Cited by 1,115Metabolism, Diabetes, and CancerCancer Cells and MetastasisCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism

Metformin Selectively Targets Cancer Stem Cells, and Acts Together with Chemotherapy to Block Tumor Growth and Prolong Remission

Open access
Hirsch, Heather A., Iliopoulos, Dimitrios, Tsichlis, Philip N., Struhl, Kevin·2009·Cancer Research

Abstract

The cancer stem cell hypothesis suggests that, unlike most cancer cells within a tumor, cancer stem cells resist chemotherapeutic drugs and can regenerate the various cell types in the tumor, thereby causing relapse of the disease. Thus, drugs that selectively target cancer stem cells offer great promise for cancer treatment, particularly in combination with chemotherapy. Here, we show that low doses of metformin, a standard drug for diabetes, inhibits cellular transformation and selectively kills cancer stem cells in four genetically different types of breast cancer. The combination of metformin and a well-defined chemotherapeutic agent, doxorubicin, kills both cancer stem cells and non–stem cancer cells in culture. Furthermore, this combinatorial therapy reduces tumor mass and prevents relapse much more effectively than either drug alone in a xenograft mouse model. Mice seem to remain tumor-free for at least 2 months after combinatorial therapy with metformin and doxorubicin is ended. These results provide further evidence supporting the cancer stem cell hypothesis, and they provide a rationale and experimental basis for using the combination of metformin and chemotherapeutic drugs to improve treatment of patients with breast (and possibly other) cancers. [Cancer Res 2009;69(19):7507–11]

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-09-2994

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The association of metformin and doxorubicin killed both cancer stem cells and non-stem cancer cells in culture.

    “The association of metformin and doxorubicin killed both cancer stem cells and non-stem cancer cells in culture.”
  • The association of metformin and doxorubicin may reduce tumor mass and prevent relapse more effectively than either drug used as monotherapy.

    “This may reduce tumor mass and prevent relapse more effectively than either drug used as monotherapy [157].”
  • Low doses of metformin inhibited cellular transformation and selectively killed cancer stem cells in four genetically different types of breast cancer in a mouse xenograft model.

    “Low doses of metformin inhibited cellular transformation and selectively killed cancer stem cells in four genetically different types of breast cancer in a mouse xenograft model.”
  • Metformin may selectively kill cancer stem cells and enhance effectiveness of breast cancer treatment regimens.

    “Other in vitro studies suggest that metformin may selectively kill cancer stem cells and enhance effectiveness of breast cancer treatment regimens (85–87).”

    From Diabetes and Cancer (2010) · cites this paper as [86]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hirsch, H. A., Iliopoulos, D., Tsichlis, P. N., & Struhl, K.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Tufts Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Struhl, Kevin
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2009-10-01
Volume
69
Issue
19
Pages
7507-7511
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2125747634
Cited by
1,115
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 89 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 101 · 2014: 107 · 2013: 91 · 2012: 86
FWCI
31.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • American Cancer Society
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (CA 57436, R01CA107486, CA107486, R01CA057436)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Keywords
metformin, cancer stem cells, breast cancer, doxorubicin, combination chemotherapy, cancer stem cell hypothesis, tumor recurrence, tumor xenografts, drug repurposing, cell transformation
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Breast, Breast Neoplasms, Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Doxorubicin, Female, Humans, Metformin, Mice, Nude, Random Allocation, Neoplastic Stem Cells, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Growth Processes, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review