Cited by 679Carbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsCarbon dioxide utilization in catalysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 252 of the 267 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sorbents for the Direct Capture of CO 2 from Ambient Air

Abstract

Abstract The urgency to address global climate change induced by greenhouse gas emissions is increasing. In particular, the rise in atmospheric CO 2 levels is generating alarm. Technologies to remove CO 2 from ambient air, or “direct air capture” (DAC), have recently demonstrated that they can contribute to “negative carbon emission.” Recent advances in surface chemistry and material synthesis have resulted in new generations of CO 2 sorbents, which may drive the future of DAC and its large‐scale deployment. This Review describes major types of sorbents designed to capture CO 2 from ambient air and they are categorized by the sorption mechanism: physisorption, chemisorption, and moisture‐swing sorption.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/anie.201906756

Cites

252 of 252 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

15 of the 267 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Lackner K. S., 2015, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc., 60
  2. Zeman F. S., 2004, World Resource Rev., 16, 157
  3. Wurzbacher J., 2017, Capturing CO2 from air, 499
  4. 10.1007/s10584-005-9026-x · DOI
  5. Hoddenbagh J., 2002, Pulp Pap. Can., 103, 16
  6. E. National Academies of Sciences Medicine Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration: A Research Agenda The National Academies Press Washington 2019.
  7. Mohamedali M., 2016, Greenhouse Gases
  8. Sujan A., 2019, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng.
  9. 10.1002/cssc.201000355 · DOI
  10. 10.1021/ie060774 · DOI
  11. 10.1039/C1CP23366A · DOI
  12. 10.1002/anie.201507846 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/ange.201507846 · DOI
  14. X. Shi H. Xiao X. Chen K. Lackner arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.003882017.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 679

Metadata

Authors
Shi, X., Xiao, H., Azarabadi, H., Song, J., Wu, X., Chen, X., & Lackner, K. S.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
  • Northwest University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Chen, Xi
  • Lackner, Klaus S.
Venue
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-02-20
Volume
59
Issue
18
Pages
6984-7006
ISSN
  • 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3773
OpenAlex
W2965283917
Cited by
679
References
267
Citations by year
2026: 106 · 2025: 132 · 2024: 120 · 2023: 133 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 31
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Arizona State University (Center for Negative Carbon Emissions)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
Keywords
direct air capture, CO2 sorbents, carbon dioxide removal, physisorption, chemisorption, surface chemistry, materials synthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review