Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 703

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Organization of cerebral cortical afferent systems in the rat. II. Magnocellular basal nucleus

Saper, Clifford B.·1984·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

The organization of the magnocellular basal nucleus (MBN) projection to cerebral cortex in the rat has been studied by using cytoarchitectonic, immunohistochemical, and retrograde and anterograde transport methods. The distribution of retrogradely labeled basal forebrain neurons after cortical injections of wheat germ agglutinin‐horseradish peroxidase conjugate was essentially identical to that of neurons staining immunohistochemically for choline acetyltransferase. These large (20–30 μm perikaryon diameter) multipolar neurons were found scattered through a number of basal forebrain cell groups: medial septal nucleus, nucleus of the diagonal band of Broca, magnocellular preoptic nucleus, substantia innominata, and globus pallidus. This peculiar distribution mimics the locations of pathways by which descending cortical fibers enter the diencephalon. Each cortical area was innervated by a characteristic subset of MBN neurons, always located in close association with descending cortical fibers. In many instances anterogradely labeled descending cortical fibers appeared to ramify into diffuse terminal fields among MBN neurons which were retrogradely labeled by the same cortical injection. Double label experiments using retrograde transport of fluorescent dyes confirmed that MBN neurons innervate restricted cortical fields. Anterograde autoradiographic transport studies after injections of 3 H‐amino acids into MBN revealed that MBN axons reach cerebral cortex primarily via two pathways: (1) The medial pathway, arising from the medial septal nucleus, nucleus of the diagonal band, and medial substantia innominata and globus pallidus MBN neurons, curves dorsally rostral to the diagonal band nucleus, up to the genu of the corpus callosum. Most of the fibers either directly enter medial frontal cortex or turn back over the genu of the corpus callosum into the superficial medial cingulate bundle. Many of these fibers enter anterior cigulate or retrosplenial cortex, but some can be traced back to the splenium of the corpus callosum, where a few enter visual cortex but most turn ventrally and sweep into the hippocampal formation. Here they are joined by other fibers which, at the genu of the corpus callosum, remain ventrally located and run caudally through the dorsal fornix into the hippocampus. (2) The lateral pathway arises in part from medial septal, diagonal band, and magnocellular preoptic neurons whose axons sweep laterally through the substantia innominata to innervate primarily piriform, perirhinal, and entorhinal cortex. Some of these fibers may also enter the hippocampal formation from the entorhinal cortex via the ventral subiculum. By far the largest part of the lateral pathway arises in the substantia innominata and globus pallidus. These axons sweep laterally through the substantia innominata and ventral part of the putamen to enter the external capsule, from which they distribute to the cortex of the lateral wall of the hemisphere. A few fibers also directly enter the piriform and entorhinal cortex. MBN axons in neocortex are found in highest concentration in layer V, and in the deepest part of layer VI, and in more moderate density in layers I and III, with only minor regional variation. In the subicular, entorhinal, and piriform cortex, the superficial molecular and deep cellular layers are most densely innervated. In the hippocampus, densest innervation was seen just adjacent to the alveus and in the superficial stratum lacunosum‐moleculare; the supra‐ and infragranular layers were most densely innervated in the dentate gyrus. Throughout the hippocampus, MBN axons seemed to avoid the more densely cellular layers: stratum pyramidale in the CA fields and granular layer in the dentate gyrus (though the dentate hilus was moderately densely innervated). These results emphasize that a highly topographically ordered relationship with MBN is a basic feature of the organization of every portion of the cerebral cortex. Not only does MBN provide a similarly distributed innervation to each area of cerebral cortex, but MBN neurons probably receive inputs from the same cortical areas which they innervate. Despite its spatial dispersion, the relationship of each portion of MBN with descending axons from its cortical terminal field appears to be relatively constant. MBN, on cytoarchitectural, biochemical, and connectional grounds, is a single nucleus, and its spatially dispersed distribution can be explained on the basis of its cortical relations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.902220302

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Metadata

Authors
Saper, C. B.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-01-20
Volume
222
Issue
3
Pages
313-342
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2072717295
Cited by
703
References
6
FWCI
14.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organization of cerebral cortical afferent systems in the rat. II. Magnocellular basal nucleus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.902220302
The paper
Saper, C. B. (1984). Organization of cerebral cortical afferent systems in the rat. II. Magnocellular basal nucleus. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902220302

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.