Cited by 78Treatment of Major DepressionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Cortical thickness and subcortical structure volume abnormalities in patients with major depression with and without anxious symptoms

Open access
Zhao, Ke, Liu, Haiyan, Yan, Rui, Hua, Lingling, Chen, Yu, Shi, Jiabo, Lu, Qing, Yao, Zhijian·2017·Brain and Behavior

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anxious depression is one of the common subtypes of major depressive disorder (MDD). Clinically, patients with anxious depression exhibit more severe depressive symptoms than patients with nonanxious depression. The aim of the present study was to explore the common and differing cortical and subcortical structural changes between patients with anxious and nonanxious depression. METHODS: = 43) that were matched for age, sex, and education level. All participants underwent T1-weighted MRI. The Freesurfer, which uses a set of automated sequences to analyze the abnormal changes of cortical thickness, cortical and subcortical structures, was used to process the T1 images. RESULTS: Compared to controls, MDD patients showed thinner cortical thickness in the left inferior temporal, the right superior temporal, and the right parsorbitalis, and a smaller volume of the left hippocampus. Compared to nonanxious depression, anxious depressive patients showed a cortical thinning of the left superior frontal and right superior temporal, as well as the right lingual, and significantly increased subcortical volume of the bilateral caudate nuclei. Correlation analysis showed that the volumes of the bilateral caudate nuclei were directly proportional to the anxiety/somatization factor score. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that smaller hippocampal volume and atrophic prefrontal and temporal cortices might be a common pattern of cortical and subcortical alterations in patients with depression and/or anxiety. However, the change in the caudate nucleus volume may be indicative of anxious depression and may potentially be used to distinguish anxious from nonanxious depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/brb3.754

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, K., Liu, H., Yan, R., Hua, L., Chen, Y., Shi, J., Lu, Q., & Yao, Z.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing Brain Hospital (CN)
  • Research Center of Learning Science Southeast University Nanjing China
Corresponding author
Yao, Zhijian
Venue
Brain and Behavior
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-06-27
Volume
7
Issue
8
Pages
e00754-e00754
ISSN
  • 2157-9032 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-3279
OpenAlex
W2662725288
Cited by
78
References
50
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2
FWCI
6.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain and Behavior (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81571639, 61372032)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20160142)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
anxious depression, major depressive disorder, cortical thickness, subcortical volume, hippocampal volume, caudate nucleus, cortical thinning, somatization, anxiety symptoms, prefrontal cortex, temporal cortex, brain structural changes
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Caudate Nucleus, Cerebral Cortex, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Organ Size, Statistics as Topic, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review