Cited by 295

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

When does human brain development end? Evidence of corpus callosum growth up to adulthood

Pujol, Jesús, Vendrell, Pere, Junqué, Carme, Martí‐Vilalta, Josep L., Capdevila, Antoni·1993·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

To locate structural changes in the brain accounting for the increasing effectiveness in cognition and skills that occurs at the final stage of behavioral development, we attempted to determine the age at which the corpus callosum completes its active growth period. We assessed the growth rate of the corpus callosum by measuring its area twice on midsagittal magnetic resonance imaging scans separated by a 2‐year interval, in a series of 90 subjects with a wide range of ages. We observed an increase in the size of the corpus callosum as long as human mentation expands, up to the middle 20s. Clinical and experimental data about the corpus callosum, together with the present findings, suggest that the corpus callosum is part of the highest order‐latest maturing neural network of the brain.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.410340113

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. 10.1007/978-1-4684-5577-9_14 · DOI
  2. Commons ML, 1984, Beyond formal operations. Late adolescent and adult cognitive development
  3. Albert MS, 1988, Geriatric neuropsychology, 13
  4. 10.1007/978-1-4613-2419-5_2 · DOI
  5. Barkovich AJ, 1988, Normal postnatal development of the corpus callosum as demonstrated by MR imaging, AJNR, 9, 487
  6. 10.2214/ajr.151.4.791 · DOI
  7. 10.1212/WNL.37.7.1240 · DOI
  8. 10.1148/radiology.176.1.2353093 · DOI
  9. Wechsler D, 1981, Wechsler adult intelligence scale‐revised
  10. 10.1093/geronj/43.5.P113 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/cne.902480304 · DOI
  12. Yakovlev PI, 1967, Regional development of the brain in early life, 3
  13. 10.1148/radiology.166.1.3336675 · DOI
  14. Bird CR, 1989, MR assessment of myelination in infants and children: usefulness of marker sites, AJNR, 10, 731
  15. 10.1097/00004728-198811000-00002 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1991.tb14793.x · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1990.tb16956.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1007/978-3-662-02568-0_3 · DOI
  19. Curnes JT, 1988, MR imaging of compact white matter pathways, AJNR, 9, 1061
  20. 10.1148/radiology.172.1.2740500 · DOI
  21. Simon JH, 1987, Quantitative determination of MS‐induced corpus callosum atrophy in vivo using MR imaging, AJR, 8, 599

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 295

Metadata

Authors
Pujol, J., Vendrell, P., Junqué, C., Martí‐Vilalta, J. L., & Capdevila, A.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-07
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
71-75
ISSN
  • 0364-5134
  • 1531-8249
Cited by
295
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review