Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Corn Stover
Open accessAbstract
This report is an update of NREL's ongoing process design and economic analyses of processes related to developing ethanol from lignocellulosic feedstocks. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is promoting the development of ethanol from lignocellulosic feedstocks as an alternative to conventional petroleum-based transportation fuels. DOE funds both fundamental and applied research in this area and needs a method for predicting cost benefits of many research proposals. To that end, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) has modeled many potential process designs and estimated the economics of each process during the last 20 years. This report is an update of the ongoing process design and economic analyses at NREL. We envision updating this process design report at regular intervals; the purpose being to ensure that the process design incorporates all new data from NREL research, DOE funded research and other sources, and that the equipment costs are reasonable and consistent with good engineering practice for plants of this type. For the non-research areas this means using equipment and process approaches as they are currently used in industrial applications. For the last report, published in 1999, NREL performed a complete review and update of the process design and economic model for the biomass-to-ethanol process utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis with simultaneous saccharification (enzymatic) and co-fermentation. The process design included the core technologies being researched by the DOE: prehydrolysis, simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation, and cellulase enzyme production. In addition, all ancillary areas--feed handling, product recovery and purification, wastewater treatment (WWT), lignin combustor and boiler-turbogenerator, and utilities--were included. NREL engaged Delta-T Corporation (Delta-T) to assist in the process design evaluation, the process equipment costing, and overall plant integration. The process design and costing for the lignin combustor and boiler turbogenerator was reviewed by Reaction Engineering Inc. (REI) and Merrick & Company reviewed the wastewater treatment. Since then, NREL has engaged Harris Group (Harris) to perform vendor testing, process design, and costing of critical equipment identified during earlier work. This included solid/liquid separation and pretreatment reactor design and costing. Corn stover handling was also investigated to support DOE's decision to focus on corn stover as a feedstock for lignocellulosic ethanol. Working with Harris, process design and costing for these areas were improved through vendor designs, costing, and vendor testing in some cases. In addition to this work, enzyme costs were adjusted to reflect collaborative work between NREL and enzyme manufacturers (Genencor International and Novozymes Biotech) to provide a delivered enzyme for lignocellulosic feedstocks. This report is the culmination of our work and represents an updated process design and cost basis for the process using a corn stover feedstock. The process design and economic model are useful for predicting the cost benefits of proposed research. Proposed research results can be translated into modifications of the process design, and the economic impact can be assessed. This allows DOE, NREL, and other researchers to set priorities on future research with an understanding of potential reductions to the ethanol production cost. To be economically viable, ethanol production costs must be below market values for ethanol. DOE has chosen a target ethanol selling price of $1.07 per gallon as a goal for 2010. The conceptual design and costs presented here are based on a 2010 plant start-up date. The key research targets required to achieve this design and the $1.07 value are discussed in the report.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The approach used is similar to that employed in previous conceptual process designs and associated design reports.
“The approach used is similar to that employed in previous conceptual process designs and associated design reports (Aden et al. 2002, Spath et al. 2005, Phillips et al. 2007).”
From Production of Gasoline and Diesel from Biomass via Fast Pyrolysis, Hydrotreating and Hydrocracking: A Design Case (2009) · cites this paper as Aden et al. 2002
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- ASPEN Plus TM , Release 10.2, Aspen Technology, Inc., Cambridge, MA, February 2000.
- Sheehan, J. et al. Is ethanol from corn stover a sustainable fuel? A Case Study in Cyber Farming. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO. In Press.
- Glassner, D., J. Hettenhaus, T. Schechinger, "Corn Stover Collection Project," in BioEnergy '98-Expanding Bioenergy Partnerships: Proceedings, Volume 2, Madison, WI, pp 1100-1110, 1998. http://www.afdc.doe.gov/pdfs/5149.pdf.
- Hayden, J.G., and J.P. O'Connell, "A Generalized Method for Predicting Second Virial Coefficients," IEC Process. Des. Dev., 14(3), 209, 1975.
- Aersten, F., and G. Street, Applied Chemical Process Design, Plenum Press, New York, 1978.
- Babcock & Wilcox, 1978, Steam: It's Generation and Use Thirty-ninth Edition. Babcock & Wilcox Company, New York, NY, p. 34/10-16.
- Phillippek, C. et al, 1997. "NO x Formation and Reduction During Combustion of Wet Sewage Sludge in the Circulating Fluidized Bed," 1997 Fluidized Bed Combustion vol. 2, ASME 1997.
