Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In vivo cleavage of transgene donors promotes nuclease‐mediated targeted integration

Cristea, Sandra, Freyvert, Yevgeniy, Santiago, Yolanda, Holmes, Michael C., Urnov, Fyodor D., Gregory, Philip D., Cost, Gregory J.·2013·Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Abstract

Targeted DNA integration is commonly used to eliminate position effects on transgene expression. Integration can be targeted to specific sites in the genome via both homology‐based and homology‐independent processes. Both pathways start the integration process with a site‐specific break in the chromosome, typically from a zinc‐finger nuclease (ZFN). We previously described an efficient homology‐independent targeted integration technique that captures short (<100 bp) pieces of DNA at chromosomal breaks created by ZFNs. We show here that inclusion of a nuclease target site on the donor plasmid followed by in vivo nuclease cleavage of both the donor and the chromosome results in efficient integration of large, transgene‐sized DNA molecules into the chromosomal double‐strand break. Successful targeted integration via in vivo donor linearization is demonstrated at five distinct loci in two mammalian cell types, highlighting the generality of the approach. Finally, we show that CHO cells, a cell type recalcitrant to homology‐based integration, are proficient at capture of in vivo‐linearized transgene donors. Moreover, we demonstrate knockout of the hamster FUT8 gene via the simultaneous ZFN‐ or TALE nuclease‐mediated integration of an antibody cassette. Our results enable efficient targeted transgene addition to cells and organisms that fare poorly with traditional homology‐driven approaches. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013; 110: 871–880. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bit.24733

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. 10.1101/gr.106773.110 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/nbt.1562 · DOI
  3. 10.1073/pnas.86.22.8927 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.ceb.2004.03.011 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/bit.22751 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1038/nbt.1755 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1073/pnas.0611478104 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/nar/gkq512 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1073/pnas.91.13.6064 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90463-0 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/nature03556 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/nrg2842 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1002/bit.20151 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
Cristea, S., Freyvert, Y., Santiago, Y., Holmes, M. C., Urnov, F. D., Gregory, P. D., & Cost, G. J.
Venue
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-10-23
Volume
110
Issue
3
Pages
871-880
ISSN
  • 0006-3592
  • 1097-0290
Cited by
165
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vivo cleavage of transgene donors promotes nuclease‐mediated targeted integration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bit.24733
The paper
Cristea, S., Freyvert, Y., Santiago, Y., Holmes, M. C., Urnov, F. D., Gregory, P. D., & Cost, G. J. (2013). In vivo cleavage of transgene donors promotes nuclease‐mediated targeted integration. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24733