Cited by 1,265Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessSustainable Industrial Ecology

Implementation of Circular Economy Business Models by Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs): Barriers and Enablers

Open access
Rizos, Vasileios, Behrens, Arno, Van der Gaast, Wytze, Hofman, Erwin, Ioannou, Anastasia, Kafyeke, Terri, Flamos, Alexandros, Rinaldi, Roberto +3 more·2016·Sustainability

Abstract

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are increasingly aware of the benefits of closing loops and improving resource efficiency, such as saving material costs, creating competitive advantages, and accessing new markets. At the same time, however, various barriers pose challenges to small businesses in their transition to a circular economy, namely a lack of financial resources and lack of technical skills. The aim of this paper is to increase knowledge and understanding about the barriers and enablers experienced by SMEs when implementing circular economy business models. Looking first at the barriers that prevent SMEs from realising the benefits of the circular economy, an investigation is carried out in the form of a literature review and an analysis of a sample of SME case studies that are featured on the GreenEcoNet EU-funded web platform. Several enabling factors that help SMEs adopt circular economy practices are then identified. The paper concludes that although various policy instruments are available to help SMEs incorporate circular economy principles into their business models, several barriers remain. The authors recommend that European and national policies strengthen their focus on greening consumer preferences, market value chains and company cultures, and support the recognition of SMEs’ green business models. This can be achieved through the creation of dedicated marketplaces and communities of practice, for example.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su8111212

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Companies often perceive circular economy strategies as too risky and lacking economic viability.

    “and that they often perceive CE strategies as too risky and lacking economic viability [11,14,15].”

    From Is Prolonging the Lifetime of Passive Durable Products a Low-Hanging Fruit of a Circular Economy? A Multiple Case Study (2019) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Literature Review (section 2; page not provided) says that limited examples of successful circular business models create uncertainty, and that upfront costs and payback periods are important concerns for SMEs. It does not establish that companies often regard circular economy strategies as too risky or economically unviable; those conclusions are stronger and broader than the passages support. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Companies lack willingness, awareness, and resources to engage with circular economy.

