Cited by 27Algal biology and biofuel productionBioenergy crop production and managementAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Development of cost models of algae production in a cold climate using different production systems

Pankratz, Stan, Oyedun, Adetoyese O., Kumar, Amit·2019·Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining

Abstract

Abstract Research into the potential use of microalgae to produce biofuels is receiving significant attention. In the cold climates of countries like Canada, algae cultivation in open raceway pond (ORP) systems is limited to a short period of the year when pond surface water temperatures and ambient light conditions enable optimal culture growth. In this study we develop techno‐economic assessment models to predict, evaluate, and compare the techno‐economic results from three autotrophic algae cultivation scenarios to produce algae biomass. The first is a modeled ORP site located in the southern USA, which has a minimum biomass selling price (MBSP) for algae of $541 tonne−1 (T−1). The second scenario models an identical ORP system co‐located at a site near Fort Saskatchewan, a northern city in the province of Alberta, Canada. The resulting MBSP is $1288 T−1. A third scenario models a photobioreactor (PBR) cultivation system co‐located at the same northern Alberta site and shows algae production with an MBSP of $550 T−1. Each system is scaled to produce 2000 T day−1 ash‐free dry weight (AFDE) algae biomass. The study concludes that PBR systems deployed at this scale have the potential to reduce production costs significantly ($ T−1) compared to similarly sited ORP systems in Canada, despite climatic factors and high initial capital costs associated with PBR construction. Furthermore, the modeled PBR system required 0.3% of the water required by the ORP cultivation platforms (153 × 103 versus 59 527 × 103 m3) and 0.04% of the land (32 versus. 82 038 ha). © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bbb.2015

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Over five years, it is possible to triple the size of PBR and increase average biomass productivity from 5 to 8 g/L/day.

    “Pankratz et al. [36] consider that, over five years, it is possible to triple the size of PBR and increase the average biomass productivity from 5 to 8 gL -1 day -1 .”

    From The Perspective of Large-Scale Production of Algae Biodiesel (2020) · cites this paper as [36]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pankratz, S., Oyedun, A. O., & Kumar, A.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Kumar, Amit
Venue
Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-05-02
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
1246-1260
ISSN
  • 1932-1031 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-104X
OpenAlex
W2942647569
Cited by
27
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Alberta Innovates
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
microalgae cultivation, techno-economic analysis, photobioreactors, raceway ponds, cold climate, Alberta, biofuel feedstock, capital costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review