CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 66

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Smoothing the circular economy transition: The role of resources and capabilities enablers

Seles, Bruno Michel Roman Pais, Mascarenhas, Janaina, Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz, Trevisan, Adriana Hoffman·2022·Business Strategy and the Environment
DOI 10.1002/bse.2985
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A transition to the circular economy may be a solution to dissociate financial growth from negative environmental impacts. However, this transition can require an in‐depth understanding of which enablers an organization requires. This research aims to identify the enablers of the circular economy presented in the literature and analyze them against the theories about resources, capabilities, and dynamic capabilities and against the ReSOLVE framework. Through a systematic literature review, this research identified thirteen enablers grouped in three different dimensions (management and people; structure, product, and process; and relationship with stakeholders). Some enablers can be considered as resources, capabilities, or dynamic capabilities and are capable of helping firms to reach a successful transition to the circularity. They may even be sources of competitive advantage in the context of circular economy, mainly the enablers of the dimension “structure, product, and process.” The dimensions of enablers have direct and indirect links with the ReSOLVE framework action areas. Through the discussions of some real cases, it was possible to exemplify how some enablers lead companies to circularity. Besides that, this research posits seven research gaps for future studies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bse.2985

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 65

  1. 10.1680/jwarm.16.00011 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1002/smj.4250140105 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Antwi S. K., 2015, Qualitative and quantitative research paradigms in business research: A philosophical reflection, European Journal of Business and Management, 7, 217
  4. 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102292 · DOI
  5. 10.1108/MD-07-2018-0724 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/00207543.2018.1542176 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/bse.2466 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00873.x · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139840 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.349 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104673 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.001 · DOI
  13. Emerald. (2019).Management Decision Special Issue “Management decision and the circular economy: sustainability challenges and opportunities for managers in emerging economies”.https://www.emerald.com/insight/publication/issn/0025-1747/vol/57/iss/4
  14. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122263 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/0008125617752695 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.jwb.2017.11.003 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/bse · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122336 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.168 · DOI
  21. 10.3390/su9061068 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120375 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.12.017 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101596 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110416 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1108/MD-09-2018-0990 · DOI
  27. 10.1177/1558689806298224 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1002/bse.2447 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1002/csr.2020 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.01.009 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.106 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105013 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.omega.2015.01.002 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.spc.2020.09.008 · DOI
  38. 10.1111/j.1745-493X.1997.tb00026.x · DOI
  39. 10.1108/MD-10-2018-1111 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00039-7 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1002/bse.2515 · DOI
  42. 10.1111/jiec.12598 · DOI
  43. 10.1080/19397038.2018.1508316 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118821 · DOI
  45. 10.1007/s10272-018-0729-4 · DOI
  46. Oxford Dictionary. (2020).Enabler.https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/enabler?q=enabler
  47. 10.3390/su11020391 · DOI
  48. 10.1002/csr.1761 · DOI
  49. 10.1002/tie.21917 · DOI
  50. 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00328.x · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.005 · DOI
  52. 10.1080/00207543.2019.1680896 · DOI
  53. 10.3390/su12208641 · DOI
  54. 10.1002/bse.2472 · DOI
  55. 10.1111/jiec.12732 · DOI
  56. 10.1108/MD-07-2018-0844 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.033 · DOI
  58. 10.1002/bse.2834 · DOI
  59. 10.1177/2345678906293042 · DOI
  60. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.22201/fca.24488410e.2019.1806 · DOI
  63. 10.1002/smj.4250050207 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105016 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.067 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Seles, B. M. R. P., Mascarenhas, J., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., & Trevisan, A. H.
Affiliations
  • Production Engineering Department, São Carlos School of Engineering University of São Paulo São Carlos Brazil
  • EM Normandie Business School, Métis Lab Paris France
ORCID
Venue
Business Strategy and the Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-01-25
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
1814-1837
ISSN
  • 0964-4733
  • 1099-0836
DOI
10.1002/bse.2985
Cited by
66
References
8
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review