The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visual dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease: Relation to normal aging
Abstract
In patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), compared with age‐matched and young healthy control subjects, visual deficits in the following functions were observed: color, stereoacuity, contrast sensitivity, and backward masking (homogeneous and pattern). Critical flicker fusion thresholds were normal, relative to age‐matched healthy subjects. For color, the majority of the errors were tritanomalous (blue axis). Color and stereoacuity deficits were unrelated to severity of dementia, in accordance with models of vision that describe these functions as modular rather than diffuse for cortical localization. Although contrast sensitivity was depressed throughout the frequency range in AD, more patients were impaired at low than at high spatial frequencies, contrasting with the observed normal aging pattern of high‐frequency loss. Healthy elderly subjects showed depressed critical flicker fusion thresholds and reduced contrast sensitivity at high frequencies, relative to the young group; differences between these groups were not found for the other vision tests. A subset of the AD group received detailed neuro‐ophthalmological examination, and no abnormalities were found. This finding, taken together with normal thresholds for critical flicker fusion, suggests that the widespread visual dysfunction reported here is more likely to be related to known pathological changes in primary visual and association cortex in AD than to changes in the retina or optic nerve.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Blessed, G., Tomlinson, B. E., & Roth, M. (1968) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.114.512.797 · Cited by 4,117
Cited by
At the interface of sensory and motor dysfunctions and Alzheimer’s disease.
Albers, M. W., Gilmore, G. C., Kaye, J., Murphy, C., Wingfield, A., Bennett, D. A., Boxer, A. L., Buchman, A. S., Cruickshanks, K. J., Devanand, D. P., et al. (2015) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2014.04.514 · Cited by 589
Vision and cognition in Alzheimer’s disease
Rizzo, M. (2000) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00023-3 · Cited by 308
Visual dysfunction, neurodegenerative diseases, and aging
Jackson, G. R., & Owsley, C. (2003) · Neurologic Clinics · doi:10.1016/s0733-8619(02)00107-x · Cited by 226
Ocular changes in TgF344-AD rat model of Alzheimer's disease
Tsai, Y., Lu, B., Ljubimov, A. V., Girman, S., Ross-Cisneros, F. N., Sadun, A. A., Svendsen, C. N., Cohen, R. M., & Wang, S. (2014) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.13-12888 · Cited by 153
Chang, L. Y. L., Lowe, J., Ardiles, A., Lim, J., Grey, A. C., Robertson, K., Danesh‐Meyer, H., Palacios, A. G., & Acosta, M. L. (2014) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2013.06.004 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Cronin‐Golomb, A., Corkin, S., Rizzo, J. F., Cohen, J., Growdon, J. H., & Banks, K. S.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-52
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2011885528
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.