- Peters, M.S. and K.D. Timmerhaus, Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 4th Edition, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 1991.
- Short, W., D.J. Packey, and T. Holt, "A Manual for the Economic Evaluation and Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Technologies," National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Report TP-462-5173, pp. 20-21, March 1995.
- Perry, R. H., and D. W. Green, Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook, 7th Edition, McGraw- Hill, New York, pp. 9-76, 1997.
- Gary, J. H., and G. E. Handwerk, Petroleum Refining, Technology and Economics, 3rd Edition, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1994.
- Ibsen, K. "Publish results of Bridge to Corn Ethanol Subcontracts," Internal Report, National Renewable Energy Laboratory P milestone, February 2001. 78 Reported as runs #1 and #2 in Schell, D.J., J. Farmer, M. Newman, and J.D. McMillan. "Dilute Sulfuric Acid Pretreatment of Corn Stover in a Pilot-Scale Reactor: Investigation of Yields, Kinetics, and Solids Enzymatic Digestibilities" presented at the Twenty-Fourth Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals (Gatlinburg, TN, April-May 2002) and submitted to the conference proceedings which will be published in the Spring 2003 edition of Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 79 Comments from ethanol producers to J. Ashworth at the Enzyme Sugar Platform gate review meeting held in 2002 suggest that $0.02/kWh is in the range for long term power purchase and sales contracts in key states (Nebraska, Kansas). $0.06/kWh is below the industrial rate of many East coast utilities currently, so it represents a reasonable high-end value.
- Douglas, Larry J. "Monte Carlo Simulation as a Research Management Tool." TAPPI Proceedings of the 1986 Research and Development Conference. pp. 65-71.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels
Hill, J., Nelson, E., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Tiffany, D. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0604600103 · Cited by 2,871 · see citing works
Catalytic conversion of biomass to biofuels
Alonso, D. M., Bond, J. Q., & Dumesic, J. A. (2010) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c004654j · Cited by 2,333 · see citing works
Humbird, D., Davis, R., Tao, L., Kinchin, C., Hsu, D., Aden, A., Schoen, P., Lukas, J., Olthof, B., Worley, M., et al. (2011) · doi:10.2172/1013269 · Cited by 1,641 · see citing works
Self-citationPretreatment: the key to unlocking low‐cost cellulosic ethanol
Yang, B., & Wyman, C. E. (2008) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.49 · Cited by 1,524 · see citing works
Techno-Economic Analysis of Autotrophic Microalgae for Fuel Production
Davis, R., Aden, A., & Pienkos, P. T. (2011) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.04.018 · Cited by 1,069 · see citing works
Self-citationFuel ethanol production: Process design trends and integration opportunities
Cardona, C. A., & Sánchez, Ó. J. (2007) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.002 · Cited by 1,032 · see citing works
A review of separation technologies in current and future biorefineries
Huang, H.-J., Ramaswamy, S., Tschirner, U. W., & Ramarao, B. V. (2008) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2007.12.011 · Cited by 846 · see citing works
Biotechnology—a sustainable alternative for chemical industry
Gavrilescu, M., & Chisti, Y. (2005) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2005.03.004 · Cited by 713 · see citing works
Stephenson, A. L., Kazamia, E., Dennis, J. S., Howe, C. J., Scott, S. A., & Smith, A. G. (2010) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef1003123 · Cited by 571 · see citing works
Energy and Environmental Aspects of Using Corn Stover for Fuel Ethanol
Sheehan, J., Aden, A., Paustian, K., Killian, K., Brenner, J., Walsh, M., & Nelson, R. (2003) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1162/108819803323059433 · Cited by 567 · see citing works
Self-citationCurrent challenges in commercially producing biofuels from lignocellulosic biomass
Balan, V. (2014) · ISRN Biotechnology · doi:10.1155/2014/463074 · Cited by 551 · see citing works
Techno-economic evaluation of bioethanol production from three different lignocellulosic materials
Sassner, P., Galbe, M., & Zacchi, G. (2008) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.10.014 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Cheng, Y., Jae, J., Shi, J., Fan, W., & Huber, G. W. (2012) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201107390 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
Commercializing lignocellulosic bioethanol: technology bottlenecks and possible remedies
Banerjee, S., Mudliar, S., Sen, R., Giri, B., Satpute, D., Chakrabarti, T., & Pandey, R. A. (2010) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.188 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Jones, S. B., Valkenburg, C., Walton, C. W., Elliott, D. C., Holladay, J. E., Stevens, D. J., Kinchin, C., & Czernik, S. (2009) · doi:10.2172/949907 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Spath, P., Aden, A., Eggeman, T., Ringer, M., Wallace, B., & Jechura, J. (2005) · doi:10.2172/15016221 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Self-citationComparative cost analysis of algal oil production for biofuels
