The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reinventing residual reserves in the sea: are we favouring ease of establishment over need for protection?
Open accessAbstract
As systems of marine protected areas (MPAs) expand globally, there is a risk that new MPAs will be biased toward places that are remote or unpromising for extractive activities, and hence follow the trend of terrestrial protected areas in being ‘residual’ to commercial uses. Such locations typically provide little protection to the species and ecosystems that are most exposed to threatening processes. There are strong political motivations to establish residual reserves that minimize costs and conflicts with users of natural resources. These motivations will likely remain in place as long as success continues to be measured in terms of area (km 2) protected. The global pattern of MPAs was reviewed and appears to be residual, supported by a rapid growth of large, remote MPAs. The extent to which MPAs in Australia are residual nationally and also regionally within the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) Marine Park was also examined. Nationally, the recently announced Australian Commonwealth marine reserves were found to be strongly residual, making almost no difference to ‘business as usual’ for most ocean uses. Underlying this result was the imperative to minimize costs, but without the spatial constraints of explicit quantitative objectives for representing bioregions or the range of ecological features in highly protected zones. In contrast, the 2004 rezoning of the GBR was exemplary, and the potential for residual protection was limited by applying a systematic set of planning principles, such as representing a minimum percentage of finely subdivided bioregions. Nonetheless, even at this scale, protection was uneven between bioregions. Within‐bioregion heterogeneity might have led to no‐take zones being established in areas unsuitable for trawling with a risk that species assemblages differ between areas protected and areas left available for trawling. A simple four‐step framework of questions for planners and policy makers is proposed to help reverse the emerging residual tendency of MPAs and maximize their effectiveness for conservation. This involves checks on the least‐cost approach to establishing MPAs in order to avoid perverse outcomes. © 2014 The Authors. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems
Halpern, B. S., Walbridge, S., Selkoe, K. A., Kappel, C. V., Micheli, F., D'Agrosa, C., Bruno, J. F., Casey, K. S., Ebert, C., Fox, H. E., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1149345 · Cited by 6,627
Self-citationRapid Range Shifts of Species Associated with High Levels of Climate Warming
Chen, I.-C., Hill, J. K., Ohlemüller, R., Roy, D. B., & Thomas, C. D. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1206432 · Cited by 5,518
Systematic conservation planning
Margules, C. R., & Pressey, R. L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35012251 · Cited by 4,631
Self-citationGuidelines for applying protected area management categories
Dudley, N. (2008) · IUCN eBooks · doi:10.2305/iucn.ch.2008.paps.2.en · Cited by 2,988
Convention on Biological Diversity
Cropper, A. (1993) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892900023614 · Cited by 2,471
Projecting global marine biodiversity impacts under climate change scenarios
Cheung, W. W. L., Lam, V. W. Y., Sarmiento, J. L., Kearney, K., Watson, R., & Pauly, D. (2009) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00315.x · Cited by 1,626 · cited 2×
“Latitudinal shifts in species are already observed in many terrestrial (Chen et al., 2011) and marine (Cheung et al., 2009) ecosystems, and changes in ocean temperature and acidity will affect species and ecosystems in both coastal and remote oceanic environments.”
BackgroundSelf-citationMoney for Nothing? A Call for Empirical Evaluation of Biodiversity Conservation Investments
Ferraro, P. J., & Pattanayak, S. K. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040105 · Cited by 1,312
Biodiversity Conservation: Challenges Beyond 2010
Rands, M. R. W., Adams, W. M., Bennun, L., Butchart, S. H. M., Clements, A., Coomes, D., Entwistle, A., Hodge, I., Kapos, V., Scharlemann, J. P. W., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1189138 · Cited by 1,180
High and Far: Biases in the Location of Protected Areas
Joppa, L. N., & Pfaff, A. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008273 · Cited by 1,110
Beyond opportunism: Key principles for systematic reserve selection
Pressey, R. L., Humphries, C. J., Margules, C. R., Vane-Wright, R. I., & Williams, P. H. (1993) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(93)90023-i · Cited by 1,047
Self-citation
Cited by
The performance and potential of protected areas
Watson, J. E. M., Dudley, N., Segan, D. B., & Hockings, M. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13947 · Cited by 2,397
Protected area targets post-2020
Visconti, P., Butchart, S. H. M., Brooks, T. M., Langhammer, P. F., Marnewick, D., Vergara, S., Yanosky, A., & Watson, J. E. M. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aav6886 · Cited by 418
Migratory marine species: their status, threats and conservation management needs
Lascelles, B., Notarbartolo Di Sciara, G., Agardy, T., Cuttelod, A., Eckert, S., Glowka, L., Hoyt, E., Llewellyn, F., Louzao, M., Ridoux, V., et al. (2014) · Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems · doi:10.1002/aqc.2512 · Cited by 221
Metadata
- Authors
- Devillers, R., Pressey, R. L., Grech, A., Kittinger, J. N., Edgar, G. J., Ward, T., & Watson, R.
- Venue
- Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-02-25
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 480-504
- ISSN
- 1052-7613 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0755
- OpenAlex
- W1923495213
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 79
- FWCI
- 111.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reinventing residual reserves in the sea: are we favouring ease of establishment over need for protection? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aqc.2445
- The paper
- Devillers, R., Pressey, R. L., Grech, A., Kittinger, J. N., Edgar, G. J., Ward, T., & Watson, R. (2015). Reinventing residual reserves in the sea: are we favouring ease of establishment over need for protection? Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2445
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.