Cited by 182Advancements in Battery MaterialsAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies

Exploiting Mechanistic Solvation Kinetics for Dual‐Graphite Batteries with High Power Output at Extremely Low Temperature

Open access
Holoubek, John, Yin, Yijie, Li, Mingqian, Yu, Mingyu, Meng, Ying Shirley, Liu, Ping, Chen, Zheng·2019·Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Abstract

Improving the extremely low temperature operation of rechargeable batteries is vital to the operation of electronics in extreme environments, where systems capable of high‐rate discharge are in short supply. Herein, we demonstrate the holistic design of dual‐graphite batteries, which circumvent the sluggish ion‐desolvation process found in typical lithium‐ion batteries during discharge. These batteries were enabled by a novel electrolyte, which simultaneously provides high electrochemical stability and ionic conductivity at low temperature. The dual‐graphite cells, when compared to industry‐type graphite ∥ LiCoO 2 full‐cells demonstrated an 11 times increased capacity retention at −60 °C for a 10 C discharge rate, indicative of the superior kinetics of the “dual‐ion” storage mechanism. These trends are further supported by galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (GITT) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements at reduced temperature. This work provides a new design strategy for extreme low‐temperature batteries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/anie.201912167

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High oxidation stability of the methyl propionate-based electrolyte enabled stable graphite||graphite cycling with an upper voltage cutoff at 5.2 V for storage of PF6- anion in graphite at the cathode side.

    “Meanwhile, high oxidation stability of this electrolyte enabled stable graphite||graphite cycling with the upper voltage cutoff at 5.2 V for the storage of PF 6 -anion in graphite at the cathode side.”

    From Review on Low-Temperature Electrolytes for Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries (2023) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Accepted Manuscript reports high oxidative stability for the MP-based electrolyte containing 10% FEC. The Angewandte Chemie International Edition section reports stable graphite||graphite full-cell cycling and PF6− storage in graphite at approximately 4.6–5.2 V versus Li/Li+. It does not identify 5.2 V as the full cell’s upper voltage cutoff; that number describes the positive electrode’s potential versus Li/Li+. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A graphite||graphite dual-ion battery retained 93.1% and 84.4% of its room-temperature capacity at -40 and -60 °C, respectively.

    “As a result, this graphite||graphite dual-ion battery (DIB) retained 93.1% and 84.4% of its RT capacity at -40 and -60 °C, respectively (Fig. 6b).”
  • A stable interphase formed by fluoroethylene carbonate combined with high bulk electrolyte conductivity contributed by methyl propionate enabled greatly improved performance, delivering over 60% room-temperature capacity at -60 °C and 1 C rate.

