Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,107

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Latent semantic analysis

Dumais, Susan T.·2004·Annual Review of Information Science and Technology
DOI 10.1002/aris.1440380105
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Annual Review of Information Science and TechnologyVolume 38, Issue 1 p. 188-230 Article Latent semantic analysis Susan T. Dumais, Susan T. Dumais Microsoft Research, Redmond, WashingtonSearch for more papers by this author Susan T. Dumais, Susan T. Dumais Microsoft Research, Redmond, WashingtonSearch for more papers by this author First published: 22 September 2005 https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440380105Citations: 509Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Citing Literature Volume38, Issue12004Pages 188-230 RelatedInformation

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aris.1440380105

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 129

  1. Aclioptas D. &McSherry F.(2001).Fast computation of low rank matrix approximations. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2001) 611–618. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Anderson J. R., 1989, Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honor of Endel Tulving, 195
  3. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00174.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. Ando R. K. &Lee L.(2001).Iterative residual rescaling: An analysis and generalization of LSI. Proceedings of the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 154–162. · DOI
  5. Azar Y. Fiat A. Karlin A. R. McSherry F. &Saia J.(2001). Spectral analysis of data.Proceedings of the 33rd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2001) 502–509. · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1145/321138.321148 · DOI
  7. Bartell B. T. Cottrell G. W. &Belew R. K.(1992). Latent semantic indexing is an optimal special case of multidimensional scaling.Proceedings of the 15th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 161–167. · DOI
  8. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198611)37:6<357::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI · Paper page
  9. Bates M., 1998, How to use controlled vocabularies more effectively in online searching, Online, 12, 45
  10. 10.1002/aris.1440360107 · DOI
  11. 10.1137/S0036144598347035 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1137/1037127 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1007/BF01829874 · DOI
  14. Bharat K. &Henzinger M.(1998). Improved algorithms for topic distillation in a hyperlinked environment.Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 104–111. · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1002/asi.4630250505 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1145/321160.321165 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Börner K.(2000). Extracting and visualizing semantic structures in retrieval results for browsing.Proceedings of the 2000 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries 234–235. · doi:10.1145/336597.336672
  18. Bush V., 1945, As we may think, Atlantic Monthly, 176, 101
  19. 10.1016/0306-4573(94)00056-9 · DOI
  20. Carbonell J. Yang Y. Frederking R. Brown R. D. Geng Y. &Lee D.(1997).Translingual information retrieval: A comparative evaluation. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI‐97) 323–345.
  21. Chan L. M., 1989, Inter‐indexer consistency in subject cataloging, Information Technology and Libraries, 8, 349
  22. 10.1016/S0306-4573(98)00068-5 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1109/2.910895 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Christianini N. Shawe‐Taylor J. &Lodhi H.(2001). Latent semantic kernels.Proceedings of ICML‐01 18th International Conference on Machine Learning 66–73.
  25. Cohn D. &Hofmann T.(2001).The missing link: A probabilistic model of document content and hypertext connectivity. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS*13) 430–436.
  26. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<391::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-9 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Deerwester S. Dumais S. Landauer T. Furnass G. &Beck L.(1988). Improving information retrieval with latent semantic indexing.Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science 25 36–40.
  28. Ding C. H. Q.(1999). A similarity‐based probability model for latent semantic indexing.Proceedings of 22nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 59–65. · DOI
  29. 10.1207/s15516709cog2703_7 · DOI
  30. 10.3758/BF03203370 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Dumais S. T., 1995, The Third Text REtrieval Conference (TREC3) National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 500–225, 219