    “A common major finding in this literature is that companies lack willingness, awareness, and resources to engage with CE”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Liu, Y.; Bai, Y. An exploration of firms' awareness and behavior of developing circular economy: An empirical research in China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2014, 87, 145-152. [CrossRef] · DOI
  2. Fernández-Viñé, M.B.; Gómez-Navarro, T.; Capuz-Rizo, S.F. Eco-efficiency in the SME of Venezuela. Current status and future perspectives. J. Clean. Prod. 2010, 18, 736-746. [CrossRef] · DOI
  3. Luthra, S.; Kumar, V.; Kumar, S.; Haleem, A. Barriers to implement green supply chain management in automobile industry using interpretive structural modeling technique: An Indian perspective. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 2011, 4, 231-257. [CrossRef] · DOI
  4. Chan, E.S.W.; Hon, A.H.Y.; Chan, W.; Okumus, F. What drives employees' intentions to implement green practices in hotels? The role of knowledge, awareness, concern and ecological behaviour. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2014, 40, 20-28. [CrossRef] · DOI
  5. Bradford, J.; Fraser, E.D.G. Local Authorities, Climate Change and Small and Medium Enterprises: Identifying Effective Policy Instruments to Reduce Energy Use and Carbon Emissions. Corp. Soc. Resp. Environ. Manag. 2007, 15, 156-172. [CrossRef] · DOI
  6. Dekoninck, E.A.; Domingo, L.; O'Hare, A.J.; Pigosso, D.C.A.; Reyes, T.; Troussier, N. Defining the challenges for ecodesign implementation in companies: Development and consolidation of a framework. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 135, 410-425. [CrossRef] · DOI
  7. Oreg, S. Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 680-693. [CrossRef] · DOI
  8. Trianni, A.; Cango, E. Dealing with barriers to energy efficiency and SMEs: Some empirical evidences. Energy 2012, 37, 494-504. [CrossRef] · DOI
  9. Kang, M.-J.; Wimmer, R. Product service systems as systemic cures for obese consumption and production. J. Clean. Prod. 2008, 16, 1146-1152. [CrossRef] · DOI
  10. Mont, O. Drivers and barriers for shifting towards more service-oriented businesses: Analysis of the PSS field and contributions from Sweden. J. Sustain. Prod. Des. 2002, 2, 89-103. [CrossRef] · DOI
  11. Hyz, A.B. Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Greece-Barriers in Access to Banking Services. An Empirical Investigation. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. Stud. 2011, 2, 2.
  12. Parker, C.M.; Redmond, J.; Simpson, M. A review of interventions to encourage SMEs to make environmental improvements. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 2009, 27, 279-301. [CrossRef] · DOI
  13. Wilts, H.; von Gries, N.; Bahn-Walkowiak, B. From Waste Management to Resource Efficiency-The Need for Policy Mixes. Sustainability 2016, 8, 622. [CrossRef] · DOI
  14. Geng, Y.; Doberstein, B. Developing the circular economy in China: Challenges and opportunities for achieving "leapfrog development". Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World 2008, 15, 231-239. [CrossRef] · DOI
  15. Sarkis, J.; Helms, M.M.; Hervani, A.A. Reverse logistics and social sustainability. Corp. Soc. Resp. Environ. Manag. 2010, 17, 337-354. [CrossRef] · DOI
  16. Linder, M.; Williander, M. Circular Business Model Innovation: Inherent Uncertainties. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2015. [CrossRef] · DOI
  17. Murillo-Luna, J.L.; Garcés-Ayerbe, C.; Rivera-Torres, P. Barriers to the adoption of proactive environmental strategies. J. Clean. Prod. 2011, 19, 1417-1425. [CrossRef] · DOI
  18. Van Eijk, F. Barriers & Drivers towards a Circular Economy. Literature Review; A-140315-R-Final; Accelerations: Naarden, The Netherlands, 2015.
  19. Romero, D.; Molina, A. Collaborative networked organisations and customer communities: Value co-creation and co-innovation in the networking era. Prod. Plan. Control. 2011, 22, 447-472. [CrossRef] · DOI
  20. Parlikad, A.K.; Mcfarlane, D.; Fleisch, E.; Gross, S. The Role of Product Identity in End-of-Life Decision Making; Auto-ID Center: Cambridge, UK, 2003.
  21. Zhu, Q.; Geng, Y. Drivers and barriers of extended supply chain practices for energy saving and emission reduction among Chinese manufacturers. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 40, 6-12. [CrossRef] · DOI
  22. Sivertsson, O.; Tell, J. Barriers to Business Model Innovation in Swedish Agriculture. Sustainability 2015, 7, 1957-1969. [CrossRef] · DOI
  23. Meqdadi, O.; Johnsenb, T.; Johnsenc, R. The Role of SME Suppliers in Implementing Sustainability. In Proceedings of the IPSERA 2012 Conference, Napoli, Italy, 1-4 April 2012.
  24. Wooi, G.C.; Zailani, S. Green Supply Chain Initiatives: Investigation on the Barriers in the Context of SMEs in Malaysia. Int. Bus. Manag. 2010, 4, 20-27.
  25. Zhu, Q.; Sarkis, J.; Lai, K.-H.; Geng, Y. The role of organizational size in the adoption of green supply chain management practices in China. Corp. Soc. Resp. Environ. Manag. 2008, 15, 322-337. [CrossRef] · DOI
  26. Wycherley, I. Greening supply chains: The case of the body shop international. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 1999, 8, 120-127. [CrossRef] · DOI
  27. Edbring, E.G.; Lehner, M.; Mont, O. Exploring consumer attitudes to alternative models of consumption: motivations and barriers. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 123, 5-15. [CrossRef] · DOI
  28. Planing, P. Business Model Innovation in a Circular Economy. Reasons for Non-Acceptance of Circular Business Models. Open J. Bus. Model Innov. 2015, in press.
  29. Yin, R.K. Case Study Research Design and Methods, 4th ed.; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2009.
  30. Yin, R.K. Case Study Research Design and Methods, 2nd ed.; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1994.
  31. Stake, R.E. The Art of Case Study Research; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1995.
  32. Rozman Cafuta, M. Open Space Evaluation Methodology and Three Dimensional Evaluation Model as a Base for Sustainable Development Tracking. Sustainability 2015, 7, 13690-13712. [CrossRef] · DOI
  33. Riisgaard, H.; Mosgaard, M.; Zacho, K.O. Local Circles in a Circular Economy-The Case of Smartphone Repair in Denmark. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. 2016, 5, 109-124.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rizos, V., Behrens, A., Van der Gaast, W., Hofman, E., Ioannou, A., Kafyeke, T., Flamos, A., Rinaldi, R., Papadelis, S., Hirschnitz-Garbers, M., & Topi, C.
Affiliations
  • Centre for European Policy Studies (BE)
  • JIN Climate and Sustainability, Laan Corpus den Hoorn 300, 9728 JT Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Department of Industrial Management & Technology, University of Piraeus (UNIPI), 80, Karaoli & Dimitriou Street, 185 34 Piraeus, Greece
  • Ecologic Institute (DE)
  • University of Piraeus (GR)
  • Stockholm Environment Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Rizos, Vasileios
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2016-11-23
Volume
8
Issue
11
Pages
1212
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2554300231
Cited by
1,265
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 150 · 2025: 189 · 2024: 169 · 2023: 198 · 2022: 185 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7
FWCI
82.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Commission (FP7 post-grant open access publishing funds)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Sustainable Industrial Ecology
Keywords
circular economy, circular business models, small and medium-sized enterprises, barriers to adoption, enabling factors, resource efficiency, communities of practice, green business models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review