Cited by 8Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Effect of continuing care for people with cocaine dependence on criminal justice sentences

Open access
Wimberly, Alexandra S., Hyatt, Jordan M., McKay, James R.·2018·Behavioral Sciences & the Law

Abstract

While continuing care for substance use treatment has been associated with reduced involvement in the criminal justice system, much of this research lacks random assignment to continuing care and so is limited by self‐selection bias. This study sought to determine the impact of adding telephone‐based continuing care to intensive outpatient programs on criminal justice outcomes for people with cocaine dependence. In three continuing care studies, spanning 1998–2008, participants were randomly assigned to an intensive outpatient program or an intensive outpatient program plus a telephone‐based continuing care intervention. Cocaine‐dependent participants from these three studies were included in the analyses, with outcomes derived from a dataset of jurisdiction‐wide criminal sentences from a state sentencing agency. Multiple logistic regression was employed to examine the odds of a criminal conviction occurring in the 4 years after enrollment in a continuing care study. The results showed that, controlling for a criminal sentence in the previous year, gender, age, and continuing care study, people with cocaine dependence randomized to an intensive outpatient program plus a telephone‐based continuing care intervention had 54% lower odds (p = 0.05, odds ratio = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.20–1.02) of a criminal sentence in the 4 years after enrollment in the continuing care study, compared with those randomized to an intensive outpatient program alone. We can conclude that adding telephone monitoring and counseling to intensive outpatient programs is associated with fewer criminal convictions over a 4‐year follow‐up period compared with intensive outpatient programs alone.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bsl.2330

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bonta J Andrews D 2010 Viewing offender assessment and rehabilitation through the lens of the risk-need-responsivity model McNeil F Raynor P Trotter C Offender supervision: New directions in theory, research and practice 19 40 Routledge
  2. Carson EA 2015 Prisoners in 2014 Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin NCJ 248955
  3. Kaeble D Glaze L Tsoutis A Minton T 2015 Correctional population in the United States, 2014 Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin (NCJ 249513)

Cited by

Authors
Wimberly, A. S., Hyatt, J. M., & McKay, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Drexel University (US)
  • Philadelphia VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Wimberly, Alexandra S.
Venue
Behavioral Sciences & the Law
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
116-129
ISSN
  • 0735-3936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0798
OpenAlex
W2789833149
Cited by
8
References
55
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioral Sciences & the Law (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (K24 DA029062, F31 DA038429, R01 DA020623, K02 DA000361; National Institute of Health Grant/Award Number: 5T32DA037801)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
cocaine dependence, continuing care, intensive outpatient treatment, criminal conviction, addiction treatment, random assignment, self-selection bias, criminal justice involvement
MeSH terms
Adult, Continuity of Patient Care, Counseling, Criminal Law, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Cocaine-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review