Cited by 56Treatment of Major DepressionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Structural brain changes in patients with recurrent major depressive disorder presenting with anxiety symptoms

Inkster, Becky, Rao, Anil W., Ridler, Khanum, Nichols, Thomas E., Saemann, Philipp G., Auer, Dorothee P., Holsboer, Florian, Tozzi, Federica +3 more·2011·Journal of Neuroimaging

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Major depressive disorder (MDD) presents with extensive clinical heterogeneity. In particular, overlap with anxiety symptoms is common during depressive episodes and as a comorbid disorder. The aim of this study was to test for morphological brain differences between patients having a history of recurrent MDD with, and without, anxiety symptoms (MDD+A and MDD-A). METHODS: T1-weighted magnetic resonance images of age-, gender- and ethnically matched groups of MDD+A (n= 49) and MDD-A (n= 96) patients were available for voxel-based morphometry analysis of regional gray matter (GM) volume differences. Brain structural images were also contrasted with 183 age-, gender-, and ethnicity-matched healthy controls. RESULTS: MDD+A patients had greater GM volume (P(FWE) = .002) than MDD-A patients in the right temporal cortex extending from the mid-posterior superior temporal gyrus into the posterior middle and inferior temporal gyrus. The MDD patients together showed lower GM volume than healthy controls in the superior parietal lobe. CONCLUSIONS: Regional volume differences in patients are consistent with altered neuronal or glial microstructure. The temporolateral cortical differences distinguishing the 2 MDD groups suggest neurobiological differences related to the expression of anxiety symptoms in depression and provide further rationale for considering these groups independently for therapeutic outcomes studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2010.00515.x

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Inkster, B., Rao, A. W., Ridler, K., Nichols, T. E., Saemann, P. G., Auer, D. P., Holsboer, F., Tozzi, F., Muglia, P., Merlo-Pich, E., & Matthews, P. M.
Affiliations
GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
Venue
Journal of Neuroimaging
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10-26
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
375-382
ISSN
1051-2284 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994094087
Cited by
56
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroimaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
major depressive disorder, recurrent depression, anxiety symptoms, comorbidities, gray matter volume, brain structure, right temporal cortex, superior parietal lobule, voxel-based morphometry
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Brain, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review