Cited by 240Physical Activity and HealthMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Objective physical activity measurement in the osteoarthritis initiative: Are guidelines being met?

Open access
Dunlop, Dorothy D., Song, Jing, Semanik, Pamela A., Chang, Rowland W., Sharma, Leena, Bathon, Joan M., Eaton, Charles B., Hochberg, Marc C. +5 more·2011·Arthritis & Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective: Osteoarthritis (OA) clinical practice guidelines identify a substantial therapeutic role for physical activity, but objective information about the physical activity of this population is lacking. The aim of this study was to objectively measure levels of physical activity in adults with knee OA and report the prevalence of meeting public health physical activity guidelines. Methods: Cross‐sectional accelerometry data from 1,111 adults with radiographic knee OA (49–84 years old) participating in the Osteoarthritis Initiative accelerometry monitoring ancillary study were assessed for meeting the aerobic component of the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (≥150 minutes/week moderate‐to‐vigorous–intensity activity lasting ≥10 minutes). Quantile regression was used to test median sex differences in physical activity levels. Results: Aerobic physical activity guidelines were met by 12.9% of men and 7.7% of women with knee OA. A substantial proportion of men and women (40.1% and 56.5%, respectively) were inactive, having done no moderate‐to‐vigorous activity that lasted 10 minutes or more during the 7 days. Although men engaged in significantly more moderate‐to‐vigorous activity (average daily minutes 20.7 versus 12.3), they also spent more time in no or very‐low‐intensity activity than women (average daily minutes 608.2 versus 585.8). Conclusion: Despite substantial health benefits from physical activity, adults with knee OA were particularly inactive based on objective accelerometry monitoring. The proportions of men and women who met public health physical activity guidelines were substantially less than those previously reported based on self‐reported activity in arthritis populations. These findings support intensified public health efforts to increase physical activity levels among people with knee OA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.30562

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [7]American College of Rheumatology Subcommittee on Osteoarthritis Guidelines Recommendations for the medical management of osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: 2000 update Arthritis Rheum 2000 Sep 43 9 1905 1915 11014340
  2. [8]Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report 2008 Washington, DC U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 19178654

Cited by

Authors
Dunlop, D. D., Song, J., Semanik, P. A., Chang, R. W., Sharma, L., Bathon, J. M., Eaton, C. B., Hochberg, M. C., Jackson, R. D., Kwoh, C. K., Mysiw, W. J., Nevitt, M. C., & Hootman, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-10-28
Volume
63
Issue
11
Pages
3372-3382
ISSN
  • 0004-3591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-0131
OpenAlex
W2169641763
Cited by
240
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
8.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Arthritis & Rheumatism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01ar22260-13-0-1, n01ar22258-16-0-1, n01ar22259-12-0-1, n01ar22262-12-0-1, n01ar22261-13-0-1)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (N01 ‐ AR ‐ 2 ‐ 2261, N01‐AR‐2‐2260, N01 AR022262, R01AR055287, N01 AR022260, R01AR054155, P60 AR 48098, N01 ‐ AR ‐ 2 ‐ 2258, N01 AR022261, N01-AR-2- 2262, N01 AR022259, N01 AR022258, R01AR048748, R21AR059412, N01AR22259, P60AR048098)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025741)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
knee osteoarthritis, physical activity, physical activity guidelines, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, accelerometry, physical inactivity, sex differences, Osteoarthritis Initiative, public health recommendations
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Knee Joint, Male, Middle Aged, Public Health, Radiography, Risk Factors, Exercise, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Disease Progression, Osteoarthritis, Knee

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review