Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 579

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of adjuvant methotrexate treatment for giant cell arteritis

Hoffman, Gary S., Cid, Maria C., Hellmann, David B., Guillevin, Loic, Stone, John H., Schousboe, John, Cohen, Pascal, Calabrese, Leonard H., Dickler, Howard, Merkel, Peter A., Fortin, Paul, Flynn, John A., Locker, Geri A., Easley, Kirk A., Schned, Eric, Hunder, Gene G., Sneller, Michael C., Tuggle, Carol, Swanson, Howard, Hernández‐Rodríguez, J., Lopez‐Soto, Alfons, Bork, Debora, Hoffman, Diane B., Kalunian, Kenneth, Klashman, David, Wilke, William S., Scheetz, Raymond J., Mandell, Brian F., Fessler, Barri J., Kosmorsky, Gregory, Prayson, Richard, Luqmani, Raashid A., Nuki, George, McRorie, Euan, Sherrer, Yvonne, Baca, Shawn, Walsh, Bridgit, Ferland, Diane, Soubrier, Martin, Choi, Hyon K., Gross, Wolfgang, Segal, Allen M., Ludivico, Charles, Puechal, Xavier, International Network for the Study of Systematic Vasculitides (INSSYS)·2002·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate treatment with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with newly diagnosed giant cell arteritis (GCA) to determine if MTX reduces GCA relapses and cumulative corticosteroid (CS) requirements and diminishes disease‐ and treatment‐related morbidity. Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, double‐blind study. Over 4 years, 16 centers from the International Network for the Study of Systemic Vasculitides enrolled patients with unequivocal GCA. The initial treatment was 1 mg/kg/day (≤60 mg every day) prednisone, plus either 0.15 mg/kg/week MTX (increased to 0.25 mg/kg/week, for a maximum weekly dosage of 15 mg) or placebo. Two physicians, both blinded to treatment allocation, evaluated each patient at every trial visit. One physician was responsible for providing global medical care. The other assessed GCA status according to a standard protocol. Treatment failure was defined as 2 distinct relapses or persistence of disease activity after the first relapse, in spite of increased CS therapy. Results: Ninety‐eight patients were enrolled. No significant differences between treatment groups were noted with regard to age, frequency of positive findings on temporal artery biopsy (placebo 87%, MTX 79%), or comorbidities at the time of enrollment. The median dosage of MTX was 15 mg/week. The incidence of treatment failure was comparable between groups after 12 months: 57.5% in the MTX group failed treatment (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 41.6–73.4%) compared with 77.3% in the placebo group (95% CI 61.9–92.8%) (P = 0.26). In a Cox regression analysis, MTX was not associated with a reduced risk of treatment failure (relative risk 0.72; 95% CI 0.41–1.28). There were no significant differences between groups with regard to abnormal elevations of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate following initial remissions, serious morbidity due to GCA, cumulative CS dose, or treatment toxicity. In the MTX group, there were fewer cases of GCA relapse heralded by symptoms of isolated polymyalgia rheumatica (1 case versus 5 in the placebo group; P = 0.05). Conclusion: The results of this randomized, multicenter trial do not support the adjunctive use of MTX to control disease activity or to decrease the cumulative dose and toxicity of CS in patients with GCA.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.10262

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 579

Metadata

Authors
Hoffman, G. S., Cid, M. C., Hellmann, D. B., Guillevin, L., Stone, J. H., Schousboe, J., Cohen, P., Calabrese, L. H., Dickler, H., Merkel, P. A., Fortin, P., Flynn, J. A., Locker, G. A., Easley, K. A., Schned, E., Hunder, G. G., Sneller, M. C., Tuggle, C., Swanson, H., Hernández‐Rodríguez, J., Lopez‐Soto, A., Bork, D., Hoffman, D. B., Kalunian, K., Klashman, D., Wilke, W. S., Scheetz, R. J., Mandell, B. F., Fessler, B. J., Kosmorsky, G., Prayson, R., Luqmani, R. A., Nuki, G., McRorie, E., Sherrer, Y., Baca, S., Walsh, B., Ferland, D., Soubrier, M., Choi, H. K., Gross, W., Segal, A. M., Ludivico, C., Puechal, X., & International Network for the Study of Systematic Vasculitides (INSSYS)
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-05
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
1309-1318
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2056768892
Cited by
579
References
25
FWCI
13.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of adjuvant methotrexate treatment for giant cell arteritis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/art.10262
The paper
Hoffman, G. S., Cid, M. C., Hellmann, D. B., Guillevin, L., Stone, J. H., Schousboe, J., Cohen, P., Calabrese, L. H., Dickler, H., Merkel, P. A., Fortin, P., Flynn, J. A., Locker, G. A., Easley, K. A., Schned, E., Hunder, G. G., Sneller, M. C., Tuggle, C., Swanson, H., . . . International Network for the Study of Systematic Vasculitides (INSSYS). (2002). A multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of adjuvant methotrexate treatment for giant cell arteritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.10262

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.