Cited by 42Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityKnowledge Management and SharingComplex Network Analysis Techniques

Online supportive interactions: Using a network approach to examine communication patterns within a psychosis social support group in Taiwan

Chang, Hui‐Jung·2009·Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Abstract

A network approach was used to determine the overall supportive communication patterns constructed within the PTT psychosis support group in Taiwan, the largest bulletin board system in the Chinese‐speaking world. The full sequences of supportive interactions were observed over a $2{\textstyle{1 \over 2}}$‐year period from February 2004 to July 2006. The results indicated that the most exchanged support types were information and network links. All types of supportive communication networks were relatively sparse, yet small groups of cliques with different provision of support types formed within the psychosis group. Most of the online supportive interactions exchanged at dyadic and triadic levels. The overall supportive network was highly centralized. The overall findings with implications for future studies were discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/asi.21070

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an online psychosis peer-support group, different forms of support emerged: informational support about medication use or contacting mental health providers, esteem support involving positive comments for encouragement, network support for sharing similar experiences, and emotional support to express understanding and offer hope or confidence.

    “Specifically, different forms of support emerged, including ‘informational support’ about medication use or contacting mental health providers, ‘esteem support’ involving positive comments for encouragement, ‘network support’ for sharing similar experiences, and ‘emotional support’ to express understanding of a peer’s situation and offer hope or confidence (Chang, 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chang, H.
Affiliations
Fu Jen Catholic University (TW)
Corresponding author
Chang, Hui‐Jung
Venue
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-04-13
Volume
60
Issue
7
Pages
1504-1517
ISSN
  • 1532-2882 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2890
OpenAlex
W4248364519
Cited by
42
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
bulletin boards, social support, communication patterns, network analysis, cliques, network centrality, information sharing, online communities, Taiwan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review