Cited by 185Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders ResearchNatural Compounds in Disease Treatment

Secukinumab in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Phase III Randomized, Double‐Blind, Active Comparator– and Placebo‐Controlled Study

Blanco, Francisco J., Möricke, Rüdiger, Dokoupilova, Eva, Codding, Christine, Neal, Jeffrey, Andersson, Mats, Rohrer, Susanne, Richards, Hanno·2017·Arthritis & Rheumatology

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate response to or intolerance of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. Methods: In this phase III study, 551 patients were randomized (1:1:1:1) to receive intravenous secukinumab at a dose of 10 mg/kg (at baseline and weeks 2 and 4) followed by subcutaneous secukinumab at a dose of either 150 mg or 75 mg every 4 weeks or, alternatively, abatacept or placebo on the same dosing schedule. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving 20% improvement in disease activity according to the American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR20) at week 24 in the secukinumab 150 mg or 75 mg treatment groups as compared with placebo. Key secondary end points included change from baseline to week 24 in the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using C‐reactive protein level (DAS28‐CRP) and the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ DI), as well as the ACR 50% improvement (ACR50) response rate at week 24. Results: The primary efficacy end point was met in patients receiving 150 mg secukinumab, in whom the ACR20 response rate at week 24 was significantly higher than that in the placebo group. The ACR20 response rates at week 24 were 30.7% in patients receiving 150 mg secukinumab (P = 0.0305), 28.3% in those receiving 75 mg secukinumab (P = 0.0916), and 42.8% in those receiving abatacept, compared with 18.1% in the placebo group. A significant reduction in the DAS28‐CRP was seen in patients treated with 150 mg secukinumab (P = 0.0495), but not in patients treated with 75 mg secukinumab. Improvements in the HAQ DI and ACR50 response rates were not significant in the 2 secukinumab dose groups compared with the placebo group. The overall safety profile was similar across all treatment groups. Conclusion: Secukinumab at a dose of 150 mg resulted in improvement in signs and symptoms and reduced disease activity in patients with active RA who had an inadequate response to TNF inhibitors. Improvements observed with abatacept were numerically higher than with secukinumab. There were no new or unexpected safety signals with secukinumab in this study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/art.40070

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In experimental models of psoriasis, Th17 cells are considered the main pathogenic T cell population driving disease.

    “In experimental models of psoriasis, Th17 cells are thought to be the main pathogenic T cell population driving disease.”

    From TH17 cell heterogeneity and its role in tissue inflammation (2023) · cites this paper as [118]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blanco, F. J., Möricke, R., Dokoupilova, E., Codding, C., Neal, J., Andersson, M., Rohrer, S., & Richards, H.
Affiliations
  • Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña (ES)
  • Institut für Präventive Medizin & Klinische Forschung Magdeburg Germany
  • Medical Plus Uherske Hradiste Czech Republic
  • Health Research of Oklahoma Oklahoma City
  • Bluegrass Community Research Lexington Kentucky
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
Venue
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-05-03
Volume
69
Issue
6
Pages
1144-1153
ISSN
  • 2326-5191 (ISSN-L)
  • 2326-5205
OpenAlex
W2589882987
Cited by
185
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12
FWCI
20.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Arthritis & Rheumatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Natural Compounds in Disease Treatment
Keywords
secukinumab, rheumatoid arthritis, TNF-alpha inhibitors, abatacept, IL-17A inhibition, disease activity, ACR20 response, DAS28-CRP, subcutaneous dosing, drug safety, adverse events, treatment discontinuation, dose comparison
MeSH terms
Adult, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, C-Reactive Protein, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Injections, Subcutaneous, Male, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Antirheumatic Agents, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Administration, Intravenous

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review