  32. Dumais S. T. Furnas G. W. Landauer T. K. &Deerwester S.(1988).Using latent semantic analysis to improve information retrieval. Proceedings of CHI'88 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 281–285. · DOI · Paper page
  33. Dumais S. T., 1998, Cross‐language information retrieval, 51
  34. Dumais S. T. &Nielsen J.(1992).Automating the assignment of submitted manuscripts to reviewers.Proceedings of the 15th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 233–244. · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1076/jcen.24.1.26.965 · DOI
  36. Efron M., 2002, Amended parallel analysis for optimal dimensionality estimation in latent semantic indexing
  37. 10.1007/978-1-4615-5661-9_6 · DOI
  38. Fidel R.(1985). Individual variability in online searching behavior.Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science 69–72.
  39. 10.1145/138859.138866 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1080/01638539809545029 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Foltz P. W., 1999, The intelligent essay assessor: Applications to educational technology, Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer‐Enhanced Learning, 1
  42. French R. M. &Labiouse C.(2002). Four problems with extracting human semantics from large corpora.Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Society 316–320. · doi:10.4324/9781315782379-91
  43. Frieze A. Kannan R. &Vempala S.(1998). Fast monte‐carlo algorithms for finding low‐rank approximations.39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science 370–378. · doi:10.1109/sfcs.1998.743487
  44. 10.1145/32206.32212 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1145/345966.346008 · doi:10.1145/345966.346008
  46. 10.1162/neco.1991.3.3.293 · DOI
  47. Girolami M.(2000). Document representations based on generative multivariate Bernoulli latent topic models.Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Colloquium on Information Retrieval Research 194–201.
  48. Gollub G. H., 1989, Matrix computations
  49. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199806)49:8<674::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-T · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199806)49:8<674::aid-asi2>3.0.co;2-t
  50. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199602)47:2<116::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-1 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Graesser A. Wiemer‐Hastings P. Wiemer‐Hastings K. Harter D. Person N. &the Tutoring Research Group. (2000). Using latent semantic analysis to evaluate the contributions of students in AutoTutor.Interactive Learning Environments 129–148. · DOI · Paper page
  52. Griffiths T. L. &Steyvers M.(2002). A probabilistic approach to semantic representation.Proceedings of 24th Annual Cognitive Science Conference 381–386. · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199101)42:1<7::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI · Paper page
  54. Hofmann T.(1999). Probabilistic latent semantic analysis.Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 50–57. · DOI · Paper page
  55. Hofmann T. &Puzicha J.(1999). Latent class models for collaborative filtering.Proceedings of the International Joint Conference in Artificial Intelligence 688–693.
  56. Hull D. A.(1994). Improving text retrieval for the routing problem using latent semantic indexing.Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 282–290. · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-2099-5_29
  57. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199601)47:1<70::AID-ASI7>3.0.CO;2-# · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199601)47:1<70::aid-asi7>3.0.co;2-#
  58. Hull D. A. Pedersen J. O. &Schütze H.(1996). Method combination for document filtering.Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 279–288. · DOI
  59. Husbands P. Simon H. &Ding C.(2000 October). On the use of singular value decomposition for text retrieval. Proceedings of the 1st SIAM Computational Information Information Retrieval Workshop. Retrieved January 21 2003 fromhttp://www.nersc.gov/researcrch/SCG/cding//hsd4.ps
  60. Isbell C. L. &Viola P.(1998). Restructuring sparse high‐dimensional data for effective retrieval.Advances in Neural Information Processing NIPS‐11 480–486.
  61. Jardin N., 1971, The use of hierarchical clustering in information retrieval, Information Storage and Retrieval, 7, 214
  62. Jiang F., 1999, Efficient singularvalue decomposition via improved document sampling
  63. Jiang F. &Littman M. L.(2000). Approximate dimension equalization in vector‐based information retrieval.Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning 423–430.
