The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protective defunctioning stoma in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma
Open accessAbstract
Background: Anastomotic leak is a serious complication of resection for low rectal carcinoma. Methods: Data from a prospective multicentre study conducted between January 2000 and December 2001 were analysed to determine the early outcome after low anterior resection in patients with and without a protective stoma. The morbidity and mortality rates associated with ileostomy and colostomy closure were compared. Results: Eight hundred and eighty-one (32·3 per cent) of 2729 patients received a protective stoma after low anterior resection. Overall anastomotic leak rates were similar in patients with or without a stoma (14·5 versus 14·2 per cent respectively). The incidence of leaks that required surgical intervention was significantly lower in those with a protective stoma (3·6 versus 10·1 per cent; P < 0·001), as was the mortality rate (0·9 versus 2·0 per cent; P = 0·037). Logistic regression analysis showed that provision of a protective stoma was the most powerful independent variable for avoiding an anastomotic leak that required surgical correction. Seven hundred and twenty-four of the 881 patients who received a stoma were followed up. The overall postoperative morbidity associated with stoma closure was significantly lower for colostomy than for ileostomy (15·3 versus 22·4 per cent; P = 0·031). Conclusion: A protective stoma reduced the rate of anastomotic leakage that required surgical intervention, and mitigated the sequelae of such leakage. Colostomy closure was associated with less morbidity than closure of an ileostomy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery
Güenaga, K. F., Matos, D., & Wille-Jørgensen, P. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001544.pub4 · Cited by 914
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer
Rullier, E., Laurent, C., Garrelon, J. L., Michel, P., Saric, J., & Parneix, M. (1998) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00615.x · Cited by 895
Vignali, A., Fazio, V. W., Lavery, I. C., Milsom, J. W., Church, J. M., Hull, T. L., Strong, S. A., & Oakley, J. R. (1997) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/s1072-7515(01)00891-2 · Cited by 550
Alves, A., Panis, Y., Trancart, D., Regimbeau, J., Pocard, M., & Valleur, P. (2002) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-001-0256-4 · Cited by 505
Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery
Neutzling, C. B., Lustosa, S. A., Proenca, I. M., da Silva, E. M., & Matos, D. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003144.pub2 · Cited by 439
Quality of life in stoma patients
Nugent, K. P., Daniels, P., Stewart, B., Patankar, R., & Johnson, C. D. (1999) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1007/bf02236209 · Cited by 435
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision
Law, W.-L., Chu, K.-W., Ho, J. W. C., & Chan, C.-W. (2000) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00252-x · Cited by 381
Mechanical Bowel Preparation for Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-analysis
Bucher, P. (2004) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.139.12.1359 · Cited by 301
Enker, W. E., Merchant, N., Cohen, A. M., Lanouette, N. M., Swallow, C., Guillem, J., Paty, P., Minsky, B., Weyrauch, K., & Quan, S. H. Q. (1999) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-199910000-00010 · Cited by 299
Dehni, N., Schlegel, R. D., Cunningham, C., Guiguet, M., Tiret, E., & Parc, R. (1998) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00790.x · Cited by 264
Value of a Protective Stoma in Low Anterior Resections for Rectal Cancer
Marusch, F., Koch, A., Schmidt, U., Geiler, S., Dralle, H., Saeger, H.-D., Wolff, S., Nestler, G., Pross, M., Gastinger, I., et al. (2002) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1007/s10350-004-6384-9 · Cited by 210
Self-citationHandsewn vs. stapled anastomoses in colon and rectal surgery: A meta-analysis
MacRae, H. M., & McLeod, R. S. (1998) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1007/bf02238246 · Cited by 207
Morbidities of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for resectable rectal cancer: An overview
Ooi, B. S., Tjandra, J. J., & Green, M. D. (1999) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1007/bf02236362 · Cited by 200
Anastomotic leakage: impact on local recurrence and survival in surgery of colorectal cancer
Petersen, S., Freitag, M., Hellmich, G., & Ludwig, K. (1998) · International Journal of Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1007/s003840050158 · Cited by 189
Poon, R. T., Chu, K., Ho, J. W., Chan, C., Law, W., & Wong, J. (1999) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/pl00012331 · Cited by 189
Law, W. L., Chu, K. W., & Choi, H. K. (2002) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02082.x · Cited by 175
O'Leary, D. P., Fide, C. J., Foy, C., & Lucarotti, M. E. (2001) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01862.x · Cited by 175
Loop Ileostomy versus Loop Colostomy for Defunctioning Low Anastomoses during Rectal Cancer Surgery
Rullier, É., Toux, N. L., Laurent, C., Garrelon, J. L., Parneix, M., & Saric, J. (2001) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s002680020091 · Cited by 155
Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery
Matos, D., Atallah, Á. N., Castro, A. A., & Lustosa, S. A. S. (2001) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003144 · Cited by 138
Quality of Life of Stoma Patients: Temporary Ileostomy versus Colostomy
Silva, M. A., Ratnayake, G., & Deen, K. I. (2003) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-002-6699-4 · Cited by 112
Prospective analysis of quality of life after reversal of a defunctioning loop ileostomy
Camilleri‐Brennan, J., & Steele, R. J. (2002) · Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1046/j.1463-1318.2002.00352.x · Cited by 89
Wille-Jørgensen, P., Güenaga, K. F., Castro, A. A., & Matos, D. (2003) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1007/s10350-004-7274-x · Cited by 69
Cited by
Matthiessen, P., Hallböök, O., Rutegård, J., Simert, G., & Sjödahl, R. (2007) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3180603024 · Cited by 1,123
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Role of Defunctioning Stoma in Low Rectal Cancer Surgery
Hüser, N., Michalski, C. W., Erkan, M., Schuster, T., Rosenberg, R., Kleeff, J., & Friess, H. (2008) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e318176bf65 · Cited by 616
Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer
Tan, W. S., Tang, C. L., Shi, L., & Eu, K. W. (2009) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.6594 · Cited by 478
Chow, A., Tilney, H. S., Paraskeva, P., Jeyarajah, S., Zacharakis, E., & Purkayastha, S. (2009) · International Journal of Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1007/s00384-009-0660-z · Cited by 428
2017 WSES guidelines on colon and rectal cancer emergencies: obstruction and perforation
Pisano, M., Zorcolo, L., Merli, C., Cimbanassi, S., Poiasina, E., Ceresoli, M., Agresta, F., Allievi, N., Bellanova, G., Coccolini, F., et al. (2018) · World Journal of Emergency Surgery · doi:10.1186/s13017-018-0192-3 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Gastinger, I., Marusch, F., Steinert, R., Wolff, S., Koeckerling, F., & Lippert, H.
- Venue
- British Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-07-04
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1137-1142
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2026336603
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 8.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
