The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In vivo cleavage of transgene donors promotes nuclease‐mediated targeted integration
Abstract
Targeted DNA integration is commonly used to eliminate position effects on transgene expression. Integration can be targeted to specific sites in the genome via both homology‐based and homology‐independent processes. Both pathways start the integration process with a site‐specific break in the chromosome, typically from a zinc‐finger nuclease (ZFN). We previously described an efficient homology‐independent targeted integration technique that captures short (<100 bp) pieces of DNA at chromosomal breaks created by ZFNs. We show here that inclusion of a nuclease target site on the donor plasmid followed by in vivo nuclease cleavage of both the donor and the chromosome results in efficient integration of large, transgene‐sized DNA molecules into the chromosomal double‐strand break. Successful targeted integration via in vivo donor linearization is demonstrated at five distinct loci in two mammalian cell types, highlighting the generality of the approach. Finally, we show that CHO cells, a cell type recalcitrant to homology‐based integration, are proficient at capture of in vivo‐linearized transgene donors. Moreover, we demonstrate knockout of the hamster FUT8 gene via the simultaneous ZFN‐ or TALE nuclease‐mediated integration of an antibody cassette. Our results enable efficient targeted transgene addition to cells and organisms that fare poorly with traditional homology‐driven approaches. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013; 110: 871–880. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These two methods have seen use as genetic editing mechanisms, for gene insertion, deletion, and modulation in multiple species and cell lines [93,94,95,96,97].”
From CRISPR-Cas: Converting A Bacterial Defence Mechanism into A State-of-the-Art Genetic Manipulation Tool (2019) · cites this paper as [97]
Citations
Cites
Establishment of HIV-1 resistance in CD4+ T cells by genome editing using zinc-finger nucleases
Perez, E. E., Wang, J., Miller, J. C., Jouvenot, Y., Kim, K. A., Liu, O., Wang, N., Lee, G., Bartsevich, V. V., Lee, Y.-L., et al. (2008) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1410 · Cited by 999
Self-citationLombardo, A., Genovese, P., Beausejour, C. M., Colleoni, S., Lee, Y.-L., Kim, K. A., Ando, D., Urnov, F. D., Galli, C., Gregory, P. D., et al. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1353 · Cited by 845
Self-citationThe genomic sequence of the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cell line
Xu, X., Nagarajan, H., Lewis, N. E., Pan, S., Cai, Z., Liu, X., Chen, W., Xie, M., Wang, W., Hammond, S., et al. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1932 · Cited by 785
Generation of a triple-gene knockout mammalian cell line using engineered zinc-finger nucleases
Liu, P., Chan, E. M., Cost, G. J., Zhang, L., Wang, J., Miller, J. C., Guschin, D. Y., Reik, A., Holmes, M. C., Mott, J. E., et al. (2010) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.22654 · Cited by 107
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- 10.1101/gr.106773.110 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.1562 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.86.22.8927 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ceb.2004.03.011 · DOI
- 10.1002/bit.22751 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.1755 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0611478104 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkq512 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.91.13.6064 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90463-0 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature03556 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrg2842 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/bit.20151 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering
Gaj, T., Gersbach, C. A., & Barbas, C. F. (2013) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.04.004 · Cited by 3,820
He, X., Tan, C., Wang, F., Wang, Y., Zhou, R., Cui, D., You, W., Zhao, H., Ren, J., & Feng, B. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw064 · Cited by 338
Loureiro, A., & da Silva, G. J. (2019) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics8010018 · Cited by 129
Antibody glycoengineering strategies in mammalian cells
Wang, Q., Chung, C., Chough, S., & Betenbaugh, M. J. (2018) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.26567 · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Cristea, S., Freyvert, Y., Santiago, Y., Holmes, M. C., Urnov, F. D., Gregory, P. D., & Cost, G. J.
- Venue
- Biotechnology and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-10-23
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 871-880
- ISSN
- 0006-3592
- 1097-0290
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vivo cleavage of transgene donors promotes nuclease‐mediated targeted integration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bit.24733
- The paper
- Cristea, S., Freyvert, Y., Santiago, Y., Holmes, M. C., Urnov, F. D., Gregory, P. D., & Cost, G. J. (2013). In vivo cleavage of transgene donors promotes nuclease‐mediated targeted integration. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24733