Cited by 9Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsUterine Myomas and TreatmentsSexual function and dysfunction studies

Systematic review and meta‐analysis of the pelvic organ prolapse and vaginal prolapse among the global population

Open access
Mudalige, Tharanga, Pathiraja, Vindya, Delanerolle, Gayathri, Cavalini, Heitor, Wu, Shuqi, Taylor, Julie, Kurmi, Om, Elliot, Kathryn +21 more·2025·BJUI Compass

Abstract

Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) occurs when one or more pelvic organs (uterus, bowel, bladder or top of the vagina) descend from their normal position and bulge into the vagina. Symptoms include pelvic discomfort, fullness, and changes in bladder or bowel function. Treatment ranges from conservative approaches to surgery, depending on symptom severity. Surgical methods include vaginal wall repair, with or without hysterectomy, or via laparoscopic, robotic or open techniques. Common complications include bleeding, infection, and urinary or bowel dysfunction. Methods: A systematic review was conducted, and a protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022346051). Publications from 30 April 1980 to 30 April 2023 were retrieved from multiple databases. Data were analysed using random‐effects and common‐effects models with subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Findings: Forty‐four studies met the inclusion criteria, with 29 studies used for meta‐analysis of vaginal prolapse surgery outcomes. Sixteen studies focused on patients who had undergone hysterectomy alongside prolapse repair. Interpretation: Patients who underwent vaginal prolapse surgery with hysterectomy experienced higher operative and postoperative complication rates than those without hysterectomy. Increased risks included hospital readmission, POP recurrence and re‐operation. The review highlighted a lack of diversity in terms of ethnicity, age and comorbidity status, which are essential to fully understanding the impact of POP. Future research should focus on these underrepresented factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bco2.464

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Obesity, which is related to morbidity, appears to be mitigated by both prehabilitation and the implementation of evidence informed early recovery after surgery programmes.

    “Obesity, which is related to morbidity, appears to be mitigated by both prehabilitation and the implementation of evidence informed early recovery after surgery programmes [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13].”

    From How Can We Improve the Assessment and Indifferent Outcomes From Pelvic Organ Prolapse Management From Conservative and Surgical Therapies? ICI‐RS 2025 (2026) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Discussion considers surgical complications and mentions women with high BMI, but it does not link obesity to morbidity or assess whether prehabilitation or early recovery programmes mitigate it. Searches for prehabilitation and early recovery after surgery returned no passage addressing those interventions. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]Ramesh B, Rani I, Rao KR. Uterovaginal Prolapse. In: Operations in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Text and Atlas. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd; 2020; 134– 156. 10.5005/jp/books/18568 · DOI
  2. [21]Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review. First Do No Harm: The report of the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review. Department of Health and Social Care. 2020. ISBN 978‐1‐5272‐6567‐7. 34994662

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mudalige, T., Pathiraja, V., Delanerolle, G., Cavalini, H., Wu, S., Taylor, J., Kurmi, O., Elliot, K., Hinchliff, S., Atkinson, C., Potocnik, K., Briggs, P., Saraswat, L., Kemp, H. F., Eleje, G., Hock, T. T., Benetti‐Pinto, C. L., Muhammad, I., Kareem, R., Bouchareb, Y., Phiri, P., Zhang, R., Weng, Y., Aggarwal, I., Shi, J. Q., Shetty, A., Litchfield, I., Rathnayake, N., & Elneil, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Ruhuna (LK)
  • Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Coventry University (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh Edinburgh Scotland UK
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • No affiliation
  • Nnamdi Azikiwe University (NG)
  • Sibu Hospital Sibu Sarawak Malaysia
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
  • Riphah International University (PK)
  • Sultan Qaboos University (OM)
  • KK Women's and Children's Hospital (SG)
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Elneil, Sohier
Venue
BJUI Compass
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-12-10
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
e464-e464
ISSN
2688-4526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405260240
Cited by
9
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJUI Compass (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
pelvic organ prolapse, vaginal prolapse, vaginal prolapse surgery, hysterectomy, postoperative complications, surgical complications, hospital readmission, prolapse recurrence, reoperation, pelvic floor surgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review