Cited by 24Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth and Well-being Studies

Other measures of psychological well-being: the Affect Balance Scale (ABS), General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12), Life Satisfaction Index-A (LSI-A), Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), and State-Trait Anxiety Index (STAI)

Schiaffino, Kathleen M.·2003·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.11408

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Schiaffino, K. M.
Affiliations
Fordham University (US)
Corresponding author
Schiaffino, Kathleen M.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-10-15
Volume
49
Issue
S5
Pages
S165-S174
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2091618379
Cited by
24
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Arthritis & Rheumatism (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
psychological well-being, General Health Questionnaire, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Satisfaction with Life Scale, arthritis, psychometric measures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review