  64. Jiang F. &Littman M. L.(2001). Approximate dimension reduction at NTCIR. Proceedings of the Second NTCIR Workshop on Research in Chinese and Japanese Text Retrieval and Text Summarization. Retrieved January 3 2003 fromhttp://research.nii.ac.jp/ntcir/workshop/OnlineProceedings2/michael.pdf
  65. Karypis G. &Han E.‐H.(2000). Fast supervised dimensionality reduction algorithm with applications to document categorization and retrieval.Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management 12–19. · doi:10.1145/354756.354772
  66. Kleinberg J.(1998). Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment.Proceedings of the ACM‐SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms 668–677.
  67. 10.1145/1095366.1095368 · doi:10.1145/1095366.1095368
  68. Kurimo M.(2000). Fast Latent Semantic Indexing of spoken documents by using self‐organizing maps.Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing ICASSP'2000 2425–2428. · doi:10.1109/icassp.2000.859331
  69. Lancaster F. W., 1986, Vocabulary control for information retrieval
  70. Landauer T. K.(2002). Applications of latent semantic analysis.Proceedings of 24th Annual Cognitive Science Conference 44. · doi:10.4324/9781315782379-34
  71. Landauer T. K., 1996, Memory in context, 105
  72. 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Landauer T. K. Laham D. Rehder B. &Schreiner M. E.(1997). How well can passage meaning be derived without using word order? A comparison of latent semantic analysis and humans.Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 412–417.
  74. Landauer T. K. &Littman M. L.(1990). Fully automatic cross‐language document retrieval using latent semantic indexing.Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Conference of the UW Centre for the New Oxford English Dictionary and Text Research 31–38.
  75. Larkey L. S.(1998) Automatic essay grading using text categorization techniques.Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 90–95. · DOI · Paper page
  76. Lemaire B., 2001, La cognition entre individu et société, 309
  77. Littman M. L., 1998, A comparison of two corpus‐based methods for translingual information retrieval
  78. Littman M. L. Jiang F. &Keim G. A.(1998).Learning a language‐independent representation for terms from a partially aligned corpus.Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning 314–322.
  79. 10.1016/0306-4573(89)90100-3 · DOI
  80. 10.3758/BF03204766 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.1108/eb024031 · doi:10.1108/eb024031
  82. 10.1145/321033.321035 · DOI · Paper page
  83. Miller M. H.(1997). Representing search results in three dimensions with local latent semantic indexing.Proceedings of the 20th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 338–339.
  84. Mori T. Kokubu T. &Tanaka T.(2001). Cross‐lingual information retrieval based on LSI with multiple word spaces. Proceedings of the Second NTCIR Workshop on Research in Chinese and Japanese Text Retrieval and Text Summarization. Retrieved January 21 2003 fromhttp://research.nii.ac.jp/ntcir/workshop/OnlineProceedings2/mori‐ir.pdf
  85. Nielsen J., 1992, Retrieving imperfectly recognized handwritten notes
  86. 10.1007/978-1-4615-5661-9_12 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5661-9_12
  87. O'Brien G.(1994). Information management tools for updating an SVD‐encoded indexing scheme. Unpublished master's thesis University of Tennessee.
  88. Orengo V. M. &Huyck C.(2002 September). Portuguese‐English experiments using latent semantic indexing. Proceeding of the CLEF 2002 Workshop. Retrieved January 9 2003 fromclef.iei.pi.cnr.it:2002/workshop2002/WN/9.pdf
  89. 10.1207/s15327906mbr0104_6 · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0104_6
  90. 10.1080/00220973.1994.9943835 · DOI · Paper page
  91. Papadimitriou C. H. Raghavan P. Tamaki H. &Vempala S.(1995).Latent semantic indexing: A probabilistic analysis. 17th Annual Symposium on Principles of Database Systems 159–169. · DOI · Paper page
  92. Posse C. &Perisic I.(2001). Latent semantic pursuit.Proceedings of the 1st SIAM International Conference on Data Mining Textmine Workshop 31–38.
  93. 10.1207/s15516709cog2701_2 · DOI
  94. Rehder B. Littman M. L. Dumais S. T. &Landauer T. K.(1997). Automatic 3‐language cross‐language information retrieval with latent semantic indexing.NIST Special Publication 500–240: The Sixth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC‐6) 233–240. · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.500-240.clir-duke
  95. Richardson M. &Domingos P.(2002).The intelligent surfer: Probabilistic combination of link and content information in PageRank.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS*14) 1441–1448.
  96. Robertson S. E., 2001, NIST Special Publication 500–250: The Tenth Text REtrieval Conference, 26
  97. Salton G., 1968, Automatic information organization and retrieval
