Cited by 503Metabolism, Diabetes, and CancerDiabetes Treatment and ManagementPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research

Metformin Associated With Lower Cancer Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes

Open access
Landman, Gijs W.D., Kleefstra, Nanne, van Hateren, Kornelis J.J., Groenier, Klaas H., Gans, Rijk O.B., Bilo, Henk J.G.·2010·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Several studies have suggested an association between specific diabetes treatment and cancer mortality. We studied the association between metformin use and cancer mortality in a prospectively followed cohort. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In 1998 and 1999, 1,353 patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled in the Zwolle Outpatient Diabetes project Integrating Available Care (ZODIAC) study in the Netherlands. Vital status was assessed in January 2009. Cancer mortality rate was evaluated using standardized mortality ratios (SMRs), and the association between metformin use and cancer mortality was evaluated with a Cox proportional hazards model, taking possible confounders into account. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 9.6 years, average age at baseline was 68 years, and average A1C was 7.5%. Of the patients, 570 died, of which 122 died of malignancies. The SMR for cancer mortality was 1.47 (95% CI 1.22–1.76). In patients taking metformin compared with patients not taking metformin at baseline, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for cancer mortality was 0.43 (95% CI 0.23–0.80), and the HR with every increase of 1 g of metformin was 0.58 (95% CI 0.36–0.93). CONCLUSIONS: In general, patients with type 2 diabetes are at increased risk for cancer mortality. In our group, metformin use was associated with lower cancer mortality compared with nonuse of metformin. Although the design cannot provide a conclusion about causality, our results suggest a protective effect of metformin on cancer mortality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc09-1380

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The reduced risk of cancer and cancer mortality observed in studies of metformin users has been consistently in the range of 25% to 30%.

    “The reduced risk of cancer and cancer mortality observed in these studies has been consistently in the range of 25% to 30% [135-139,145-147].”
  • A prospective study found that metformin use at baseline was associated with lower cancer-related mortality, and the association appeared dose dependent.

    “A prospective study (median follow-up time of 9.6 years) found that metformin use at baseline was associated with lower cancer-related mortality and that this association appeared to be dose dependent [138].”
  • Metformin use is associated with lower cancer-related mortality.

    “Metformin use is associated with lower cancer-related mortality.”
  • Patients with type 2 diabetes who are prescribed metformin had a lower risk of cancer compared to patients who did not take it.

    “Patients with type 2 diabetes who are prescribed metformin had a lower risk of cancer compared to patients who did not take it.”
  • When compared to those on other treatments, metformin users had a lower risk of cancer, and a dose-relationship has been reported.

    “When compared to those on other treatments, metformin users had a lower risk of cancer. A dose-relationship has been reported [138,144,145].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Landman, G. W. D., Kleefstra, N., van Hateren, K. J. J., Groenier, K. H., Gans, R. O. B., & Bilo, H. J. G.
Affiliations
  • Isala (NL)
  • Diabetes Centre, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands;
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Landman, Gijs W.D.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2009-11-16
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
322-326
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2058725063
Cited by
502
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 48
FWCI
18.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Keywords
metformin, cancer mortality, type 2 diabetes, diabetes drugs, cancer risk, standardized mortality ratio
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Pressure, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Angiopathies, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypertension, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Metformin, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Netherlands, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Smoking, Cohort Studies, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review