Sun, A., Davis, R., Starbuck, M., Ben-Amotz, A., Pate, R., & Pienkos, P. T. (2011) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.06.020 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Atsonios, K., Kougioumtzis, M.-A., D. Panopoulos, K., & Kakaras, E. (2015) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.056 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Environmental life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic conversion to ethanol: A review
Borrion, A. L., McManus, M. C., & Hammond, G. P. (2012) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.016 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Life cycle assessment of gasoline and diesel produced via fast pyrolysis and hydroprocessing
Hsu, D. D. (2012) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.05.019 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
LCA of second generation bioethanol: A review and some issues to be resolved for good LCA practice
Wiloso, E. I., Heijungs, R., & de Snoo, G. R. (2012) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.035 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Biddy, M. J., Davis, R., Humbird, D., Tao, L., Dowe, N., Guarnieri, M. T., Linger, J. G., Karp, E. M., Salvachúa, D., Vardon, D. R., et al. (2016) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00243 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Clauser, N. M., Felissia, F. E., Area, M. C., & Vallejos, M. E. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110687 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
The contribution of enzymes and process chemicals to the life cycle of ethanol
MacLean, H. L., & Spatari, S. (2009) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/4/1/014001 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Davis, R., Kinchin, C., Markham, J., Tan, E., Laurens, L., Sexton, D., Knorr, D., Schoen, P., & Lukas, J. (2014) · doi:10.2172/1159351 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Self-citationAntibacterial and phytochemical analysis of Banana fruit peel
G., E., A. O, E., & J.E, I. (2014) · IOSR Journal of Pharmacy (IOSRPHR) · doi:10.9790/3013-0408018025 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
González-García, S., Iribarren, D., Susmozas, A., Dufour, J., & Murphy, R. J. (2012) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.02.022 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Staples, M. D., Malina, R., Olcay, H., Pearlson, M. N., Hileman, J. I., Boies, A., & Barrett, S. R. H. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee43655a · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Nitzsche, R., Budzinski, M., & Gröngröft, A. (2016) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.008 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Accounting for the water impacts of ethanol production
Fingerman, K. R., Torn, M. S., O’Hare, M. H., & Kammen, D. M. (2010) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014020 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Konda, N. V. S. N. M., Singh, S., Simmons, B. A., & Klein-Marcuschamer, D. (2015) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-015-9594-1 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Environmental profile of ethanol from poplar biomass as transport fuel in Southern Europe
González-García, S., Gasol, C. M., Gabarrell, X., Rieradevall, J., Moreira, M. T., & Feijoo, G. (2010) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2009.10.029 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
The environmental and economic sustainability of potential bioethanol from willow in the UK
Stephenson, A. L., Dupree, P., Scott, S. A., & Dennis, J. S. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.07.104 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
van Rijn, R., Nieves, I. U., Shanmugam, K. T., Ingram, L. O., & Vermerris, W. (2018) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-018-9906-3 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Ethanologens vs. acetogens: Environmental impacts of two ethanol fermentation pathways
Budsberg, E., Crawford, J., Gustafson, R., Bura, R., & Puettmann, M. (2015) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.08.019 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Budsberg, E., Rastogi, M., Puettmann, M. E., Caputo, J., Balogh, S., Volk, T. A., Gustafson, R., & Johnson, L. (2012) · Forest Products Journal · doi:10.13073/fpj-d-12-00022.1 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Benvenutti, L. M. M., Parish, E. S., Busch, I., Jager, H. I., Hawkins, T. R., & Masum, F. H. (2025) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.5c05846 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Aden, A., Ruth, M., Ibsen, K., Jechura, J., Neeves, K., Sheehan, J., Wallace, B., Montague, L., Slayton, A., & Lukas, J.
- Published
- 2002-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W1576129734
- Cited by
- 1,197
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 100 · 2013: 81 · 2012: 119
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.osti.gov
- Locations
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) (submittedVersion)
- Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- National Renewable Energy Laboratory
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Keywords
- cellulosic ethanol, corn stover, enzymatic hydrolysis, simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation, process design, process economics, solid-liquid separation, wastewater treatment, plant integration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
