Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 362

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Techno‐economic analysis of a lignocellulosic ethanol biorefinery with ionic liquid pre‐treatment

Klein‐Marcuschamer, Daniel, Simmons, Blake A., Blanch, Harvey W.·2011·Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
DOI 10.1002/bbb.303
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Lignocellulose dissolution in ionic liquids is a relatively new biomass pre‐treatment technology that is receiving growing interest from the biofuels community as a route to provide readily‐hydrolyzable holocellulose. Despite its proven advantages over other pre‐treatment technologies – including feedstock invariance, high monomeric sugar yields over short saccharification times, and extensive delignification – there are several core issues that stand in the way of commercialization. These include the relative high cost of the ionic liquids themselves, a lack of knowledge in terms of process considerations for a biorefinery based on these solvents, and scant information on the coproducts this pre‐treatment technology could provide to the marketplace. We present an initial techno‐economic model of a biorefinery that is based on the ionic liquid pre‐treatment technology and have identified, through a comprehensive sensitivity analysis, the most significant areas in terms of cost savings/revenue generation that must be addressed before ionic liquid pre‐treatment can compete with other, more established, pre‐treatment technologies. This report evaluates this new pre‐treatment technology through the perspective of a virtual operating biorefinery, and although there are significant challenges that must be addressed, there is a clear path that can enable commercialization of this novel approach. © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bbb.303

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 10.1186/gb-2008-9-12-242 · DOI · Paper page
  2. AdenA RuthM IbsenK JechuraJ NeevesK SheehanJet al. Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co‐Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Corn Stover. NREL (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1002/9780470959138.ch14 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/btpr.83 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s00253-009-1883-1 · DOI · Paper page
  6. LarssonS PalmqvistE Hahn‐HägerdalB TengborgC StenbergK ZacchiGet al. The generation of fermentation inhibitors during dilute acid hydrolysis of softwood. Enzyme Microb Tech 24(3–4):151–159 (1999). · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.12.047 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1007/BF02920119 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/0960-8524(95)00042-D · DOI
  10. 10.1002/btpr.160 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.01.017 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1021/ja025790m · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.066 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1002/bit.22179 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1021/bm700679s · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1002/bit.22386 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.040 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1007/s10086-009-1020-x · DOI
  19. Çetinkol OP, 2009, Understanding the Impact of Ionic Liquid Pre‐Treatment on Eucalyptus.
  20. 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.07.033 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1002/bit.22381 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1039/b419172b · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1039/b815310h · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Klein‐Marcuschamer, D., Simmons, B. A., & Blanch, H. W.
Venue
Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06-16
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
562-569
ISSN
  • 1932-1031 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-104X
DOI
10.1002/bbb.303
OpenAlex
W2172068430
Cited by
362
References
1
FWCI
11.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.