The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimized bone regeneration based on sustained release from three‐dimensional fibrous PLGA/HAp composite scaffolds loaded with BMP‐2
Abstract
Contemporary treatment of critical bone defect remains a significant challenge in the field of orthopedic surgery. Engineered biomaterials combined with growth factors have emerged as a new treatment alternative in bone repair and regeneration. Our approach is to encapsulate bone morphogenetic protein‐2 (BMP‐2) into a polymeric matrix in different ways and characterize their individual performance in a nude mouse model. The main objective of this study is to examine whether the PLGA/HAp composite fibrous scaffolds loaded with BMP‐2 through electrospinning can improve bone regeneration. The hypothesis is that different loading methods of BMP‐2 and different HAp contents in scaffolds can alternate the release profiles of BMP‐2 in vivo, therefore modify the performance of scaffolds in bone regeneration. Firstly, mechanical strength of scaffolds and HAp nanoparticles distribution in scaffolds were investigated. Secondly, nude mice experiments extended to 6 weeks were carried out to test the in vivo performance of these scaffolds, in which measurements, like serum BMP‐2 concentration, ALP activity, X‐ray qualification, and H&E/IHC tissue staining were utilized to monitor the growth of new bone and the changes of the corresponding biochemical parameters. The results showed that the PLGA/HAp composite scaffolds developed in this study exhibited good morphology/mechanical strength and HAp nanoparticles were homogeneously dispersed inside PLGA matrix. Results from the animal experiments indicate that the bioactivity of BMP‐2 released from the fibrous PLGA/HAp composite scaffolds is well maintained, which further improves the formation of new bone and the healing of segmental defects in vivo. It is concluded that BMP‐2 loaded PLGA/HAp composite scaffolds are promising for bone healing. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008; 99; 996–1006. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tissue-engineered bone regeneration
Petite, H., Viateau, V., Bensaïd, W., Meunier, A., de Pollak, C., Bourguignon, M., Oudina, K., Sedel, L., & Guillemin, G. (2000) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/79449 · Cited by 1,475
Cited by
Strategies for controlled delivery of growth factors and cells for bone regeneration
Vo, T. N., Kasper, F. K., & Mikos, A. G. (2012) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.01.016 · Cited by 666
Electrospraying of polymers with therapeutic molecules: State of the art
Bock, N., Dargaville, T. R., & Woodruff, M. A. (2012) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.03.002 · Cited by 440
Putting Electrospun Nanofibers to Work for Biomedical Research
Xie, J., Li, X., & Xia, Y. (2008) · Macromolecular Rapid Communications · doi:10.1002/marc.200800381 · Cited by 381
The biological applications of DNA nanomaterials: current challenges and future directions
Ma, W., Zhan, Y., Zhang, Y., Mao, C., Xie, X., & Lin, Y. (2021) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-021-00727-9 · Cited by 331
Phipps, M. C., Clem, W. C., Grunda, J. M., Clines, G. A., & Bellis, S. L. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.080 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Fu, Y., Nie, H., Ho, M., Wang, C., & Wang, C.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-01-25
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 996-1006
- ISSN
- 0006-3592 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0290
- OpenAlex
- W2080529347
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimized bone regeneration based on sustained release from three‐dimensional fibrous PLGA/HAp composite scaffolds loaded with BMP‐2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bit.21648
- The paper
- Fu, Y., Nie, H., Ho, M., Wang, C., & Wang, C. (2008). Optimized bone regeneration based on sustained release from three‐dimensional fibrous PLGA/HAp composite scaffolds loaded with BMP‐2. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.21648
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.