is a spatiotemporal pattern of GM atrophy that is associated with faster disability accumulation in MS. Methods: We analyzed 3,604 brain high‐resolution T1‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans from 1,417 participants: 1,214 MS patients (253 clinically isolated syndrome [CIS], 708 relapsing‐remitting [RRMS], 128 secondary‐progressive [SPMS], and 125 primary‐progressive [PPMS]), over an average follow‐up of 2.41 years (standard deviation [SD] = 1.97), and 203 healthy controls (HCs; average follow‐up = 1.83 year; SD = 1.77), attending seven European centers. Disability was assessed with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). We obtained volumes of the deep GM (DGM), temporal, frontal, parietal, occipital and cerebellar GM, brainstem, and cerebral white matter. Hierarchical mixed models assessed annual percentage rate of regional tissue loss and identified regional volumes associated with time‐to‐EDSS progression. Results: SPMS showed the lowest baseline volumes of cortical GM and DGM. Of all baseline regional volumes, only that of the DGM predicted time‐to‐EDSS progression (hazard ratio = 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.65, 0.82; p < 0.001): for every standard deviation decrease in baseline DGM volume, the risk of presenting a shorter time to EDSS worsening during follow‐up increased by 27%. Of all longitudinal measures, DGM showed the fastest annual rate of atrophy, which was faster in SPMS (–1.45%), PPMS (–1.66%), and RRMS (–1.34%) than CIS (–0.88%) and HCs (–0.94%; p < 0.01). The rate of temporal GM atrophy in SPMS (–1.21%) was significantly faster than RRMS (–0.76%), CIS (–0.75%), and HCs (–0.51%). Similarly, the rate of parietal GM atrophy in SPMS (–1.24‐%) was faster than CIS (–0.63%) and HCs (–0.23%; all p values <0.05). Only the atrophy rate in DGM in patients was significantly associated with disability accumulation (beta = 0.04; p < 0.001). Interpretation: This large, multicenter and longitudinal study shows that DGM volume loss drives disability accumulation in MS, and that temporal cortical GM shows accelerated atrophy in SPMS than RRMS. The difference in regional GM atrophy development between phenotypes needs to be taken into account when evaluating treatment effect of therapeutic interventions. Ann Neurol 2018;83:210–222

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.25145

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Cited by

See all 450

Metadata

Authors
Eshaghi, A., Prados, F., Brownlee, W. J., Altmann, D. R., Tur, C., Cardoso, M. J., De Angelis, F., van de Pavert, S. H., Cawley, N., De Stefano, N., Stromillo, M. L., Battaglini, M., Ruggieri, S., Gasperini, C., Filippi, M., Rocca, M. A., Rovira, A., Sastre‐Garriga, J., Vrenken, H., Leurs, C. E., Killestein, J., Pirpamer, L., Enzinger, C., Ourselin, S., Wheeler‐Kingshott, C. A. M. G., Chard, D., Thompson, A. J., Alexander, D. C., Barkhof, F., Ciccarelli, O., & on behalf of the MAGNIMS study group
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-02
Volume
83
Issue
2
Pages
210-222
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2752554587
Cited by
450
References
69
FWCI
28.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep gray matter volume loss drives disability worsening in multiple sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.25145
The paper
Eshaghi, A., Prados, F., Brownlee, W. J., Altmann, D. R., Tur, C., Cardoso, M. J., De Angelis, F., van de Pavert, S. H., Cawley, N., De Stefano, N., Stromillo, M. L., Battaglini, M., Ruggieri, S., Gasperini, C., Filippi, M., Rocca, M. A., Rovira, A., Sastre‐Garriga, J., Vrenken, H., . . . on behalf of the MAGNIMS study group. (2018). Deep gray matter volume loss drives disability worsening in multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25145

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.