The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Snail, Slug, and Smad‐interacting protein 1 as novel parameters of disease aggressiveness in metastatic ovarian and breast carcinoma
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: It was demonstrated previously that the Snail family of transcription factors and Smad‐interacting protein 1 (Sip1) regulate E‐cadherin and matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP‐2) expression, cellular morphology, and invasion in carcinoma. For the current study, the authors analyzed the relation between the expression of Snail, Slug, and Sip1; the expression of MMP‐2 and E‐cadherin; and clinical parameters in patients with metastatic ovarian and breast carcinoma. METHODS: One hundred one fresh‐frozen, malignant effusions from patients who were diagnosed with gynecologic carcinomas (78 ovarian carcinomas and 23 breast carcinomas) were studied for mRNA expression of Snail, Slug, Sip1, MMP‐2, and E‐cadherin using reverse transcriptase‐polymerase chain reaction analysis. Snail mRNA and E‐cadherin protein expression levels also were studied in ovarian carcinoma effusions using in situ hybridization and immunocytochemistry. The results were analyzed for possible correlation with clinicopathologic parameters in both tumor types. RESULTS: E‐cadherin mRNA expression was lower in breast carcinoma (P = 0.001), whereas Snail expression was higher (P = 0.003). The Snail/E‐cadherin ratio (P < 0.001) and the Sip1/E‐cadherin ratio (P = 0.002) were higher in breast carcinomas. Sip1 mRNA expression (P < 0.001) and Slug mRNA expression (P < 0.001) were correlated with the expression of MMP‐2 in ovarian carcinomas. The Sip1/E‐cadherin ratio was higher in primary ovarian carcinomas at the time of diagnosis compared with postchemotherapy ovarian carcinoma effusions (P = 0.003), higher in Stage IV tumors compared with Stage III tumors (P = 0.049), and higher in pleural effusions compared with peritoneal effusions (P = 0.044). In a univariate survival analysis of patients with ovarian carcinoma, a high Sip1/E‐cadherin ratio predicted poor overall survival (P = 0.018). High E‐cadherin mRNA expression predicted better disease‐free survival (P = 0.023), with a similar trend for a low Slug/E‐cadherin ratio (P = 0.07). High Snail mRNA expression predicted shorter effusion‐free survival (P = 0.008), disease‐free survival (P = 0.03), and overall survival (P = 0.008) in patients with breast carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Transcription factors that regulate E‐cadherin were expressed differentially in metastatic ovarian and breast carcinoma. Snail may predict a poor outcome in patients who have breast carcinoma metastatic to effusions. E‐cadherin expression generally was conserved in effusions from patients with ovarian carcinoma, but the subset of patients with postulated Sip1‐induced repression of this adhesion molecule had a significantly worse outcome. This finding was in agreement with the stronger suppression of E‐cadherin by Snail and Sip1 in breast carcinoma effusions, a clinical condition associated with extremely poor survival. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New functions for the matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression
Egeblad, M., & Werb, Z. (2002) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc745 · Cited by 6,108
Cisplatin: mode of cytotoxic action and molecular basis of resistance
Siddik, Z. H. (2003) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1206933 · Cited by 3,335
The snail superfamily of zinc-finger transcription factors
Nieto, M. A. (2002) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm757 · Cited by 1,719
Vleminckx, K., Vakaet, L., Mareel, M., Fiers, W., & Van Roy, F. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90143-m · Cited by 1,656
Kosary, C. L. (1994) · Seminars in Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1002/ssu.2980100107 · Cited by 417
Cited by
Transitions between epithelial and mesenchymal states: acquisition of malignant and stem cell traits
Polyak, K., & Weinberg, R. A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2620 · Cited by 3,302
Snail, Zeb and bHLH factors in tumour progression: An alliance against the epithelial phenotype?
Peinado, H., Olmeda, D., & Cano, A. (2007) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2131 · Cited by 3,121
Park, S.-M., Gaur, A. B., Lengyel, E., & Peter, M. E. (2008) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1640608 · Cited by 2,272
Involvement of Members of the Cadherin Superfamily in Cancer
Berx, G., & van Roy, F. (2009) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a003129 · Cited by 709
SIP1/ZEB2 induces EMT by repressing genes of different epithelial cell-cell junctions
Vandewalle, C. (2005) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki965 · Cited by 542
Metadata
- Authors
- Elloul, S., Bukholt Elstrand, M., Nesland, J. M., Tropé, C. G., Kvalheim, G., Goldberg, I., Reich, R., & Davidson, B.
- Venue
- Cancer
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1631-1643
- ISSN
- 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0142
- OpenAlex
- W1965255998
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 9.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Snail, Slug, and Smad‐interacting protein 1 as novel parameters of disease aggressiveness in metastatic ovarian and breast carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.20946
- The paper
- Elloul, S., Bukholt Elstrand, M., Nesland, J. M., Tropé, C. G., Kvalheim, G., Goldberg, I., Reich, R., & Davidson, B. (2005). Snail, Slug, and Smad‐interacting protein 1 as novel parameters of disease aggressiveness in metastatic ovarian and breast carcinoma. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20946
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.