Cited by 108Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecologyEcology and biodiversity studiesHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes

Ditch communities: a major contributor to floodplain biodiversity

Armitage, Patrick D., Szoszkiewicz, Krzysztof, Blackburn, John H., Nesbitt, Ian·2003·Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

Abstract

Chalk stream floodplains are extensively managed and the high degree of connectivity associated with water meadows has been severely reduced. The main contributor to aquatic biodiversity is perceived to be the river itself. Ditches in these areas have been largely ignored as a contributor to total diversity. Separate surveys of instream, bankside and ditch macroinvertebrates in a small area of floodplain provided a unique opportunity to assess the relative contribution of each locality to total aquatic diversity. The fauna and flora of a ditch on the lower River Frome floodplain was examined and compared with studies of adjacent bankside and instream habitat. A total of 145 macroinvertebrate taxa and 61 plant species were recorded from the ditch. Faunal abundance and richness were positively related to the diversity of aquatic plants. The ditch showed a clear linear trend in community type that appeared to be partly related to the acidic seepage from tertiary deposits at the source and percentage cover of vegetation. There were large differences in the numbers of taxa collected in ditch, bankside, instream mesohabitat and RIVPACS surveys. Of the total 202 taxa recorded in the four surveys, the ditch contributed 59 unique taxa with 25 from the bankside and two and three from the mesohabitat and RIVPACS surveys, respectively. The large contribution of the Rushton Ditch to aquatic biodiversity on the floodplain is due to three main factors: the chemically different and slow‐flowing environment, the connection to the main river, and a management regime which has halted hydroseral succession at a point where vegetation structure is for the most part open and able to support a wide range of ecological niches. The maintenance of these conditions requires sensitive management and further knowledge of the needs and interactions of faunal communities with vegetation. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aqc.549

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many ditches represent novel ecosystems with distinct biotic communities.

    “Despite this, many ditches represent novel ecosystems with distinct biotic communities 21,[184][185][186] , and can support a high biodiversity of aquatic macroinvertebrates 106,187 ), waterbirds 188,189 , amphibians 190 , macrophytes 191,192 and fish 193,194 .”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [184]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Armitage, P. D., Szoszkiewicz, K., Blackburn, J. H., & Nesbitt, I.
Affiliations
  • Dorset Green Technology Park (GB)
  • Poznań University of Life Sciences (PL)
Corresponding author
Armitage, Patrick D.
Venue
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-09-26
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
165-185
ISSN
  • 1052-7613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0755
OpenAlex
W2017871146
Cited by
108
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Keywords
chalk streams, water meadows, macroinvertebrates, aquatic plants, River Frome, habitat connectivity, mesohabitats, floodplain management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review