    “The stable interphase formed by FEC combined with high bulk electrolyte conductivity contributed by MP enabled greatly improved performance, delivering over 60% RT capacity at -60 °C and 1 C rate (Fig. 6a).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. M. Winter, B. Barnett, K. Xu, Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 11433-11456;
  2. J. B. Goodenough, Y. Kim, Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 587-603.
  3. M. C. Smart, B. V. Ratnakumar, R. C. Ewell, S. Surampudi, F. J. Puglia, R. Gitzendanner, Electrochim. Acta 2018, 268, 27-40;
  4. K. B. Chin, E. J. Brandon, R. V. Bugga, M. C. Smart, S. C. Jones, F. C. Krause, W. C. West, G. G. Bolotin, Proc. of the IEEE 2018, 106, 419-428;
  5. J. Jaguemont, L. Boulon, Y. Dubé, Applied Energy 2016, 164, 99-114;
  6. C.-K. Huang, J. S. Sakamoto, J. Wolfenstine, S. Surampudi, J. Electrochem. Soc. 2000, 147, 2893-2896;
  7. G. Zhu, K. Wen, W. Lv, X. Zhou, Y. Liang, F. Yang, Z. Chen, M. Zou, J. Li, Y. Zhang, et al., J. Power Sources 2015, 300, 29-40;
  8. S. S. Zhang, K. Xu, T. R. Jow, Electrochim. Acta 2002, 48, 241-246.
  9. G. Nagasubramanian, J. Appl. Electrochem. 2001, 31, 99-104.
  10. Y. Ji, C. Y. Wang, Electrochim. Acta 2013, 107, 664-674;
  11. C.-Y. Wang, G. Zhang, S. Ge, T. Xu, Y. Ji, X.-G. Yang, Y. Leng, Nature 2016, 529, 515-518.
  12. S. S. Zhang, K. Xu, T. R. Jow, J. Power Sources 2003, 115, 137-140;
  13. Q. Li, D. Lu, J. Zheng, S. Jiao, L. Luo, C.-M. Wang, K. Xu, J.-G. Zhang, W. Xu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 42761-42768.
  14. X. Dong, Z. Guo, Z. Guo, Y. Wang, Y. Xia, Joule 2018, 2, 902-913;
  15. X. Dong, Y. Lin, P. Li, Y. Ma, J. Huang, D. Bin, Y. Wang, Y. Qi, Y. Xia, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 5623- 5627;
  16. M. C. Smart, B. V. Ratnakumar, K. B. Chin, L. D. Whitcanack, J. Electrochem. Soc. 2010, 157, A1361-A1374;
  17. C. S. Rustomji, Y. Yang, T. K. Kim, J. Mac, Y. J. Kim, E. Caldwell, H. Chung, Y. S. Meng, Science 2017, eaal4263; e) M. C. Smart, B. L. Lucht, S. Dalavi, F. C. Krause, B. V. Ratnakumar, J. Electrochem. Soc. 2012, 159, A739-A751;
  18. E. J. Plichta, M. Hendrickson, R. Thompson, G. Au, W. K. Behl, M. C. Smart, B. V. Ratnakumar, S. Surampudi, J. Power Sources 2001, 94, 160-162;
  19. D. Yaakov, Y. Gofer, D. Aurbach, I. C. Halalay, J. Electrochem. Soc. 2010, 157, A1383-A1391. 10.1002/anie.201912167 Accepted Manuscript
  20. B. Liao, H. Li, M. Xu, L. Xing, Y. Liao, X. Ren, W. Fan, L. Yu, K. Xu, W. Li, Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1800802.
  21. M. Wang, Y. Tang, Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1703320;
  22. I. A. Rodríguez-Pérez, X. Ji, ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 1762-1770.
  23. Y. Aihara, T. Bando, H. Nakagawa, H. Yoshida, K. Hayamizu, E. Akiba, W. S. Price, J. Electrochem. Soc. 2004, 151, A119-A122;
  24. J. O. Bockris, A. K. N. Reddy, M. E. Gamboa- Aldeco, Modern Electrochemistry 2A: Fundamentals of Electrodics, Springer US, 2000.
  25. S. Muench, A. Wild, C. Friebe, B. Häupler, T. Janoschka, U. S. Schubert, Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 9438-9484;
  26. J. K. Feng, Y. L. Cao, X. P. Ai, H. X. Yang, J. Power Sources 2008, 177, 199-204;
  27. C. Su, F. Yang, L. Ji, L. Xu, C. Zhang, J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 20083-20088;
  28. L. Fan, Q. Liu, Z. Xu, B. Lu, ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 1614-1620.
  29. M. L. Aubrey, J. R. Long, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 13594-13602;
  30. S. Dühnen, R. Nölle, J. Wrogemann, M. Winter, T. Placke, J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166, A5474-A5482.
  31. C. Yang, J. Chen, X. Ji, T. P. Pollard, X. Lü, C.-J. Sun, S. Hou, Q. Liu, C. Liu, T. Qing, et al., Nature 2019, 569, 245-250.
