Cited by 84Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesSchizophrenia research and treatment

Effectiveness and outcomes of assisted outpatient treatment in New York State

Phelan, Jo C., Sinkewicz, Marilyn, Castille, Dorothy M., Huz, Steven, Link, Bruce G.·2010·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Outpatient commitment has been heralded as a necessary intervention that improves psychiatric outcomes and quality of life, and it has been criticized on the grounds that effective treatment must be voluntary and that outpatient commitment has negative unintended consequences. Because few methodologically strong data exist, this study evaluated New York State's outpatient commitment program with the objective of augmenting the existing literature. METHODS: A total of 76 individuals recently mandated to outpatient commitment and 108 individuals (comparison group) recently discharged from psychiatric hospitals in the Bronx and Queens who were attending the same outpatient facilities as the group mandated to outpatient commitment were followed for one year and compared in regard to psychotic symptoms, suicide risk, serious violence perpetration, quality of life, illness-related social functioning, and perceived coercion and stigma. Propensity score matching and generalized estimating equations were used to achieve the strongest causal inference possible without an experimental design. RESULTS: Serious violence perpetration and suicide risk were lower and illness-related social functioning was higher (p<.05 for all) in the outpatient commitment group than in the comparison group. Psychotic symptoms and quality of life did not differ significantly between the two groups. Potential unintended consequences were not evident: the outpatient commitment group reported marginally less (p<.10) stigma and coercion than the comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient commitment in New York State affects many lives; therefore, it is reassuring that negative consequences were not observed. Rather, people's lives seem modestly improved by outpatient commitment. However, because outpatient commitment included treatment and other enhancements, these findings should be interpreted in terms of the overall impact of outpatient commitment, not of legal coercion per se. As such, the results do not support the expansion of coercion in psychiatric treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ps.2010.61.2.137

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phelan, J. C., Sinkewicz, M., Castille, D. M., Huz, S., & Link, B. G.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2010-02
Volume
61
Issue
2
Pages
137-143
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W1969710454
Cited by
84
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
outpatient commitment, coercion in mental health care, suicide risk, psychotic symptoms, quality of life, stigma, psychiatric hospital discharge
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adult, Ambulatory Care, Antisocial Personality Disorder, Mental Disorders, Coercion, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Community Mental Health Centers, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New York, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Discharge, Prejudice, Psychotic Disorders, Quality of Life, Social Adjustment, Suicide, Urban Population, Violence, Patient Satisfaction, Case Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review