Cited by 54Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchReproductive System and PregnancyPregnancy and preeclampsia studies

Brief report: changes in antiphospholipid antibody titers during pregnancy: effects on pregnancy outcomes

Open access
Yelnik, Cecile M., Porter, T. Flint, Branch, D. Ware, Laskin, Carl A., Merrill, Joan T., Guerra, Marta M., Lockshin, Michael D., Buyon, Jill P. +5 more·2016·Arthritis & Rheumatology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure variance in antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) levels during pregnancy and to determine if variation affects pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: We used data from the PROMISSE (Predictors of Pregnancy Outcome: Biomarkers in Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus) study, a multicenter prospective study of pregnant women with aPL and/or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Antiphospholipid antibodies were considered present if any of the following were positive: anticardiolipin (aCL), anti-β2 -glycoprotein I (anti-β2 GPI) titers ≥40 IgG phospholipid (GPL) or IgM phospholipid (MPL) units, and/or lupus anticoagulant (LAC). Antiphospholipid antibodies were measured every trimester and postpartum. Adverse pregnancy outcomes were defined as fetal/neonatal death, preterm delivery (<36 weeks) due to preeclampsia or placental insufficiency, or growth restriction. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-two aPL-positive patients were studied. Fifty-seven percent had clinical antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and 36% had SLE. IgG aPL levels were significantly lower during the second and third trimesters compared to initial screening, but IgG aCL and anti-β2 GPI remained high-positive through pregnancy in 93% of patients during the second trimester, and in 85% of patients during the third trimester. IgM aPL titers were negative in the majority of patients and decreased modestly during pregnancy among patients who were positive. LAC frequency also decreased, but 75% of patients remained positive through the second trimester. Only 4% of patients with aPL at baseline did not have aPL in either the second or third trimesters. Changes in aPL levels or aPL status were not associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. LAC was the only aPL associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. CONCLUSION: The aPL in the cohort decreased marginally during pregnancy, and changes were not associated with pregnancy outcomes. Our results suggest that, among women with aPL and/or SLE, measuring aPL early in pregnancy is sufficient to assess risk. Repeat aPL testing through pregnancy is unnecessary.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.39668

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yelnik, C. M., Porter, T. F., Branch, D. W., Laskin, C. A., Merrill, J. T., Guerra, M. M., Lockshin, M. D., Buyon, J. P., Petri, M., Sammaritano, L. R., Stephenson, M. D., Kim, M. Y., & Salmon, J. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Lille Lille France
  • Intermountain Healthcare (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation (US)
  • Hospital for Special Surgery (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Salmon, Jane E.
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-07-27
Volume
68
Issue
8
Pages
1964-1969
ISSN
  • 2326-5191 (ISSN-L)
  • 2326-5205
OpenAlex
W2503936993
Cited by
54
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Arthritis & Rheumatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, NIH (AR-49772)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Keywords
antiphospholipid antibodies, pregnancy outcomes, antiphospholipid syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, anticardiolipin antibodies, anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies, lupus anticoagulant, antibody titers, adverse pregnancy outcomes, preterm birth, fetal death
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Prospective Studies, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Antibodies, Antiphospholipid, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review