Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 241

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A study of determinant factors of stakeholder environmental pressure perceived by industrial companies

González‐Benito, Javier, González‐Benito, Óscar·2010·Business Strategy and the Environment

Abstract

Although several articles have studied the effect that stakeholder pressure has on the environmental behavior of firms, little research has attempted to identify the contingencies that explain such pressure. This article investigates the effects of six relevant variables on stakeholder environmental pressure perceived by industrial companies: size, internationalization, location of manufacturing activities, position in the supply chain, industrial sector, and managerial values and attitudes. The effect is theoretically determined by distinguishing between pressure intensity and perception capacity and empirically tested with a sample of 186 Spanish manufacturers. The analyses reveal two dimensions of stakeholder pressure, governmental and nongovernmental, and show that variables such as environmental awareness among managers, internationalization, industrial sector and company size play important roles in determining both dimensions. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bse.631

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 85

  1. 10.2307/256973 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/S0305-0483(01)00033-0 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00006-6 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.2307/256942 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.022 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.2307/3146906 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00135-1 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.5465/AME.1998.650515 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2001.tb00077.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1002/smj.409 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1002/bse.480 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00137-6 · doi:10.1016/s0925-5273(98)00137-6
  13. 10.1002/smj.299 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1998.tb01358.x · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490976 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.5465/AME.2002.8540373 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.2307/258888 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.2307/1556358 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.2307/256737 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1108/02656710110392638 · doi:10.1108/02656710110392638
  21. 10.1080/0020754021000024175 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00036-6 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00005-X · doi:10.1016/s0925-5273(98)00005-x
  24. 10.1287/mnsc.46.8.1059.12030 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1108/09600039810205935 · doi:10.1108/09600039810205935
  26. 10.1108/14720700410547512 · doi:10.1108/14720700410547512
  27. 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1996.tb00169.x · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.2307/1556359 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540226 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/0007-6813(91)90012-K · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.2307/259074 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1002/bse.450 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1108/01443579510094071 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/S0272-6963(97)00004-1 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.2307/258963 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1023/A:1006356928957 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.2307/256876 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1080/00343409750129643 · doi:10.1080/00343409750129643
  39. Hunt CB, 1990, Proactive environmental management: avoiding the toxic trap, Sloan Management Review, 31, 7
  40. Inman RA, 1999, Environmental management: new challenges for production and inventory managers, Production and Inventory Management Journal, 40, 46
  41. Jaffe AB, 1995, Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us?, Journal of Economic Literature, 33, 132
  42. 10.5465/amr.1995.9512280034 · doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9512280034 · Paper page
  43. 10.1111/1467-9787.00248 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1002/smj.230 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.5465/amj.2006.20785799 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Kenelly JJ, 2002, Degree of internationalization and corporate environmental performance: is there a link?, International Journal of Management, 19, 478
  47. 10.5465/AMR.2007.25275680 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.5465/APBPP.2001.6133789 · doi:10.5465/apbpp.2001.6133789
  49. 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb00900.x · DOI · Paper page
  50. Levy DL, 1995, The environmental practices and performance of transnational corporations, Transnational Corporations, 4, 44
  51. 10.1111/j.1435-5597.2000.tb00767.x · doi:10.1111/j.1435-5597.2000.tb00767.x
  52. Magretta J, 1997, Growth through global sustainability: an interview with Monsanto's CEO, Robert B. Shapiro, Harvard Business Review, 75, 78
  53. 10.1108/01443570610641648 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Marimón F, 2006, ISO9000, ISO14001 y Otros Estándares de Gestión: Pasado, Presente y Futuro, 243
  55. 10.2307/41165902 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00109-2 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.2307/259247 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Plaza‐ÚbedaJA Burgos‐JiménezJ VázquezDA Liston‐HeyesC.2008.The ‘win–win’ paradigm and stakeholder integration.Business Strategy and the Environment. DOI: 10.1002/bse.593 · DOI
  59. Porter ME, 1995, Green and competitive: ending the stalemate, Harvard Business Review, 73, 120
  60. 10.1016/S0305-0483(01)00042-1 · doi:10.1016/s0305-0483(01)00042-1
  61. 10.1002/bse.3280010104 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199804)19:4<363::AID-SMJ974>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.2307/257052 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1002/bse.321 · doi:10.1002/bse.321
  65. 10.1016/0166-4972(95)96612-W · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1108/01443570110390390 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Schaltegger S, 2003, An Introduction to Corporate Environmental Management: Striving for Sustainability
  68. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.02.006 · DOI
  69. 10.2307/1556361 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1002/smj.439 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1177/0021886399351008 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199808)19:8<729::AID-SMJ967>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.2307/258961 · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.1007/s10551-005-7054-0 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2004.01.009 · DOI
  76. US Department of Commerce, 1996, Pollution Abatement Costs and Expenditures: 1994
  77. 10.1016/0925-5273(96)00040-0 · DOI
  78. 10.5465/AME.2002.7173581 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.1016/j.emj.2004.09.013 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1111/j.1745-493X.1998.tb00042.x · DOI · Paper page
  81. Wilson RC, 2000, ISO 14000 insight. Automakers require supplier certification, Pollution Engineering, 32, 27
  82. 10.1016/S0007-6813(05)80188-0 · DOI
  83. Wong LT, 2004, Stakeholder influences on environmental management practices: a study of fleet operations in Hong Kong (SAR), China, Transportation Journal, 43, 22
  84. 10.1108/09600039510083925 · DOI · Paper page
  85. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0925(199912)6:4<181::AID-EMA115>3.0.CO;2-1 · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0925(199912)6:4<181::aid-ema115>3.0.co;2-1

Metadata

Authors
González‐Benito, J., & González‐Benito, Ó.
Venue
Business Strategy and the Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-11-27
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
164-181
ISSN
  • 0964-4733 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0836
OpenAlex
W2066594927
Cited by
241
References
2
FWCI
15.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.