The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Statistical process monitoring: basics and beyond
Abstract
This paper provides an overview and analysis of statistical process monitoring methods for fault detection, identification and reconstruction. Several fault detection indices in the literature are analyzed and unified. Fault reconstruction for both sensor and process faults is presented which extends the traditional missing value replacement method. Fault diagnosis methods that have appeared recently are reviewed. The reconstruction‐based approach and the contribution‐based approach are analyzed and compared with simulation and industrial examples. The complementary nature of the reconstruction‐ and contribution‐based approaches is highlighted. An industrial example of polyester film process monitoring is given to demonstrate the power of the contribution‐ and reconstruction‐based approaches in a hierarchical monitoring framework. Finally we demonstrate that the reconstruction‐based framework provides a convenient way for fault analysis, including fault detectability, reconstructability and identifiability conditions, resolving many theoretical issues in process monitoring. Additional topics are summarized at the end of the paper for future investigation. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Data Mining and Analytics in the Process Industry: The Role of Machine Learning
Ge, Z., Song, Z., Ding, S. X., & Huang, B. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2756872 · Cited by 922
“multi-model/mixture PCA, adaptive/recursive PCA, dynamic PCA, multiway PCA, and so on [32]–[41].”
MethodReconstruction-based contribution for process monitoring
Alcala, C. F., & Qin, S. J. (2009) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2009.02.027 · Cited by 567
Review of adaptation mechanisms for data-driven soft sensors
Kadlec, P., Grbić, R., & Gabrys, B. (2011) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2010.07.034 · Cited by 517
Multimode process monitoring with Bayesian inference‐based finite Gaussian mixture models
Yu, J., & Qin, S. J. (2008) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.11515 · Cited by 494
Tahan, M., Tsoutsanis, E., Muhammad, M., & Abdul Karim, Z. A. (2017) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.04.048 · Cited by 482
Jiang, Q., Yan, X., & Huang, B. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2015.2466557 · Cited by 361
Advances and opportunities in machine learning for process data analytics
Qin, S. J., & Chiang, L. H. (2019) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.04.003 · Cited by 351
Self-citationShang, C., Yang, F., Gao, X., Huang, X., Suykens, J. A. K., & Huang, D. (2015) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.14888 · Cited by 300
Challenges in the Development of Soft Sensors for Bioprocesses: A Critical Review
Brunner, V., Siegl, M., Geier, D., & Becker, T. (2021) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.722202 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Joe Qin, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemometrics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 8-9
- Pages
- 480-502
- ISSN
- 0886-9383 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-128X
- OpenAlex
- W2169347809
- Cited by
- 1,582
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.