  98. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199006)41:4<288::AID-ASI8>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI · Paper page
  99. Salton G. Buckley C. &Yu C.(1982). An evaluation of term dependence models in information retrieval.Proceedings of the 5th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 151–173. · doi:10.1007/bfb0036345
  100. Salton G., 1983, Introduction to modern information retrieval
  101. Schütze H.(1992). Dimensions of meaning. InProceedings of Supercomputing '92 787–796. · DOI
  102. Schütze H., 1998, Automatic word sense disambiguation, Computational Linguistics, 24, 97
  103. Schütze H. Hull D. A. &Pedersen J.(1995). A comparison of classifiers and document representation for the routing problem.Proceedings of the 18th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 229–237. · DOI · Paper page
  104. Schütze H. &Silverstein C.(1997). A comparison of projections for efficient document clustering.Proceedings of the 20th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 74–81. · doi:10.1145/258525.258539
  105. Sheridan P. &Ballerini J. P.(1996). Experiments in multilingual information retrieval using the SPIDER system.Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 58–65. · DOI · Paper page
  106. Soboroff I. M. Nicholas C. K. Kukla J. M. &Ebert D. S.(1997). Visualizing document authorship using n‐grams and latent semantic analysis.Workshop on New Paradigms in Information Visualization and Manipulation 1997 43–48. · doi:10.1145/275519.275529
  107. 10.1002/aris.1440360106 · DOI
  108. Sparck Jones K., 1971, Automatic keyword classification in information retrieval
  109. 10.1108/eb026526 · DOI · Paper page
  110. Srinivasan P., 1992, Information retrieval: Data structures and algorithms, 161
  111. 10.1016/0306-4573(96)00025-8 · DOI
  112. 10.1016/0306-4573(95)00055-0 · doi:10.1016/0306-4573(95)00055-0
  113. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198609)37:5<331::AID-ASI8>3.0.CO;2-E · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(198609)37:5<331::aid-asi8>3.0.co;2-e
  114. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198909)40:5<356::AID-ASI9>3.0.CO;2-B · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(198909)40:5<356::aid-asi9>3.0.co;2-b
  115. 10.1002/asi.1135 · DOI
  116. Tarr D. &Borko H.(1974). Factors influencing inter‐indexer consistency.Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science 50–55.
  117. 10.3758/BF03197039 · DOI · Paper page
  118. Trybula W., 2000, Text mining, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 385
  119. 10.1080/09528130110100270 · DOI
  120. Turney P. D.(2001b).Mining the Web for synonyms: PMI‐IR versus LSA on TOEFL. Proceedings of the Twelfth European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML2001) 491–502. · DOI · Paper page
  121. Van Dijk T. A., 1983, Strategies of discourse comprehension
  122. Van Rijsbergen C. J., 1979, Information retrieval
  123. Vinokourov A. Shawe‐Taylor J. &Cristianini N.(2002). Inferring a semantic representation of text via cross‐language correlation analysis. Neural Information Processing SystemsNIPS 2002. Retrieved April 9 2003 fromhttp://www.cs.cmu.edu/Groups/NIPS/NIPS2002/NIPS2002preproceedings/papers/AP10.html
  124. 10.1093/comjnl/41.8.589 · doi:10.1093/comjnl/41.8.589
  125. Wolf P. &Raj B.(2002). The MERL SpokenQuery information retrieval system: A system for retrieving pertinent documents from a spoken query.IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME 2002) 317–320 · doi:10.1109/icme.2002.1035591
  126. 10.1145/22952.22957 · DOI
  127. Xu J. &Croft W. B.(1996). Query expansion using local and global document analysis.Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 4–11. · DOI · Paper page
  128. Zelikovitz S. &Hirsh H.(2001). Using LSI for text classification in the presence of background text.Proceedings of the Conference on Information and Knowledge Management CIKM'01 113–118. · DOI
  129. 10.1137/S1064827597329266 · doi:10.1137/s1064827597329266

Cited by

See all 1,107

Metadata

Authors
Dumais, S. T.
Venue
Annual Review of Information Science and Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-01
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
188-230
ISSN
  • 0066-4200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-8382
DOI
10.1002/aris.1440380105
OpenAlex
W2152311353
Cited by
1,107
References
5
FWCI
7.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 630 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Latent semantic analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aris.1440380105
The paper
Dumais, S. T. (2004). Latent semantic analysis. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440380105

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.