  32. G. Wang, M. Yu, J. Wang, D. Li, D. Tan, M. Löffler, X. Zhuang, K. Müllen, X. Feng, Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1800533;
  33. K. V. Kravchyk, P. Bhauriyal, L. Piveteau, C. P. Guntlin, B. Pathak, M. V. Kovalenko, Nat. Commun.2018, 9, 4469;
  34. J. A. Seel, J. R. Dahn, J. Electrochem. Soc. 2000, 147, 892-898;
  35. X. Zhang, Y. Tang, F. Zhang, C.-S. Lee, Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1502588;
  36. T. Placke, O. Fromm, S. F. Lux, P. Bieker, S. Rothermel, H.-W. Meyer, S. Passerini, M. Winter, J. Electrochem. Soc. 2012, 159, A1755-A1765;
  37. S. Miyoshi, H. Nagano, T. Fukuda, T. Kurihara, M. Watanabe, S. Ida, T. Ishihara, J. Electrochem. Soc. 2016, 163, A1206-A1213;
  38. H. Fan, L. Qi, H. Wang, Solid State Ionics 2017, 300, 169-174;
  39. Y. Huang, H. Fan, H. Kamezaki, B. Kang, M. Yoshio, H. Wang, ChemElectroChem 2019, 6, 2931-2936;
  40. J. Lang, J. Li, F. Zhang, X. Ding, J. A. Zapien, Y. Tang, Batteries & Supercaps 2019, 2, 440-447;
  41. M. Wang, C. Jiang, S. Zhang, X. Song, Y. Tang, H.-M. Cheng, Nature Chem. 2018, 10, 667-672;
  42. C. Jiang, Y. Fang, W. Zhang, X. Song, J. Lang, L. Shi, Y. Tang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 16370-16374;
  43. Jiao, J. Tu, Y. Liu, D.-N. Fang, Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1606349;
  44. Z. Zhou, N. Li, Y. Yang, H. Chen, S. Jiao, W.-L. Song, D. Fang, Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1801439;
  45. Z. Yu, S. Jiao, S. Li, X. Chen, W.-L. Song, T. Teng, J. Tu, H.-S. Chen, G. Zhang, D.-N. Fang, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1806799.
  46. H. Shin, J. Park, A. M. Sastry, W. Lu, J. Electrochem. Soc. 2015, 162, A1683-A1692;
  47. X. Fan, L. Chen, O. Borodin, X. Ji, J. Chen, S. Hou, T. Deng, J. Zheng, C. Yang, S.-C. Liou, et al., Nat. Nanotech. 2018, 13, 715-722;
  48. E. Markevich, G. Salitra, K. Fridman, R. Sharabi, G. Gershinsky, A. Garsuch, G. Semrau, M. A. Schmidt, D. Aurbach, Langmuir 2014, 30, 7414-7424;
  49. E. Markevich, G. Salitra, D. Aurbach, ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 1337-1345;
  50. B. Heidrich, A. Heckmann, K. Beltrop, M. Winter, T. Placke, Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 21, 414-426.
  51. J. Betz, G. Bieker, P. Meister, T. Placke, M. Winter, R. Schmuch, Advanced Energy Materials 2019, 9, 1803170;
  52. T. Placke, A. Heckmann, R. Schmuch, P. Meister, K. Beltrop, M. Winter, Joule 2018, 2, 2528-2550.
  53. S. Cui, Y. Wei, T. Liu, W. Deng, Z. Hu, Y. Su, H. Li, M. Li, H. Guo, Y. Duan, et al., Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1501309.
  54. Q. Liu, X. Su, D. Lei, Y. Qin, J. Wen, F. Guo, Y. A. Wu, Y. Rong, R. Kou, X. Xiao, et al., Nat. Energy 2018, 3, 936-943.
  55. M. Okubo, Y. Tanaka, H. Zhou, T. Kudo, I. Honma, J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 2840- 2847;
  56. A. Heckmann, P. Meister, L.-Y. Kuo, M. Winter, P. Kaghazchi, T. Placke, Electrochimica Acta 2018, 284, 669-680.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holoubek, J., Yin, Y., Li, M., Yu, M., Meng, Y. S., Liu, P., & Chen, Z.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
  • Liu, Ping
  • Chen, Zheng
Venue
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-11-11
Volume
58
Issue
52
Pages
18892-18897
ISSN
  • 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3773
OpenAlex
W2981858414
Cited by
182
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 15
FWCI
7.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (ECF 80NSSC18K1512)
  • National Nanotechnology Coordinating Office (ECCS-1542148)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Keywords
low-temperature battery operation, ion desolvation, electrolyte design, ionic conductivity, electrochemical stability window, high-rate discharge, capacity retention, lithium-ion batteries, graphite electrodes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review