Cited by 117Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchPeripheral Neuropathies and DisordersPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Evidence of Abnormal Epidermal Nerve Fiber Density in Fibromyalgia: Clinical and Immunologic Implications

Caro, Xavier J., Winter, Earl F.·2014·Arthritis & Rheumatology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A subset of patients with fibromyalgia (FM) exhibit a large fiber demyelinating peripheral polyneuropathy akin to that seen in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). It has been suggested that this demyelinating process is likely to be immune mediated. Because it is known that similar large fiber neuropathic lesions may be associated with a cutaneous small fiber neuropathy, we sought to determine the prevalence of small fiber neuropathy, as measured by epidermal nerve fiber density (ENFD), in a series of patients with FM and clinically healthy control subjects. METHODS: Forty-one consecutive patients with FM and 47 control subjects underwent a 3-mm punch skin biopsy at the proximal thigh and distal leg near the ankle, for analysis of the ENFD. Patients with FM who had clinical evidence of a disorder known to be associated with small fiber neuropathy were excluded. The patients with FM also underwent pinwheel testing and vibratory testing for hypesthesia and serologic testing for a series of cytokine, circulating immune complex, and complement measurements. RESULTS: All patients with FM had evidence of stocking hypesthesia. The ENFD of patients with FM was lower than that of control subjects at both the calf (mean ± SD 5.8 ± 2.8 versus 7.4 ± 1.9; P = 0.0002) and thigh (9.3 ± 3.2 versus 11.3 ± 2.0; P = 0.0007). There was an inverse correlation between calf ENFD and age at the time of skin biopsy in patients with FM (r = -0.29, P = 0.03) but not in…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.38662

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The exact impact of the peripheral nervous system on pain in fibromyalgia syndrome is still a matter of debate.

    “however, the exact impact of the peripheral nervous system on pain in FMS is still a matter of debate.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Caro, X. J., & Winter, E. F.
Affiliations
  • Northridge Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • North Central University Prescott Arizona
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-06-27
Volume
66
Issue
7
Pages
1945-1954
ISSN
  • 2326-5191 (ISSN-L)
  • 2326-5205
OpenAlex
W1824537281
Cited by
117
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12
FWCI
10.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Arthritis & Rheumatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
fibromyalgia, epidermal nerve fiber density, small fiber neuropathy, demyelinating peripheral neuropathy, interleukin-2 receptor, autoimmune neuropathy, skin biopsy, cytokines, circulating immune complexes, complement system, neuropathic pain, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Biopsy, Epidermis, Erythromelalgia, Female, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Hypesthesia, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Fibers, Receptors, Interleukin-2, Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review