Cited by 150Innovative Teaching MethodsInnovative Teaching Methodologies in Social SciencesInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Learning through discussions: comparing the benefits of small-group and large-class settings

Pollock, Philip H., Hamann, Kerstin, Wilson, Bruce M.·2011·Journal of Political Science Education

Abstract

The literature on teaching and learning heralds the benefits of discussion for student learner outcomes, especially its ability to improve students' critical thinking skills. Yet, few studies compare the effects of different types of face-to-face discussions on learners. Using student surveys, we analyze the benefits of small-group and large-class discussions in an upper-level political theory course. We also analyze whether the same types of students are likely to participate and reap the benefits of both types of discussions. We find that, overall, participation is higher in small-group discussions, as are students' perceptions of learner outcomes. We also find a more equal participation of students of different ethnic backgrounds in small-group discussions; similarly, previous academic achievements have less influence on discussion participation in small groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15512169.2011.539913

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pollock, P. H., Hamann, K., & Wilson, B. M.
Affiliations
University of Central Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Hamann, Kerstin
Venue
Journal of Political Science Education
Published
2011-02-08
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
48-64
ISSN
  • 1551-2169 (ISSN-L)
  • 1551-2177
OpenAlex
W1983864715
Cited by
146
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
32.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Political Science Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
classroom discussion, small group discussion, student participation, critical thinking, political theory courses, ethnicity, prior academic achievement, student perceptions of learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review