Cited by 107Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesSchizophrenia research and treatment

Effects of involuntary outpatient commitment on subjective quality of life in persons with severe mental illness

Swanson, Jeffrey W., Swartz, Marvin S., Elbogen, Eric B., Wagner, H. Ryan, Burns, Barbara J.·2003·Behavioral Sciences & the Law

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that involuntary outpatient commitment (OPC), when appropriately applied, can improve adherence with psychiatric treatment, decrease hospital recidivism and arrests, and lower the risk of violent behavior in persons with severe mental illness. Presumably these are benefits that improve quality of life (QOL); however, insofar as OPC involves legal coercion, the undesirable aspects of OPC could also exert a negative effect on quality of life, thus offsetting clinical benefits. Involuntarily hospitalized subjects, awaiting discharge under outpatient commitment, were randomly assigned to be released or continue under outpatient commitment in the community after hospital discharge, and were followed for one year. Quality of life was measured at baseline and 12 months follow-up. Treatment characteristics and clinical outcomes were also measured. Subjects who underwent longer periods of outpatient commitment had significantly greater quality of life as measured at the end of the 1 year study. Multivariable analysis showed that the effect of OPC on QOL was mediated by greater treatment adherence and lower symptom scores. However, perceived coercion moderated the effect of OPC on QOL. Involuntary outpatient commitment, when sustained over time, indirectly exerts a positive effect on subjective quality of life for persons with SMI, at least in part by improving treatment adherence and lowering symptomatology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bsl.548

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swanson, J. W., Swartz, M. S., Elbogen, E. B., Wagner, H. R., & Burns, B. J.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Swanson, Jeffrey W.
Venue
Behavioral Sciences & the Law
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-07
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
473-491
ISSN
  • 0735-3936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0798
OpenAlex
W2006196101
Cited by
107
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Sciences & the Law (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh048103-08, 5p50mh051410-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50-MH51410-02, R01-MH48103-05)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
involuntary outpatient commitment, subjective quality of life, severe mental illness, medication adherence, perceived coercion, psychiatric hospitalization, symptom severity, community reintegration
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Coercion, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Female, Ill-Housed Persons, Humans, Male, Patient Compliance, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index, United States, Violence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review