Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 293

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical determinants of dememtia related to stroke

Tatemichi, T. K., Desmond, D. W., Paik, M., Figueroa, M., Gropen, T. I., Stern, Y., Sano, M., Remien, R., Williams, J. B. W., Mohr, J. P., Mayeux, R.·1993·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Among 251 patients examined 3 months after the onset of acute ischemic stroke, we diagnosed dementia in 66(26.3%) by using modified DSM‐III‐R criteria based on neuropsychological, neurological, functional, and psychiatric examinations. We uses a logistic regression model to derive odds rations(ORs) for clinical factors independently related to dementia in this cross‐sectional sample. Dementia was significantly associated with age, education, and race. A history of prior stroke (OR= 2.7) and diabetes mellitus (OR=2.6) was also independently related to dementia, but hypertension and cardiac disease were not. Stroke fearures associated with dementia included lacunar infarction compared with all other subtypes combined (OR=2.7) was also independently related to dementia, but hypertension and cardiac disease were not. Stroke features associated with dementia included lacunar infarction compared with all other subtypes combined (OR= 2.7) and hemisphetic laterality in relarion to brainstem or cerebellar location. There was a predominance of dementia in patients with left‐sided lesions(Or‐4.7), an effect not explained by aphasis. Dementia was especially common with infarctions in the left posterior cerebral and anterior cerebral artery territories. A major dominant hemispheral syndrome (reflecting size and laterality) was also independently associated with dementia (OR=3.9). We suggest that dementia after ischemic stroke is a result of multiple independent factors, including both small subcrtical and large cortical infarcts especially involving the left medial frontal and temporal regions, with additional contributions by demographic and vascular risk factors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.410330603

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1987.tb03599.x · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0033-3182(87)72553-5 · DOI
  3. 10.1001/archneur.1975.00490510088009 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1136/jnnp.41.10.903 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/BF00395221 · doi:10.1007/bf00395221
  6. Goodglass H, 1983, The assessment of aphasia and related disorders
  7. Mahoney FI, 1965, Functional evaluation: Barthel index, Md State Med J, 14, 61
  8. 10.1161/01.STR.19.5.547 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1001/archneur.1983.04050030032005 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Mohr JP, 1984, Classification and diagnosis of stroke, Int J Angilo, 3, 431
  11. 10.1001/archneur.1992.00530290035009 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1037/1040-3590.2.3.243 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/brain/75.3.292 · DOI
  14. 10.1192/bjp.110.466.310 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/brain/96.4.715 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1136/jnnp.45.2.97 · DOI
  17. 10.1212/WNL.42.1.138 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1161/01.STR.23.6.804 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/brain/104.4.721 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/brain/107.1.81 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1192/bjp.148.5.541 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1212/WNL.36.2.178 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/scientificamerican0687-80 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/0165-0173(88)90012-4 · DOI
  25. Graft‐Radford NR, 1985, Nonhemorrhagic thalamic infarction. Clinical, neuropsychological and electrophysiological findings in four anatomical groups defined by computerized tomography, Brain, 108, 485
  26. 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1974.tb02767.x · DOI
  27. 10.1093/brain/110.5.1099 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Faris AA, 1967, Limbic system infarction, J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 26, 174
  29. Stuss DT, 1986, The frontal lobes
  30. 10.1161/01.STR.21.6.858 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1136/jnnp.51.8.1037 · DOI
  32. Marie P, 1901, Des foyers lacunaires de désintegration et de different autres états cavitaires du cerveau, Rev Med (Pairs), 21, 281
  33. 10.1212/WNL.15.8.774 · DOI
  34. Roman CG, 1985, Senile dementia of the Alzheimer type, 131
  35. 10.1161/01.STR.21.7.1013 · DOI
  36. 10.1001/archneur.1990.00530020025010 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1212/WNL.42.10.1966 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1212/WNL.40.11.1652 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/S0140-6736(74)91496-2 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1161/01.STR.20.7.850 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1002/ana.410250402 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1037/10017-000 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Grafman J, 1985, The relationship of brain‐tissue loss volume and lesion location to cognitive deficit, J Neurosci, 6, 301, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.06-02-00301.1986 · DOI
  44. Piercy M, 1969, Handbook of clinical neurology, 296
  45. 10.1002/ana.410320311 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 293

Metadata

Authors
Tatemichi, T. K., Desmond, D. W., Paik, M., Figueroa, M., Gropen, T. I., Stern, Y., Sano, M., Remien, R., Williams, J. B. W., Mohr, J. P., & Mayeux, R.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-06
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
568-575
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2039987972
Cited by
293
References
4
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical determinants of dememtia related to stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410330603
The paper
Tatemichi, T. K., Desmond, D. W., Paik, M., Figueroa, M., Gropen, T. I., Stern, Y., Sano, M., Remien, R., Williams, J. B. W., Mohr, J. P., & Mayeux, R. (1993). Clinical determinants of dememtia related to stroke. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410330603

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.