Cited by 177Metabolism, Diabetes, and CancerBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesCancer Risks and Factors

Effect of Metformin on Survival Outcomes in Diabetic Patients With Triple Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer

Open access
Bayraktar, Soley, Hernadez‐Aya, Leonel F., Lei, Xiudong, Meric‐Bernstam, Funda, Litton, Jennifer K., Hsu, Limin, Hortobagyi, Gabriel N., Gonzalez‐Angulo, Ana M.·2012·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent observational studies have shown that metformin use in diabetic patients decreases both cancer incidence and mortality. Metformin use is also independently predictive of pathologic complete response. In the current study, the authors explored the association between metformin use and survival outcomes in patients with triple receptor-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who were receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: The Breast Cancer Management System database of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center identified 1448 women who received adjuvant chemotherapy for TNBC between 1995 and 2007. Patients were categorized by diabetes status and metformin use. The Kaplan-Meier product-limit method was used to calculate distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards models were fit to determine the association between metformin use and survival outcomes. RESULTS: The study cohort was comprised of 63 diabetic patients receiving treatment with metformin, 67 diabetic patients not receiving metformin, and 1318 nondiabetic patients. Patients in the diabetic groups tended to be older (P = .005); more diabetic patients were postmenopausal (P = .0007), black (P = .0001), and obese (P < .0001). At a median follow-up of 62 months, there were no significant differences with regard to 5-year DMFS (P = .23), RFS (P = .38), and OS (P = .58) between the 3 groups. Compared with the metformin group, patients who did not receive metformin (hazard ratio [HR], 1.63; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.87-3.06 [P = .13]) and nondiabetic patients (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 0.97-2.71 [P = .06]) tended to have a higher risk of distant metastases. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the current study suggest that metformin use during adjuvant chemotherapy does not significantly impact survival outcomes in diabetic patients with TNBC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.26439

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A retrospective analysis of patients with T2DM and TNBC by Bayraktar et al. indicated that treatment with adjuvant metformin was not associated with a significantly improved survival.

    “In contrast to the data from in vitro studies, a retrospective analysis of patients with T2DM and TNBC by Bayraktar et al. indicated that treatment with adjuvant metformin was not associated with a significantly improved survival and concluding the need for data from prospective Phase III randomized studies (252).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]Seventh Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and Handbook 2010

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bayraktar, S., Hernadez‐Aya, L. F., Lei, X., Meric‐Bernstam, F., Litton, J. K., Hsu, L., Hortobagyi, G. N., & Gonzalez‐Angulo, A. M.
Affiliations
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-07-28
Volume
118
Issue
5
Pages
1202-1211
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2078767636
Cited by
176
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 18
FWCI
7.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k23ca121994-03)
  • National Cancer Institute (P50CA116199, 1K23CA121994-01), K23-CA121994)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
metformin, diabetes mellitus, adjuvant chemotherapy, distant metastasis-free survival, recurrence-free survival, overall survival, survival outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Breast Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Metformin, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Survival Analysis, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome, Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review