Cited by 34Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecologyInvertebrate Taxonomy and EcologyEcology and biodiversity studies

Aquatic macroinvertebrate biodiversity associated with artificial agricultural drainage ditches

Open access
Hill, M. J., Chadd, R. P., Morris, N., Swaine, J. D., Wood, P. J.·2016·Hydrobiologia

Abstract

Agricultural drainage ditches are ubiquitous features in lowland agricultural landscapes, built primarily to facilitate land drainage, irrigate agricultural crops and alleviate flood risk. Most drainage ditches are considered artificial waterbodies and are not typically included in routine monitoring programmes, and as a result the faunal and floral communities they support are poorly quantified. This paper characterises the aquatic macroinvertebrate diversity (alpha, beta and gamma) of agricultural drainage ditches managed by an internal drainage board in Lincolnshire, UK. The drainage ditches support very diverse macroinvertebrate communities at both the site (alpha diversity) and landscape scale (gamma diversity) with the main arterial drainage ditches supporting greater numbers of taxa when compared to smaller side ditches. Examination of the between site community heterogeneity (beta diversity) indicated that differences among ditches were high spatially and temporally. The results illustrate that both main arterial and side ditches make a unique contribution to aquatic biodiversity of the agricultural landscape. Given the need to maintain drainage ditches to support agriculture and flood defence measures, we advocate the application of principles from ‘reconciliation ecology’ to inform the future management and conservation of drainage ditches.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10750-016-2757-z

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ditches can support a high biodiversity of aquatic macroinvertebrates, waterbirds, amphibians, macrophytes and fish.

    “and can support a high biodiversity of aquatic macroinvertebrates 106,187 ), waterbirds 188,189 , amphibians 190 , macrophytes 191,192 and fish 193,194 .”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [187]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. EU, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, 22/12/2000. Official Journal 327: 1-73.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hill, M. J., Chadd, R. P., Morris, N., Swaine, J. D., & Wood, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Loughborough University (GB)
  • Environment Agency (GB)
Corresponding author
Wood, P. J.
Venue
Hydrobiologia
Published
2016-04-16
Volume
776
Issue
1
Pages
249-260
ISSN
  • 0018-8158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5117
OpenAlex
W2336449597
Cited by
34
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hydrobiologia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Worcester Research and Publications (University of Worcester) (submittedVersion)
  • Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • School of Social, Political and Geographical Sciences, Loughborough University
  • Environment Agency of England and Wales
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
Keywords
agricultural drainage ditches, aquatic macroinvertebrates, biodiversity, alpha diversity, beta diversity, gamma diversity, reconciliation ecology, flood control, Lincolnshire

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review