Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intact sorting, targeting, and clustering of γ‐aminobutyric acid A receptor subtypes in hippocampal neurons in vitro

Brünig, Ina, Scotti, Eleonora, Sidler, Corinne, Fritschy, Jean‐Marc·2002·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

The cellular and subcellular distribution of four GABA A receptor subtypes, identified by the presence of the α1, α2, α3, or α5 subunit, was investigated immunocytochemically in dissociated cultures of hippocampal neurons. We addressed the questions whether (1) cell‐type specific expression, (2) axonal/somatodendritic targeting, and (3) synaptic/extrasynaptic clustering of GABA A receptor subtypes was retained in vitro. For comparison, the in vivo distribution pattern was assessed in sections from adult rat brain. The differential expression of GABA A receptor subunits allowed to identify five morphologically distinct cell types in culture: the α1 subunit was observed in glutamic acid decarboxylase–positive interneurons, the α2 and α5 subunits marked pyramidal‐like cells, and the α3 subunit labeled three additional cell types, including presumptive hilar cells. All subunits were found in the somatodendritic compartment. In addition, appropriate axonal targeting was evidenced by the intense α2, and sometimes α3 subunit labeling of axon‐initial segments (AIS) of pyramidal cells and hilar cells, respectively. Accordingly, both receptor subtypes were targeted to AIS in vivo, as well. Synaptic receptors were identified by colocalization with gephyrin, a postsynaptic clustering protein, and apposition to presynaptic terminals labeled with synapsin I. In vitro and in vivo, α1‐ and α2‐receptor subtypes formed numerous synaptic clusters, α3‐GABA A receptors were located either synaptically or extrasynaptically depending on the cell type, whereas α5‐GABA A receptors were extrasynaptic. We conclude that receptor targeting to broad subcellular locations does not require specific GABAergic innervation patterns, which are disturbed in vitro, but depends on protein‐protein interactions in the postsynaptic cell that are both subunit‐ and neuron‐specific. J. Comp. Neurol. 443:43–55, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.10102

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
Brünig, I., Scotti, E., Sidler, C., & Fritschy, J.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-12-28
Volume
443
Issue
1
Pages
43-55
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2056042967
Cited by
279
References
5
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intact sorting, targeting, and clustering of γ‐aminobutyric acid A receptor subtypes in hippocampal neurons in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.10102
The paper
Brünig, I., Scotti, E., Sidler, C., & Fritschy, J. (2002). Intact sorting, targeting, and clustering of γ‐aminobutyric acid A receptor subtypes in hippocampal neurons in vitro. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.10102

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.